Nigams doubling test FAILED + proof.

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 534623
    replied
    Originally posted by Arashi

    All you have is that paper. A paper containing statements that never could be verified or reproduced by anybody else.
    Absolutely wrong. Aren't you the one who "verified" the failed extraction part in that paper in sensational way and who thought he "debunked HSCI"?? lol

    Or in simple words - Does it mean that you always thought that when you buy 1000 HST grafts that they will only make 1000 extractions? lol

    Hey Ironman !! You're back Sorry I missed your post earlier today man.
    That's just because 1) I can't post in realtime and 2) I guess you couldn't see it anymore within the flood of your own posts.

    Leave a comment:


  • Arashi
    replied
    Originally posted by 534623
    Sorry, but just because you're unable to read and to understand - it doesn't mean "HASCI failed".

    Oh, just in case you still don't understand:



    So what part of table 1, page 4 (including detailed explanations of table 1), you still don't understand?

    You come here and try to tell others in a sensational way the story that you "debunked HASCI" and that "they mostly need more drills to get the suitable grafts for implantation" - in fact, those grafts, a patient finally pays.

    Wow - great news! ...but your "sensational news" are as old as scientifically published by Dr. Gho himself in 2010 (up to 31% "failed extractions" etc - at least in this study).
    Hey Ironman !! You're back Sorry I missed your post earlier today man. Well we've had that HASCI discussion over and over. I've shown that HASCI's claims were not true for GC. There's NO proof of regeneration at all, anywhere. They've never shown us anything. They deliberately messed up the 2 50 graft tests. No celebrity ever went there more than 3 times. They don't have any showcase of a patient who had like 10k grafts. They tell people with good donor not to densify the temples. All you have is that paper. A paper containing statements that never could be verified or reproduced by anybody else. And I think you know that if something is not reproducable, it may per definition not be called science at all.

    If HASCI really had something, wouldn't you think it would be in their best interest to showcase it ? Nah you probably wouldn't think that. Regardless of all facts and evidence, you'll keep supporting HASCI for the rest of your life. Just as JarJarBinx will always support mr Nigam, regardless of the huge pile of evidence against him. Whatever, as long as you're happy with your results man.

    Leave a comment:


  • Arashi
    replied
    I really wonder what Mwamba thinks of the fact that mr Nigam's doubling failed. I just asked him that question in 'that' other place. Really interested to hear what he thinks !

    Leave a comment:


  • Arashi
    replied
    Anway from what I've seen most interesting stuff has been posted here. Proof of failure of his doubling test, proof he can (and did) shoot stellar photo's of pretty much the highest possible quality. Proof he changed persons in before-after photo's. Proof he applied photoshop in tons of pictures. And maybe the most interesting proof is in what the was not there: proof of ANY kind of success.

    Leave a comment:


  • Arashi
    replied
    This is a classic too: In just 4 months, Dr Nigams grew hair that must be at least 10 cm long: http://drnigams.net/images/Savio/B-A/Large/3.jpg

    Only in India !!

    Leave a comment:


  • Arashi
    replied
    And that was the end, guys. Dr Nigams just closed down the directory. It's not browseable anymore. The links still work though (the files are still there).

    Of course I have everything. It's 3.8 GB in total so not something to upload somewhere quickly, hehe.

    Leave a comment:


  • hellouser
    replied
    Originally posted by Arashi
    This one is quite hilarious too. Compare the shape of his skull (forehead) :



    Even Dr Nigams was then smart enough to see that, look how he presented the photo later:



    Hehe. What a clown.
    First photo looks like he had better results. WTF.

    Leave a comment:


  • didi
    replied
    Dr cole came out on one of his videos(think response to you jjjjrs) where he said he witenessed hair regeneration, that was long time ago and so far nothing to support the claim.
    Most of these numbers come out of their asses

    Leave a comment:


  • Arashi
    replied
    This one is quite hilarious too. Compare the shape of his skull (forehead) :



    Even Dr Nigams was then smart enough to see that, look how he presented the photo later:



    Hehe. What a clown.

    Leave a comment:


  • JJJJrS
    replied
    Originally posted by Arashi
    Any claim of hair multiplication without evidence pretty much by definition is a scam. A doctor only knows if it works if he has proof. And if he has that, the first thing he'd do is show it.
    Exactly. Always cracks me up when I hear doctors talk about 80%, 60%, 30% donor regeneration. When you ask them where these numbers came from, you never get a straight answer. Obviously, if you didn't pull those numbers out of your ass, you'd have some type of analysis that would be worth sharing with the community. Not a single ****ing surgeon has even documented any donor regeneration conclusively and apparently these docs are all just sitting on it.

    Leave a comment:


  • Arashi
    replied
    Originally posted by JJJJrS
    If you're truly multiplying hair, the first thing you do is prove it conclusively. The money will roll in after that and they know that.
    And this EVERYBODY should print out and stick onto their monitors So damn true. Any claim of hair multiplication without evidence pretty much by definition is a scam. A doctor only knows if it works if he has proof. And if he has that, the first thing he'd do is show it.

    Leave a comment:


  • hellouser
    replied
    Originally posted by didi
    Good you coppied them on HDD. Now just forward them to dr mwamba, he cant be turning blind eye to it, he needs to see what his business partner is doing.
    I'm downloading all the files as well. Gonna take a look myself....

    Leave a comment:


  • hellouser
    replied
    Originally posted by Arashi
    I have an image of everything on my hdd. You can download 'wget' for windows. http://gnuwin32.sourceforge.net/packages/wget.htm It's a command line tool. When you enter from a command prompt in windows:

    wget -r http://drnigams.net/images

    It just copies ALL the files to your HDD and you can see all file dates.
    There's a simple plugin for Firefox called 'downloadthemall' which downloads all image links on a webpage to a folder on your hard drive. Much easier to use, has some options as well and no need for a separate application for that.

    Leave a comment:


  • didi
    replied
    Originally posted by Arashi
    I have an image of everything on my hdd. You can download 'wget' for windows. http://gnuwin32.sourceforge.net/packages/wget.htm It's a command line tool. When you enter from a command prompt in windows:

    wget -r http://drnigams.net/images

    It just copies ALL the files to your HDD and you can see all file dates.


    Good you coppied them on HDD. Now just forward them to dr mwamba, he cant be turning blind eye to it, he needs to see what his business partner is doing.

    Leave a comment:


  • JJJJrS
    replied
    Originally posted by didi
    Even Dr Cole claimed 60% donor regeneration and never supplied any evidence to support the claim. I think Dr mwamba found idea interesting and jumped on bandwagon since everybody is multiplying these days. No one showed any evidence that they can multiply hairs, its baffling.
    It's not really baffling. While hair transplant surgeons are far from the smartest guys around, they're not that stupid They know that a single conclusive documented case of hair multiplication is worth more than pages and pages of pretty results.

    If you're truly multiplying hair, the first thing you do is prove it conclusively. The money will roll in after that and they know that.

    Leave a comment:

Working...