Histogen Update - Spencer Kobren Speaks With Dr. Craig L. Ziering

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • clandestine
    replied
    tbtadmin; Spencer; Would it be at all possible to get an interview with Histogen regarding their latest release?

    Leave a comment:


  • Tracy C
    replied
    Originally posted by Nilli57211
    I don't know about finasteride, but I honestly do not believe that minoxidil or anything that causes an initial shed is really helping your follicles. I believe that all minoxidil does is get your follicles on the same schedule so the hairs are all breaking the surface of your scalp at the same time, creating the appearance of more hair. But it doesn't turn vellus hairs terminal or do any "unminiaturizing." Apparently Histogen does. With Histogen's results and the fact that they have actually made miniaturized hair terminal again WITHOUT a shed, I'm inclined to believe the idea of the initial shed helping your follicles to be utter and complete BS.
    You are allowed to believe anything you want to believe. Even when it isn't true.

    Leave a comment:


  • Nilli57211
    replied
    Originally posted by doinmyheadin
    In regards to the picture with the blonde ladies temple hair. I think someone else mentioned this in a earlier post.
    How come all the current treatments (finasteride and minox) supposedly shed hair to make way for new thicker hair. Am I correct in saying HSC wont cause shedding but will strengthen your existing hair?
    I don't know about finasteride, but I honestly do not believe that minoxidil or anything that causes an initial shed is really helping your follicles. I believe that all minoxidil does is get your follicles on the same schedule so the hairs are all breaking the surface of your scalp at the same time, creating the appearance of more hair. But it doesn't turn vellus hairs terminal or do any "unminiaturizing." Apparently Histogen does. With Histogen's results and the fact that they have actually made miniaturized hair terminal again WITHOUT a shed, I'm inclined to believe the idea of the initial shed helping your follicles to be utter and complete BS.

    Leave a comment:


  • doinmyheadin
    replied
    In regards to the picture with the blonde ladies temple hair. I think someone else mentioned this in a earlier post.
    How come all the current treatments (finasteride and minox) supposedly shed hair to make way for new thicker hair. Am I correct in saying HSC wont cause shedding but will strengthen your existing hair?

    Leave a comment:


  • Tracy C
    replied
    Originally posted by ccmethinning
    Any why is that?
    Because it does not prevent further hair loss.

    Leave a comment:


  • ccmethinning
    replied
    Originally posted by Kiwi
    Perhaps because you loose all your hair first. A cure would stop balding.
    Or you could just get incremental HST procedures as your hairline recedes, in effect never having to have significant baldness.

    Leave a comment:


  • Kiwi
    replied
    Why **** are you talking about Gho's FUE procedure on the Histogen thread.

    Histogen are way more reputable the Gho. Not only that but Gho is unaffordable for most of us even if there was proof.

    Histogen is where it's at in terms of cutting edge future treatments (I.e this topic). I just pray they hurry the hell up :P

    Leave a comment:


  • Kiwi
    replied
    Originally posted by ccmethinning
    Any why is that?
    Perhaps because you loose all your hair first. A cure would stop balding.

    Leave a comment:


  • ccmethinning
    replied
    Originally posted by Maradona
    Assuming Gho does as advertised , of course it's not a cure.
    Any why is that?

    Leave a comment:


  • Maradona
    replied
    Originally posted by UK Boy
    Hello everyone

    3. Why are the same people as mentioned above so happy to believe that Gho works from photos of the same standard as Histogen but class Histogen's photos as dodgy? I want to believe both can work but I'd much rather have a successful treatment with Histogen than Gho. As others have said, Gho is NOT a cure, in my mind he is just a refined version of FUE, I have no problem with that but I hope for something better.
    Gho doesn't seem to be only working from photos, research papers suggest the same thing and not only published by him but by other scientists.

    The photos that were taken from Gho were done by the patients himself, not modified in any way whatsoever by Gho and were done under the same conditions so they know there isn't any modifications in them that may mislead people from the results. Photos were so clear that it was even possible to count hairs one by one, you can't say the same about histogen recent photos.

    Assuming Gho does as advertised , of course it's not a cure.

    Neither is Histogen or Replicel. No treatment will eradicate baldness from every patient even if they are in the same Norwood scale. Just read the conclusions from histogen last results and Davis Hall or past scientists opinion on HM, they all point out it won't work for everyone.
    Follica, the leading research company looking for a cure, was very clear long time ago that a treatment like histogen will NOT work. But apparently they were WRONG because their results are very impressive even if it's just one patient.

    As for Gho, i don't know what the hell is wrong with him. He should prove to everyone his treatment with a 3rd party clinical team and count hairs one by one instead of letting amateurs do it online if he wants to convince all the skeptics.

    Either Gho doesn't give a **** or he is a lying about his claims and not doing what he says in his research papers.
    I think it's the latter.

    Let's keep this thread on topic from now on.

    Leave a comment:


  • tizzle
    replied
    Originally posted by BoSox
    Can you summarize the news again? For some reason I thought what was presented was old news and that they had something else.
    Here is the link:



    Its a better summary than i could ever give you

    Leave a comment:


  • Tracy C
    replied
    Originally posted by 534623
    is this the reason for still being here?
    Yes. I have received so much help from the American Hair Loss Association that I feel the need to give back if I can.

    Also even though I now have complete coverage, I do not have the density I want. So I pay very close attention to what is going on with these biotech companies that are trying to solve the problem.

    Leave a comment:


  • BoSox
    replied
    Originally posted by tizzle
    1. As i understand it, the news Dr. Naughton presented were the exciting news (And they sure as hell were exciting )
    Can you summarize the news again? For some reason I thought what was presented was old news and that they had something else.

    Leave a comment:


  • UK Boy
    replied
    Thanks

    Thanks for your reply Tizzle.

    Answers were pretty much as I expected.

    You're right the results presented by Dr. Naughton were indeed exciting so I can see why that was the 'exciting news'.

    It was my view also that Histogen can't risk lying so that's why I really can't understand the views of these people.

    Are we sure there's not a group of people getting some kinda comission from Gho, LOL! I'm only joking! I know I'll get ripped into unless I make that clear!

    Leave a comment:


  • tizzle
    replied
    1. As i understand it, the news Dr. Naughton presented were the exciting news (And they sure as hell were exciting )

    2. Histogen cannot afford to lie. If you mess with clinical trials i guess you will get FDA-blacklisted, probably there will be some criminal consequences and the company would lose its credibility

    3. Dont know

    Leave a comment:

Working...