Dr Nigam, my own experience

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Arashi
    replied
    Originally posted by tom vercetti
    if you continue in this way YES.. and everyone will be afraid to go in india for nothing. We all can say you thank you..
    Sorry but at this point, there's just no reasonable amount of doubt in my mind anymore that Nigams is a fraud. He's posting manufactured result photo's AGAIN. After this:

    1) When Dr Nigams came to this board, he posted photoshopped patient results on his site. He later said it was his webdesigner who went rogue and did this on his own. http://postimg.org/image/ju8l872sn/ and this one: http://postimg.org/image/eo3qhea5x/
    2) When Dr Nigams got confronted by the large amount of complaints regarding his weight clinic he lied about his clinic being his wife (or he lied on Indian television when he claimed it was his)
    3) Dr Nigams once posted a patient photo showing 3 months time between pre and postop, where patient hairlength was about 6 cm difference (hair grows 1 cm/month)
    4) Dr Nigams once posted a series of patient photo's with post-op dates in the future
    5) Dr Nigams once posted patient photo's from another doctor
    6) It turned out he's probably not a real doctor
    7) Patients who can 'proof' his theories disappear into nowhere
    8) There's a growing amount of complaints on Indian websites, stating his therapies don't work. According to Nigams this are his competitors
    9) A forum member called some well known doctors in India. They all said they thought Nigams was a fr**d.
    10) Nigams once claimed he was working with Dr Lauster. When forum members contacted Lausters' lab, they claimed they didn't work together at all

    And now your case turns out to be unusable and his IT team keeps on posting manufactured result photo's. Really ... I don't have doubts anymore, sorry.

    Leave a comment:


  • tom vercetti
    replied
    Originally posted by Arashi
    Yeah actually I DO blame NIgams for that !! He hired those people. If they're incompetent and make a fabricated, ridiculous analysis like this, it's Nigams responsibility ! It's his name on the picture.


    Cole was supposed to visit him. Never happened. I have a feeling we'll never hear from Mwamba either.
    if you continue in this way YES.. and everyone will be afraid to go in india for nothing. We all can say you thank you.. we will never get the test made by him maybe because of people like you. Do you understand that ?

    Leave a comment:


  • Arashi
    replied
    Sorry Tom but I'm just extremely pissed at Nigams. He messed up your case, I'm convinced this wasn't an accident. Then he has an IT team that fabricates doctored result photo's. And you keep defending him ? It only pisses me off more, sorry.

    Leave a comment:


  • Arashi
    replied
    Originally posted by tom vercetti
    Actually I seen the computer where they worked, when you are thousand circle I can just understand its difficult to found from a picture to another.. They are also Young peoples.. You want to blam dr nigam for that ?
    Yeah actually I DO blame NIgams for that !! He hired those people. If they're incompetent and make a fabricated, ridiculous analysis like this, it's Nigams responsibility ! It's his name on the picture.

    And also, dont forget mwamba will have tons of choice to see himself the result...
    Cole was supposed to visit him. Never happened. I have a feeling we'll never hear from Mwamba either.

    Leave a comment:


  • tom vercetti
    replied
    Originally posted by Arashi
    So, tell me, how did he explain it ? He didn't care about the analysis at all ? His IT is totally incompetent, they just 'do' stuff without knowing what they do ? Tom, sorry, but this photo is extremely embarrassing.

    And tell me, how are we supposed to do an analysis of your case if his IT can't even pinpoint 50 grafts ? Did you look at your photo's ? They're one big fat mess. Sorry, but it's going to be really impossible to say something useful regarding your case.
    Actually I seen the computer where they worked, when you are thousand circle I can just understand its difficult to found from a picture to another.. They are also Young peoples.. You want to blam dr nigam for that ? The case study of 25 patch test was not enough ? I met peoples with result, they was happy..

    Anyway, saying that I know you are honest in your approach, so please, stop this BS and I promise you to personnally take care they focus next time on my little scar in my donor ok ? And also, dont forget mwamba will have tons of choice to see himself the result... You will not think about dr nigam for doubling soon, you will be able to perform a full HT in europe... And with the new doubling protocol that allow him to bring 3/4 hair per graft.. just be patient because you flood (I hope you understand that as well as I understand you) and thats just make BS for nothing acctually. We are waiting for result arent we ?

    Leave a comment:


  • mari0s
    replied
    Originally posted by Arashi
    Now look at the numbering. Take a good look. You'll first notice something weird ... First you'll notice the line, it's not in the same place. Then you'll notice the numbers, they don't correlate at all. And then you'll notice ... the 2 circles are just showing totally different pieces of scalp !! Nigams just took 2 photo's of different pieces of scalp, put some numbers in it to make it look roughly the same.... Really this guy is a fraud. He just doesn't care about publishing scientific proof. He just makes stuff up.
    It could be still possible to compare them, the first circle is above a neo, while the second is far on a right side, (i think or could be a crust). So if someone would compare need to find that neo as mark

    Leave a comment:


  • Arashi
    replied
    Originally posted by tom vercetti
    He already explained it on hairsite 1,5 months ago.. why now are you doing that ?

