Dr Nigam, my own experience
Collapse
X
-
People are not so angry at Dr Nigam, it's more that they are (IMO) anxious to see results, and as the visual evidence is so poor, and continues to be so, the collective frustration becomes very obvious on the surface.
Iron Man is a disruptive troll and should have been banned from here years ago, yes.
Boldy, if you're listening, I hope you're doing well at the moment, and please keep us posted.Leave a comment:
-
Not sure if that mailbox is slow, but could you maybe send them again to:
drnigams@mailcatch.comLeave a comment:
-
-
I seen some photos of a patient who had surgery recently and I was impressed with the results. I'm getting surgery in 6 months if my regimen doesn't restore my receding hairline .Leave a comment:
-
OK I've sent about 5 emails there. I've sent them as he sent them to me, it's a bit of a mess in terms of photos are duplicated and unorganised! You might be able to make head from tail of it all. Feel free to upload these into a drop box folder in that shared account, perhaps create a folder called Tom.
drnigams@mailcatch.comLeave a comment:
-
Really, after seeing this: https://www.dropbox.com/s/n5vzcjhyve...or-4---tom.jpg
it's all over for me. No more faith in Nigams at all, he's never going to change, he'll keep trying to cheat and manipulate as he did in those circles. What a joke. Tom's case is useless, Nigams manipulating again with his research ... This is really embarrassing.Leave a comment:
-
Why is it so fvcking difficult to isolate a 1cm x 1cm (or inches) area thats close to a birth mark, take whatever number of grafts, do the work, implant them into another area that can be TRACKED and take close up shots of BOTH areas before and after with ample SOFT lighting (no use of flash, just lots of natural light). This way, all you do is count the number of individual hairs BEFORE in the donor area and match them with whatever is there AFTER. The recipient area will obviously be tracked after and whatever number of individual hairs are THERE can easily be counted and compared to the donor hairs.
DONE.
But god DAMN it, why is this still a problem?!? Why is such a simple more complex than trying to get laid by a biblethumper?!Leave a comment:
-
Really, after seeing this: https://www.dropbox.com/s/n5vzcjhyve...or-4---tom.jpg
it's all over for me. No more faith in Nigams at all, he's never going to change, he'll keep trying to cheat and manipulate as he did in those circles. What a joke. Tom's case is useless, Nigams manipulating again with his research ... This is really embarrassing.Leave a comment:
-
-
I'm really starting to get pissed again. Not sure how Dr Nigams could mess this all up so big. And then those 2 circles with just random, different pieces of scalp in it !?!? WTF ??? Really ... Does he think we're all idiots ?
I gave this dude the benefit of the doubt for quite a while but man, this is just horrible ... What a joke !Leave a comment:
-
This is exactly why I was getting pissed off at the whole situation a few weeks after Tom's procedure. Plenty of people telling me to calm down until 3 months later etc, but without pre ops pics we don't have a statistical starting point and can't produce results and conclude anything at all.
I gave this dude the benefit of the doubt for quite a while but man, this is just horrible ... What a joke !Leave a comment:
-
Yes this is exactly what hairman2 was referring to. We could do with finding the blown up large versions of these two photos. Bit busy atm, but i'll dig them out in about 1 hour unless you can find them at hairsite in the meantime. I've got another email here from Nigam with a bunch of crappy photos, post your email address and i'll forward it to you. You can delete your post/edit post and remove your email again.Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: