Nigams doubling test FAILED + proof.

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Arashi
    replied
    Originally posted by JJJJrS
    Does anyone know when these photos were uploaded?

    And yes, they're obvious and poorly thought out photoshops.
    I have an image of everything on my hdd. You can download 'wget' for windows. http://gnuwin32.sourceforge.net/packages/wget.htm It's a command line tool. When you enter from a command prompt in windows:

    wget -r http://drnigams.net/images

    It just copies ALL the files to your HDD and you can see all file dates.

    Leave a comment:


  • JJJJrS
    replied
    Originally posted by One
    More images taken from arashi's link seem obviously photoshopped!
    Does anyone know when these photos were uploaded?

    And yes, they're obvious and poorly thought out photoshops.

    Leave a comment:


  • Arashi
    replied
    Originally posted by didi
    Even Dr Cole claimed 60% donor regeneration and never supplied any evidence to support the claim. I think Dr mwamba found idea interesting and jumped on bandwagon since everybody is multiplying these days. No one showed any evidence that they can multiply hairs, its baffling.

    I like Dr Rasmans comment on donor doubling

    http://www.baldingblog.com/2013/11/0...r-replication/
    "Anyone who graduated medical school with one year residency can attend a seminar and set up shop as a hair transplant doctor. " Well you don't even need that in India

    Leave a comment:


  • didi
    replied
    Even Dr Cole claimed 60% donor regeneration and never supplied any evidence to support the claim. I think Dr mwamba found idea interesting and jumped on bandwagon since everybody is multiplying these days. No one showed any evidence that they can multiply hairs, its baffling.

    I like Dr Rasmans comment on donor doubling

    Leave a comment:


  • Arashi
    replied
    Originally posted by One
    More images taken from arashi's link seem obviously
    I was thinking about that. What seems more likely: that mr Nigam fired his photoshopper after he got caught ... Or that he instructed his photoshopper to use different before-after photo's instead ? To me it seems the second option is much more likely. I was looking at file headers though, quite often it says photoshop, but that doesn't necessarily prove anything, cause he could just have adjusted the lighting a bit for example in photoshop. But again, it seems highly unlikely to me that he never used that photoshop guy again.

    *EDIT* LOL, some of those photo's are indeed extremely easy to see, haha.

    Leave a comment:


  • One
    replied
    More images taken from arashi's link seem obviously photoshopped!


    i











    Leave a comment:


  • hellouser
    replied
    Originally posted by Arashi
    Hehe .Remember how we were even thinking about funding mr Nigam to get a good photographer. How ironic that seems now.
    So how do you feel about crowdfunding now and having just ourselves do the procedures? lol

    Leave a comment:


  • Arashi
    replied
    Originally posted by JJJJrS
    That's why I never buy these excuses about clinics not knowing how to document properly.

    These people claim to be multiplying hair but when you ask them for a few nice pictures, it's apparently too complex for them, even with detailed instructions
    Yup. Every time it turns out ... if something goes against common sense, it most probably just isn't true.

    Leave a comment:


  • Arashi
    replied
    Originally posted by hellouser
    I kind of want that lens now, lol.
    Hehe .Remember how we were even thinking about funding mr Nigam to get a good photographer. How ironic that seems now.

    Leave a comment:


  • JJJJrS
    replied
    Originally posted by Arashi
    And there we were ... everybody was thinking, well maybe he is onto something but he just doesn't know how to document it. LOL.
    That's why I never buy these excuses about clinics not knowing how to document properly.

    These people claim to be multiplying hair but when you ask them for a few nice pictures, it's apparently too complex for them, even with detailed instructions

    Leave a comment:


  • hellouser
    replied
    Originally posted by Arashi
    Well, what's the use, mr Nigam shot those photo's and never showed them to us. So what's the use ...
    I kind of want that lens now, lol.

    Leave a comment:


  • Arashi
    replied
    Originally posted by gc83uk
    drnigams.net/Before%26after/2.png

    is that the same guy in the before and after?
    I think so. Same nose, same ears, same shape of skull (big cheekbones). Different hair length though, different lighting (in pretty much ALL before photo's Nigams uses heavy lighting) and he did FUE on him.

    Leave a comment:


  • Arashi
    replied
    And there we were ... everybody was thinking, well maybe he is onto something but he just doesn't know how to document it. LOL.

    Leave a comment:


  • gc83uk
    replied
    drnigams.net/Before%26after/2.png

    is that the same guy in the before and after?

    Leave a comment:


  • Arashi
    replied
    Originally posted by hellouser
    Thats too bad if he's not taking photos anymore. That lens and the result we just saw is exactly what we need (and of course general shots of the entire area as well). But god damn... thats the perfect lens for our purposes.
    Well, what's the use, mr Nigam shot those photo's and never showed them to us. So what's the use ...

    Leave a comment:

Working...