Dr Nigam, my own experience

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • didi
    Senior Member
    • Nov 2011
    • 1360

    Didn't dr nigam say that there will be apology published in Mumbai papers in regards to false reporting/rape allegations by dr anjali?




    problem with india is you can get away with anything provided you got bit of cash

    well respected HT doctor from India dr bhatti thinks nigam is a sc*m

    Comment

    • cocacola
      Senior Member
      • Feb 2013
      • 222

      guys you realize that you flooded 127 pages of nothing here. Just be patient, time will show if nigas is bs or legit.

      Comment

      • didi
        Senior Member
        • Nov 2011
        • 1360

        cocoacola

        you cant stop forum members from posting opinions and scrutinising his work, that's what its all about.

        too many red flags and its good to be optimist but so far whats been presented by nigams is not good enough, photography is not getting better even though he bought new slr,marking different areas of scalp , etc etc..

        im surprised spencer is allowing this to go on

        Comment

        • greatjob!
          Senior Member
          • Aug 2011
          • 909

          Originally posted by cocacola
          guys you realize that you flooded 127 pages of nothing here.
          Welcome to the btt. I could create a thread about injecting semen into your scalp to cure baldness and it would garner over 100 pages.

          Comment

          • Boldy
            Senior Member
            • Jan 2013
            • 287

            Originally posted by lilpauly
            Hellouser knows the person I will ask to join the forum but I can't post the pics without his approval

            I think Lilpauly means my results ..

            despite the already results on hairline, People there do understand that it takes more than 2 months to get results. that if a dr draws some wrong dots, that its will change the results on papyer maybe by maybe 1-3% instead everything? The end result should still be obvious after some months.

            btw,


            Originally posted by Arashi
            So, now Tom's case turned out to be totally unusable, what's next ? Should we wait for Boldy to do his experiments ?


            I thought we already agreed a couple pages back, that my role there and experiments, where not for the public yet, since its experimental ? And that it should stay mechanical approach for you guys?

            Here it is:

            Dear friends, today we have done part procedure on Tom the independent forum member ,we extracted grafts for stem cells, DP culture and DP isolation and implanted them back ,we did preimplantation incisions, injected growth factors, Dermal papillae cells, progenitor stem cells. into the recipient and donor area. We took


            and:

            Dear friends, today we have done part procedure on Tom the independent forum member ,we extracted grafts for stem cells, DP culture and DP isolation and implanted them back ,we did preimplantation incisions, injected growth factors, Dermal papillae cells, progenitor stem cells. into the recipient and donor area. We took

            Comment

            • clandestine
              Senior Member
              • Aug 2011
              • 2002

              Boldy am I understanding that you've posted pictures somewhere?

              Comment

              • TO YOUNG TO RETIRE
                Senior Member
                • Mar 2013
                • 638

                Boldy here are also people that RESPECT you, please post here pictures.

                thanks

                Comment

                • Boldy
                  Senior Member
                  • Jan 2013
                  • 287

                  Originally posted by clandestine
                  Boldy am I understanding that you've posted pictures somewhere?

                  My plan was to share also here with you guys, but with such certain people with a certain paranoid behavior, I think you might understand, why I keep it just there for now.

                  Comment

                  • TO YOUNG TO RETIRE
                    Senior Member
                    • Mar 2013
                    • 638

                    Boldy i please bro.....

                    Comment

                    • Boldy
                      Senior Member
                      • Jan 2013
                      • 287

                      Originally posted by TO YOUNG TO RETIRE
                      Boldy i please bro.....
                      I'm currently on my phone. I might consider it tonight.

                      Comment

                      • Arashi
                        Senior Member
                        • Aug 2012
                        • 3888

                        Originally posted by Boldy
                        I think Lilpauly means my results ..
                        I thought we already agreed a couple pages back, that my role there and experiments, where not for the public yet, since its experimental ? And that it should stay mechanical approach for you guys?
                        Just thinking out loud. I mean now Tom's case turns out to be useless ... Is there any hope left ?

                        Comment

                        • clandestine
                          Senior Member
                          • Aug 2011
                          • 2002

                          Originally posted by Arashi
                          Just thinking out loud. I mean now Tom's case turns out to be useless ... Is there any hope left ?
                          Why has Tom's case turned out to be useless?

                          Comment

                          • Arashi
                            Senior Member
                            • Aug 2012
                            • 3888

                            Originally posted by clandestine
                            Why has Tom's case turned out to be useless?
                            1) Nigams shaved a great deal of donor AFTER the pre-op picture, so we don't have the pre-op situation for quite a bit of donor. This point alone invalidates the whole test
                            2) Nigams shaved 4 strips, rest of the donor hair was not shaved. He didn't tattoo anything, so how on earth are we going to locate exactly those 4 strips ?
                            3) He implanted grafts back into donor and in the photo's it's impossible to distinguish extractions from implants.
                            4) He implanted quite a lot of grafts into the hairline, without shaving, so how on earth are we going to locate every graft ?

                            Really, look at the photo's, it's one big mess. It's impossible to do an analysis like this. And Nigams tried to cheat. AGAIN. Look at the 2 circles on this picture:https://www.dropbox.com/s/n5vzcjhyve...or-4---tom.jpg

                            Now look at the numbering. Take a good look. You'll first notice something weird ... First you'll notice the line, it's not in the same place. Then you'll notice the numbers, they don't correlate at all. And then you'll notice ... the 2 circles are just showing totally different pieces of scalp !! Nigams just took 2 photo's of different pieces of scalp, put some numbers in it to make it look roughly the same.... Really this guy is a fraud. He just doesn't care about publishing scientific proof. He just makes stuff up.

                            Comment

                            • clandestine
                              Senior Member
                              • Aug 2011
                              • 2002

                              Truth, thanks.

                              Comment

                              • tom vercetti
                                Senior Member
                                • May 2013
                                • 129

                                Originally posted by Arashi
                                1) Nigams shaved a great deal of donor AFTER the pre-op picture, so we don't have the pre-op situation for quite a bit of donor. This point alone invalidates the whole test
                                2) Nigams shaved 4 strips, rest of the donor hair was not shaved. He didn't tattoo anything, so how on earth are we going to locate exactly those 4 strips ?
                                3) He implanted grafts back into donor and in the photo's it's impossible to distinguish extractions from implants.
                                4) He implanted quite a lot of grafts into the hairline, without shaving, so how on earth are we going to locate every graft ?

                                Really, look at the photo's, it's one big mess. It's impossible to do an analysis like this. And Nigams tried to cheat. AGAIN. Look at the 2 circles on this picture:https://www.dropbox.com/s/n5vzcjhyve...or-4---tom.jpg

                                Now look at the numbering. Take a good look. You'll first notice something weird ... First you'll notice the line, it's not in the same place. Then you'll notice the numbers, they don't correlate at all. And then you'll notice ... the 2 circles are just showing totally different pieces of scalp !! Nigams just took 2 photo's of different pieces of scalp, put some numbers in it to make it look roughly the same.... Really this guy is a fraud. He just doesn't care about publishing scientific proof. He just makes stuff up.
                                He already explained it on hairsite 1,5 months ago.. why now are you doing that ?

                                And.. he didnt do anything.. actually I was there when "he" made this, and it was not him.. but his IT team. He just ask them to circle and get good quality.. I do understand without tatoo its difficult, but we was all ok to say no tatoo on me.. So just stop BS arashi.. thanks

                                Just relax.. and wait for some times ok ?

                                Comment

                                Working...