Aderans

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • StinkySmurf
    replied
    Originally posted by 534623
    Do you really want that every second user in this forum will attack me??

    I mean, the same happend during the "I-love-so-much-Replicel" phase. And the more I backed up my claims and my predictions for their trail results, the more they attacked me. I mean, should I suffer the same fate with the "I-love-so much-Aderans" phase?? For what? For "Being again the scientist of the year" or what?
    I could care less how many people attack me so lets hear it...

    Leave a comment:


  • yeahyeahyeah
    replied
    Originally posted by Desmond84
    You know I went back and re-read the posts that were written the last few days about Aderans to see how this whole thing about no DP in Aderans started. Here's some of them:






    I'm getting a feeling this whole thing was orchestrated by Dr. Nigam to make his procedure look more groundbreaking <sigh> seriously, they like toying with us man!
    Dr Nigam is a shady HT surgeon, why the **** are you guys taking his word so seriously?

    Anyway I always had a feeling Aderans was a waste of time.

    My money is on histogen, always has been.

    Leave a comment:


  • StinkySmurf
    replied
    Originally posted by UK Boy
    Can you say who told you that? How would they know what the results were like? Were they a trial patient? or involved in Aderans? or were they just someone who saw a presentation?
    Someone who saw the result on a lot of different people and who had no reason to lie, but not someone I know personally or anything.

    Leave a comment:


  • Desmond84
    replied
    You know I went back and re-read the posts that were written the last few days about Aderans to see how this whole thing about no DP in Aderans started. Here's some of them:

    Originally posted by drnigams
    As per what German team said (Dr Lauster), they have met Dr Washniek,and as per boldy has done good research work on aderans ,it is said that Aderans use autologous epithelial stem cells and dermal sheath stem cells ,not dermal papilla culture,i may be wrong,check it yourself.As you know i am in the process to add inducible dp culture into my hm process.And further to this we would add cultured dermal papilla itself into our hm process.As dermal papilla and not just dp cells are the commanders to de novo start hair follicle formation...!

    Originally posted by Boldy
    Not easy to roll out into the clinics (money) it does not fit in their profit plan.

    For example it costs them 4 K to culture the DP cells. that would mean they have to sell the procedure for 6-8 K. end result less people interested(less end profit).


    their second not so promising method is probably easier, does not require special trained professionals and is easily done for 500 usd (just an example). this way they can sell the procedure for 2-4 K per person. end result much interested people that can afford it. more profit, and repeated procedure per person until the head gets full of hair....

    Conclusion: its all about the money they don't give a **** about our hairs..

    what can we do about it?
    1. Accept the fact that DP culture could take yet again another 5-10 before it hits the market.
    2. Find our own solution that consists of DP culture and do it somewhere probably in Asia.
    I'm getting a feeling this whole thing was orchestrated by Dr. Nigam to make his procedure look more groundbreaking <sigh> seriously, they like toying with us man!

    Leave a comment:


  • StinkySmurf
    replied
    Originally posted by 534623
    Seriously, wtf is saying that they don't involve also dermal papilla cells (if you like them so much)??

    They simply use every useful mesenchymal cell type (dp included) AND epithelial cell types; and, of course, tested them (what works best etc).

    I mean, during every presentation they make or patent they file, they always mention the same - namely, what I just explained.

    DP cells, as always pretended by Nigam & dog, are definitely NOT "the commandment center" for hair follicle production. They are not even the "commandment center" for maintanance of hair follicles and circling. In the past, this has been just a theory.
    Ok, so this is my question for you then, regardless of how they're doing it. What do you think the results are? What kind of results do you think they're getting and do you think these results are bad or what exactly is it you don't like about these results?

    Leave a comment:


  • StinkySmurf
    replied
    Originally posted by Desmond84
    Aderans is very secretive unfortunately. You have to try and read between the lines and honestly I can't quite make out what's exactly in Ji Gami.
    Aderans has an existing business they need to protect for as long as possible. I would think the arrival of Ji Gami and HM will be good for the HT industry, but the pre-announcement will be the exact opposite so you just have to accept the fact that these guys have absolutely zero interest in helping us pin a date to this.

    And forget about $15,000. The number that matters is $500 to $1000 which is the COGS. The list price will change over time.

    Leave a comment:


  • UK Boy
    replied
    No worries man, we're all in the same situation so I know exactly how it messes with you. It's a new year and we're all waiting on news from Histogen, Aderans etc. January feels like it's gone on forever and we've still prob got months to wait.

    Leave a comment:


  • Desmond84
    replied
    Dude, I'm so sorry! (@UK_Boy)

    THis stupid presentation by Aderans is like watching an epidose of Lost!

    Before you watch it, you have 2 questions in your head. Once you finish watching, you end up with another 10 questions!!!

    Aderans is very secretive unfortunately. You have to try and read between the lines and honestly I can't quite make out what's exactly in Ji Gami.

    Unfortunately, everything I posted up until today was based on their 2010 presentation which went for over an hour! Since then they really have changed direction! They hardly mention DP cells anymore or follicular neogenesis!

    They don't do interviews or answer our emails...so I really don't know how to clarify these burning questions! All I could come up with was to just wait till June

    Brother, if there's any glimmer of hope, I'd be the first to jump on this forum and letting you all know about it.

    This whole news just really messed me up

    Leave a comment:


  • UK Boy
    replied
    [QUOTE=UK Boy;101862]!!!????? I've been on here too much today - too many ups and downs it's like a roller coaster! Desmond (Mr.Optimistic) you were on this major downer - I thought you had definite proof of what you were saying and it was all over, now just because of what Ironman has said you've done a full reversal, taken it back and gone back to "We'll have to wait and see what they say the..." WTF!?[/QUO

    Please don't take this as offensive btw, I'm just well confused. I think it's just a case of we're all still a bit unsure. Like you said, just have to wait an see.

    Leave a comment:


  • UK Boy
    replied
    Originally posted by Desmond84
    Iron_Man I really hope you're right about Aderans is still using DP!

    As long as DP cells are used and it actually aggregates around the hair follicle structure, immunity to DHT may be possible!

    We just have to wait till June and hear their official media release! God I'm so tired of waiting...
    !!!????? I've been on here too much today - too many ups and downs it's like a roller coaster! Desmond (Mr.Optimistic) you were on this major downer - I thought you had definite proof of what you were saying and it was all over, now just because of what Ironman has said you've done a full reversal, taken it back and gone back to "We'll have to wait and see what they say the..." WTF!?

    Leave a comment:


  • Desmond84
    replied
    Originally posted by UK Boy
    To be honest I don't think they would, people tend to like Desmond on this forum. He has always been a postitive contributor to the forum. You contribute A LOT of stuff Ironman but you do it in a horrible, patronising way and you just have an answer for everything, you may be a very intelligent guy but a little tact and modesty goes a long way rather than just saying "I'm right and you're all idiots, this is why...."

    I haven't been following this properly, I tend to just drift over your posts that go on and on, obviously Desmond has bothered to look into what you've said and has found it to be true. I also haven't seen where Dr's Lauster and Nigam back it up but again I'll trust Desmond on that one. Although when did Nigam become an authority on this stuff?! Last I heard everyone was saying he was a big fraud! And is Lauster posting on the forum now or something then? I thought we tend to never here anything from him anywhere.

    Anywayz I agree that if all Aderans can do is rejunvinate recently miniturised follicles for an unknown period of time then they are useless. Their tests have all been on the crown as well haven't they? so there's a good chance that they'll do nothing on the frontal area at all, so def not worth the cost of losing a patch of scalp (I was never keen on this anyway and always prefered Histogen for this reason) or the cost in money. I wouldn't pay £1,000 for it let alone £15,000 hopefully the general consencious will be the same and they'll lose out big in the long run. Just so annoying that so much time and money was wasted on this.
    Thx Brother

    I try to be positive! But there seems to be some truth behind what Iron_Man is saying! I don't know how I missed it! When you listen carefully, what they're using is a soup of dermal and epidermal cells without any indication as to what these cells might be!

    Washenik also specifically points out that there has been definitely no new hair follicles forming!

    With regards to Dr Lauster, that's something Dr. Nigam claimed he told him regarding Aderans! So who knows if he's making it up or not!

    I'm not a big fan of Nigam either btw

    Leave a comment:


  • UK Boy
    replied
    Originally posted by StinkySmurf
    I was told by a person who I believed the results were very good so I'd like to know what exactly are they doing if they aren't doing DP. Anyone have a guess?
    Can you say who told you that? How would they know what the results were like? Were they a trial patient? or involved in Aderans? or were they just someone who saw a presentation?

    Leave a comment:


  • Desmond84
    replied
    Iron_Man I really hope you're right about Aderans is still using DP!

    As long as DP cells are used and it actually aggregates around the hair follicle structure, immunity to DHT may be possible!

    We just have to wait till June and hear their official media release! God I'm so tired of waiting...

    Leave a comment:


  • UK Boy
    replied
    Originally posted by 534623
    No, we shouldn't discuss this - otherwise the kids in this forum will create threads like "F***Off Desmond84 ..." or something ...
    To be honest I don't think they would, people tend to like Desmond on this forum. He has always been a postitive contributor to the forum. You contribute A LOT of stuff Ironman but you do it in a horrible, patronising way and you just have an answer for everything, you may be a very intelligent guy but a little tact and modesty goes a long way rather than just saying "I'm right and you're all idiots, this is why...."

    I haven't been following this properly, I tend to just drift over your posts that go on and on, obviously Desmond has bothered to look into what you've said and has found it to be true. I also haven't seen where Dr's Lauster and Nigam back it up but again I'll trust Desmond on that one. Although when did Nigam become an authority on this stuff?! Last I heard everyone was saying he was a big fraud! And is Lauster posting on the forum now or something then? I thought we tend to never here anything from him anywhere.

    Anywayz I agree that if all Aderans can do is rejunvinate recently miniturised follicles for an unknown period of time then they are useless. Their tests have all been on the crown as well haven't they? so there's a good chance that they'll do nothing on the frontal area at all, so def not worth the cost of losing a patch of scalp (I was never keen on this anyway and always prefered Histogen for this reason) or the cost in money. I wouldn't pay £1,000 for it let alone £15,000 hopefully the general consencious will be the same and they'll lose out big in the long run. Just so annoying that so much time and money was wasted on this.

    Leave a comment:


  • john2399
    replied
    15 grand? who the f would spend that shitload of money on this crappy treatment? Aderans is done.

    Leave a comment:

Working...