Sorry but at this point, there's just no reasonable amount of doubt in my mind anymore that Nigams is a fraud. He's posting manufactured result photo's AGAIN. After this:
1) When Dr Nigams came to this board, he posted photoshopped patient results on his site. He later said it was his webdesigner who went rogue and did this on his own. http://postimg.org/image/ju8l872sn/ and this one: http://postimg.org/image/eo3qhea5x/
2) When Dr Nigams got confronted by the large amount of complaints regarding his weight clinic he lied about his clinic being his wife (or he lied on Indian television when he claimed it was his)
3) Dr Nigams once posted a patient photo showing 3 months time between pre and postop, where patient hairlength was about 6 cm difference (hair grows 1 cm/month)
4) Dr Nigams once posted a series of patient photo's with post-op dates in the future
5) Dr Nigams once posted patient photo's from another doctor
6) It turned out he's probably not a real doctor
7) Patients who can 'proof' his theories disappear into nowhere
8) There's a growing amount of complaints on Indian websites, stating his therapies don't work. According to Nigams this are his competitors
9) A forum member called some well known doctors in India. They all said they thought Nigams was a fr**d.
10) Nigams once claimed he was working with Dr Lauster. When forum members contacted Lausters' lab, they claimed they didn't work together at all
And now your case turns out to be unusable and his IT team keeps on posting manufactured result photo's. Really ... I don't have doubts anymore, sorry.
Dr Nigam, my own experience
Collapse
X
-
Yeah actually I DO blame NIgams for that !! He hired those people. If they're incompetent and make a fabricated, ridiculous analysis like this, it's Nigams responsibility ! It's his name on the picture.
Cole was supposed to visit him. Never happened. I have a feeling we'll never hear from Mwamba either.Leave a comment:
-
Sorry Tom but I'm just extremely pissed at Nigams. He messed up your case, I'm convinced this wasn't an accident. Then he has an IT team that fabricates doctored result photo's. And you keep defending him ? It only pisses me off more, sorry.Leave a comment:
-
And also, dont forget mwamba will have tons of choice to see himself the result...Leave a comment:
-
So, tell me, how did he explain it ? He didn't care about the analysis at all ? His IT is totally incompetent, they just 'do' stuff without knowing what they do ? Tom, sorry, but this photo is extremely embarrassing.
And tell me, how are we supposed to do an analysis of your case if his IT can't even pinpoint 50 grafts ? Did you look at your photo's ? They're one big fat mess. Sorry, but it's going to be really impossible to say something useful regarding your case.
Anyway, saying that I know you are honest in your approach, so please, stop this BS and I promise you to personnally take care they focus next time on my little scar in my donor ok ? And also, dont forget mwamba will have tons of choice to see himself the result... You will not think about dr nigam for doubling soon, you will be able to perform a full HT in europe... And with the new doubling protocol that allow him to bring 3/4 hair per graft.. just be patient because you flood (I hope you understand that as well as I understand you) and thats just make BS for nothing acctually. We are waiting for result arent we ?Leave a comment:
-
Now look at the numbering. Take a good look. You'll first notice something weird ... First you'll notice the line, it's not in the same place. Then you'll notice the numbers, they don't correlate at all. And then you'll notice ... the 2 circles are just showing totally different pieces of scalp !! Nigams just took 2 photo's of different pieces of scalp, put some numbers in it to make it look roughly the same.... Really this guy is a fraud. He just doesn't care about publishing scientific proof. He just makes stuff up.Leave a comment:
-
He already explained it on hairsite 1,5 months ago.. why now are you doing that ?
And.. he didnt do anything.. actually I was there when "he" made this, and it was not him.. but his IT team. He just ask them to circle and get good quality.. I do understand without tatoo its difficult, but we was all ok to say no tatoo on me.. So just stop BS arashi.. thanks
Just relax.. and wait for some times ok ?
And tell me, how are we supposed to do an analysis of your case if his IT can't even pinpoint 50 grafts ? Did you look at your photo's ? They're one big fat mess. Sorry, but it's going to be really impossible to say something useful regarding your case.Leave a comment:
-
1) Nigams shaved a great deal of donor AFTER the pre-op picture, so we don't have the pre-op situation for quite a bit of donor. This point alone invalidates the whole test
2) Nigams shaved 4 strips, rest of the donor hair was not shaved. He didn't tattoo anything, so how on earth are we going to locate exactly those 4 strips ?
3) He implanted grafts back into donor and in the photo's it's impossible to distinguish extractions from implants.
4) He implanted quite a lot of grafts into the hairline, without shaving, so how on earth are we going to locate every graft ?
Really, look at the photo's, it's one big mess. It's impossible to do an analysis like this. And Nigams tried to cheat. AGAIN. Look at the 2 circles on this picture:https://www.dropbox.com/s/n5vzcjhyve...or-4---tom.jpg
Now look at the numbering. Take a good look. You'll first notice something weird ... First you'll notice the line, it's not in the same place. Then you'll notice the numbers, they don't correlate at all. And then you'll notice ... the 2 circles are just showing totally different pieces of scalp !! Nigams just took 2 photo's of different pieces of scalp, put some numbers in it to make it look roughly the same.... Really this guy is a fraud. He just doesn't care about publishing scientific proof. He just makes stuff up.
And.. he didnt do anything.. actually I was there when "he" made this, and it was not him.. but his IT team. He just ask them to circle and get good quality.. I do understand without tatoo its difficult, but we was all ok to say no tatoo on me.. So just stop BS arashi.. thanks
Just relax.. and wait for some times ok ?Leave a comment:
-
1) Nigams shaved a great deal of donor AFTER the pre-op picture, so we don't have the pre-op situation for quite a bit of donor. This point alone invalidates the whole test
2) Nigams shaved 4 strips, rest of the donor hair was not shaved. He didn't tattoo anything, so how on earth are we going to locate exactly those 4 strips ?
3) He implanted grafts back into donor and in the photo's it's impossible to distinguish extractions from implants.
4) He implanted quite a lot of grafts into the hairline, without shaving, so how on earth are we going to locate every graft ?
Really, look at the photo's, it's one big mess. It's impossible to do an analysis like this. And Nigams tried to cheat. AGAIN. Look at the 2 circles on this picture:https://www.dropbox.com/s/n5vzcjhyve...or-4---tom.jpg
Now look at the numbering. Take a good look. You'll first notice something weird ... First you'll notice the line, it's not in the same place. Then you'll notice the numbers, they don't correlate at all. And then you'll notice ... the 2 circles are just showing totally different pieces of scalp !! Nigams just took 2 photo's of different pieces of scalp, put some numbers in it to make it look roughly the same.... Really this guy is a fraud. He just doesn't care about publishing scientific proof. He just makes stuff up.Leave a comment:
-
-
Just thinking out loud. I mean now Tom's case turns out to be useless ... Is there any hope left ?Leave a comment:
-
-
Leave a comment: