Tweet
My turning point was when I asked Kristel about getting a 2nd HST to densify my recipient. She replied that she would advise me not to do it, cause maybe I would need the donor later on for some area's that could use it better. If donor would really regenerate 80%, that comment made 0 sense. So that's when I started to doubt HASCI. And then the evidence just kept piling up against them. Anyway, let's forget about HASCI, let's focus on Mwamba and Nigams here.
-
-
Still no word from Hasci? I hope dr Gho realizes how important this is for his international reputation and for his business.Comment
-
Compilation of Nigam Claims and Results
Nigam has been around the forum for some time now.
I feel we should use this thread to compile his results and his claims.
Please don't insert your hopes, assumptions, or guesses....results and quotations of nigams only (w proper links)
I will go through nigams online discussion history later, anybody else who has time should do the same.Comment
-
You mean without any visible signs in the donor?
Regardless of whether or not a patient has either a very low or an exceptional dense donor before having any HT, in any case: 1-2 times.
Thereafter, they simply can NOT guarantee you anymore, that you will see "absolutely nothing"; especially, IF you intend to shave your head down to the bone - that's at least what they immediately told me during my first phone call last year. But indeed:
Try to imagine a guy with a rather low donor density, and they extract just around 1000 grafts; now let's say 30% of these 1000 extraction sites will not produce any HAIR-regeneration - that creates already around 300 hairless gaps, and that can be huge already for such guys (guys with a very very low donor density).Comment
-
no, I received the answer that Gho choice or politic is to ignore forums reactions and bashers (cause it's a neverending story).
My mails were forwarded to Gho by Pierre,the french correspondent... but never received a reply.
This Pierre just shared his own personal view and told me that he talked with technicians who treated the 9HST case and that it was not a lie...ok but do we have to take words for granted (I can also bring a paper saying that I paid you 9400 euros, you will still need my money)
So again, no picture, I said picture would be far more eloquent then anything... we say the same to Nigam.
It did not help, the debunking and the counter-study of Arashi was never mentioned, and Arashi is rather considered obsessive and not constructive.
So, voilà, same thing, same story, you take their words or you just go to hell.
Still, I don't know what to think, I am less confident in them, but I would not bash, because we don't really know and GC case is a successful case... to me.
I said to Pierre that eventough I will still consider them as the only option in 2013, which is true, their communication sucks at a certain level.
and I guess, this 85% regeneration will remain a mystery.
This experiment stopped me from rushing to them for multiple session which I was ready for.... I have the budget for another five or six sessions, easy... but I was disappointed by the answers and the lack of real evidence that would have shut everybody's mouth here (which I really hope they would bring).
Anyway, I'm on hold, if I need another and there is nothing else cutting edge, I would still vote for them.... but ignoring or eluding some crucial questions was again, not fair from them.
Up to optimistic to trust, pessimistic to bash and neutral to wait and see. (I used to be very very optimistic, I became neutral, bashing is no option for me, I don't trust they would run something so big and official out of lie and fraud, they would have gone bankrupt since a while)Comment
-
Incidentally, what happened about all the hair transplant surgeons supposedly being trained to carry out the HST procedure, and all the clinics supposedly becoming licencees?Comment
Comment