    And.. he didnt do anything.. actually I was there when "he" made this, and it was not him.. but his IT team. He just ask them to circle and get good quality.. I do understand without tatoo its difficult, but we was all ok to say no tatoo on me.. So just stop BS arashi.. thanks

    Just relax.. and wait for some times ok ?
    So, tell me, how did he explain it ? He didn't care about the analysis at all ? His IT is totally incompetent, they just 'do' stuff without knowing what they do ? Tom, sorry, but this photo is extremely embarrassing.

    And tell me, how are we supposed to do an analysis of your case if his IT can't even pinpoint 50 grafts ? Did you look at your photo's ? They're one big fat mess. Sorry, but it's going to be really impossible to say something useful regarding your case.

    Leave a comment:


  • tom vercetti
    replied
    Originally posted by Arashi
    1) Nigams shaved a great deal of donor AFTER the pre-op picture, so we don't have the pre-op situation for quite a bit of donor. This point alone invalidates the whole test
    2) Nigams shaved 4 strips, rest of the donor hair was not shaved. He didn't tattoo anything, so how on earth are we going to locate exactly those 4 strips ?
    3) He implanted grafts back into donor and in the photo's it's impossible to distinguish extractions from implants.
    4) He implanted quite a lot of grafts into the hairline, without shaving, so how on earth are we going to locate every graft ?

    Really, look at the photo's, it's one big mess. It's impossible to do an analysis like this. And Nigams tried to cheat. AGAIN. Look at the 2 circles on this picture:https://www.dropbox.com/s/n5vzcjhyve...or-4---tom.jpg

    Now look at the numbering. Take a good look. You'll first notice something weird ... First you'll notice the line, it's not in the same place. Then you'll notice the numbers, they don't correlate at all. And then you'll notice ... the 2 circles are just showing totally different pieces of scalp !! Nigams just took 2 photo's of different pieces of scalp, put some numbers in it to make it look roughly the same.... Really this guy is a fraud. He just doesn't care about publishing scientific proof. He just makes stuff up.
    He already explained it on hairsite 1,5 months ago.. why now are you doing that ?

    And.. he didnt do anything.. actually I was there when "he" made this, and it was not him.. but his IT team. He just ask them to circle and get good quality.. I do understand without tatoo its difficult, but we was all ok to say no tatoo on me.. So just stop BS arashi.. thanks

    Just relax.. and wait for some times ok ?

    Leave a comment:


  • clandestine
    replied
    Truth, thanks.

    Leave a comment:


  • Arashi
    replied
    Originally posted by clandestine
    Why has Tom's case turned out to be useless?
    1) Nigams shaved a great deal of donor AFTER the pre-op picture, so we don't have the pre-op situation for quite a bit of donor. This point alone invalidates the whole test
    2) Nigams shaved 4 strips, rest of the donor hair was not shaved. He didn't tattoo anything, so how on earth are we going to locate exactly those 4 strips ?
    3) He implanted grafts back into donor and in the photo's it's impossible to distinguish extractions from implants.
    4) He implanted quite a lot of grafts into the hairline, without shaving, so how on earth are we going to locate every graft ?

    Really, look at the photo's, it's one big mess. It's impossible to do an analysis like this. And Nigams tried to cheat. AGAIN. Look at the 2 circles on this picture:https://www.dropbox.com/s/n5vzcjhyve...or-4---tom.jpg

    Now look at the numbering. Take a good look. You'll first notice something weird ... First you'll notice the line, it's not in the same place. Then you'll notice the numbers, they don't correlate at all. And then you'll notice ... the 2 circles are just showing totally different pieces of scalp !! Nigams just took 2 photo's of different pieces of scalp, put some numbers in it to make it look roughly the same.... Really this guy is a fraud. He just doesn't care about publishing scientific proof. He just makes stuff up.

    Leave a comment:


  • clandestine
    replied
    Originally posted by Arashi
    Just thinking out loud. I mean now Tom's case turns out to be useless ... Is there any hope left ?
    Why has Tom's case turned out to be useless?

    Leave a comment:


  • Arashi
    replied
    Originally posted by Boldy
    I think Lilpauly means my results ..
    I thought we already agreed a couple pages back, that my role there and experiments, where not for the public yet, since its experimental ? And that it should stay mechanical approach for you guys?
    Just thinking out loud. I mean now Tom's case turns out to be useless ... Is there any hope left ?

    Leave a comment:


  • Boldy
    replied
    Originally posted by TO YOUNG TO RETIRE
    Boldy i please bro.....
    I'm currently on my phone. I might consider it tonight.

    Leave a comment:


  • TO YOUNG TO RETIRE
    replied
    Boldy i please bro.....

    Leave a comment:


  • Boldy
    replied
    Originally posted by clandestine
    Boldy am I understanding that you've posted pictures somewhere?

    My plan was to share also here with you guys, but with such certain people with a certain paranoid behavior, I think you might understand, why I keep it just there for now.

    Leave a comment:

Working...