US government owned patent on hair follicle neogensis

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • TJT
    replied
    Originally posted by dutchguyhanging
    this is exactly why u should not go to the hairloss summit. U may be the oldest user in this forum and may know current treatments but ur approach is totally juvenile. if someone finds the cure 1-he/she will be the richest person alive, we are talking billions of eur stuck in this market 2- fame will come along as you will be solving the equation which hasnt been solved over 2016years. money, fame, prestige... one of them will attract you. But you talk like 15 years old kid... unbelievable...
    Couldn't have said it better. The "nobody cares about male hair loss" thing is inane. It's tantamount to saying "nobody cares about making billions". Yeah, right....

    Leave a comment:


  • DepressedByHairLoss
    replied
    Originally posted by Hemo
    Don't you think a team that was responsible for essentially curing something as serious as hair loss would be employed for awhile? You're talking about a multi-billion dollar industry, and the company that discovered it could likely survive on that treatment alone.

    I think it's less conspiracy and more that administrative costs are so high, so only a relatively small % of funding actually gets to researchers. There are companies that misuse funds, but it's catching up with more and more of them.
    You have some points with regards to hair loss. But the main thing that I believe it is in the financial self-interest of the vast majority of the hair restoration industry to maintain the status quo. This is evidenced by their extreme lack of effort to pursue any new and more mainstream treatment.

    But I believe that my point in my previous point does in fact hold true for other areas of the medical and pharmaceutical industry. Since that industry is profit-driven, they can make so much more money creating continual treatments rather than cures. I mean, I think of how many once-a-day pills that big pharma has produced (they saturate TV with their ads) and how few (if any) cures they have produced, and their motives become very clear to me.

    Leave a comment:


  • dutchguyhanging
    replied
    Originally posted by hellouser
    Probably. Why would he bother with hair loss when he's got a full head of hair? He should be out enjoying a fullhead life.
    this is exactly why u should not go to the hairloss summit. U may be the oldest user in this forum and may know current treatments but ur approach is totally juvenile. if someone finds the cure 1-he/she will be the richest person alive, we are talking billions of eur stuck in this market 2- fame will come along as you will be solving the equation which hasnt been solved over 2016years. money, fame, prestige... one of them will attract you. But you talk like 15 years old kid... unbelievable...

    Leave a comment:


  • DepressedByHairLoss
    replied
    Originally posted by Hemo
    Don't you think a team that was responsible for essentially curing something as serious as hair loss would be employed for awhile? You're talking about a multi-billion dollar industry, and the company that discovered it could likely survive on that treatment alone.

    I think it's less conspiracy and more that administrative costs are so high, so only a relatively small % of funding actually gets to researchers. There are companies that misuse funds, but it's catching up with more and more of them.
    You have some points with regards to hair loss. But the main thing that I believe it is in the financial self-interest of the vast majority of the hair restoration industry to maintain the status quo. This is evidenced by their extreme lack of effort to pursue any new and more mainstream treatment.

    But I believe that my point in my previous point does in fact hold true for other areas of the medical and pharmaceutical industry. Since that industry is profit-driven, they can make so much more money creating continual treatments rather than cures. I mean, I think of how many once-a-day pills that big pharma has produced (they saturate TV with their ads) and how few (if any) cures they have produced, and their motives become very clear to me.

    Leave a comment:


  • Hemo
    replied
    Originally posted by DepressedByHairLoss
    I've been touting this discovery for years: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qc3fPeNZooA. Where they already grew skin in a burn victim. I was interested because I thought a similar method could perhaps be used to regrow hair. I am very skeptical about the research, medical, and pharmaceutical industry, and I wonder if they keep "researching" diseases and conditions to keep plenty of people employed and generate huge profits rather than find a cure to anything. I've heard Bernie Sanders echo similar sentiments on the campaign trail. He too is skeptical and wants evidence that all of this "research money" is actually put towards finding cures.
    Don't you think a team that was responsible for essentially curing something as serious as hair loss would be employed for awhile? You're talking about a multi-billion dollar industry, and the company that discovered it could likely survive on that treatment alone.

    I think it's less conspiracy and more that administrative costs are so high, so only a relatively small % of funding actually gets to researchers. There are companies that misuse funds, but it's catching up with more and more of them.

    Leave a comment:


  • DepressedByHairLoss
    replied
    I've been touting this discovery for years: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qc3fPeNZooA. Where they already grew skin in a burn victim. I was interested because I thought a similar method could perhaps be used to regrow hair. I am very skeptical about the research, medical, and pharmaceutical industry, and I wonder if they keep "researching" diseases and conditions to keep plenty of people employed and generate huge profits rather than find a cure to anything. I've heard Bernie Sanders echo similar sentiments on the campaign trail. He too is skeptical and wants evidence that all of this "research money" is actually put towards finding cures.

    Leave a comment:


  • hellouser
    replied
    Originally posted by lacazette
    the Stratagraft is the 3D skin tissue currently use in the army trial for burned soldiers we were talking

    Stratatech Gets $247M from BARDA to Develop Skin Tissue for Thermal Burns

    Stratatech has received a contract of up to $247 million from the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA), part of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of the […]


    Stratatech has received a contract of up to $247 million from the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA), part of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response.

    The contract is for the development of StrataGraft® skin tissue, the company’s skin replacement product, as a medical countermeasure to treat patients with severe thermal burns.

    Clinical studies will enable Stratatech to file a BLA with the Food and Drug Administration for the commercial marketing of StrataGraft tissue, and confirm efficacy in all key patient populations."
    247 million dollars.... wow...

    Leave a comment:


  • Renee
    replied
    Does there new skin include hair?

    Leave a comment:


  • lacazette
    replied
    the Stratagraft is the 3D skin tissue currently use in the army trial for burned soldiers we were talking

    Stratatech Gets $247M from BARDA to Develop Skin Tissue for Thermal Burns

    Stratatech has received a contract of up to $247 million from the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA), part of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of the […]


    Stratatech has received a contract of up to $247 million from the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA), part of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response.

    The contract is for the development of StrataGraft® skin tissue, the company’s skin replacement product, as a medical countermeasure to treat patients with severe thermal burns.

    Clinical studies will enable Stratatech to file a BLA with the Food and Drug Administration for the commercial marketing of StrataGraft tissue, and confirm efficacy in all key patient populations."

    Leave a comment:


  • baldybald
    replied
    Originally posted by xyz123
    Yeah - it looks like he's working on cancer now: https://uk.linkedin.com/in/aarongardnerlinkedin

    Hopefully there's another smart post-doc that's taken his place in the Jahoda lab.
    That is why it is difficult to find a cure for baldness. A very few researches are going on for hairloss comparing to other diseases. It is not difficult to beat hairloss and cure balding becaus hair follicle has a simple structure comparing to the rest of the body tissues.

    Leave a comment:


  • xyz123
    replied
    Originally posted by joachim
    somewhere i've read that dr. gardner left the hair research field =(
    Yeah - it looks like he's working on cancer now: https://uk.linkedin.com/in/aarongardnerlinkedin

    Hopefully there's another smart post-doc that's taken his place in the Jahoda lab.

    Leave a comment:


  • hellouser
    replied
    Originally posted by joachim
    somewhere i've read that dr. gardner left the hair research field =(
    Probably. Why would he bother with hair loss when he's got a full head of hair? He should be out enjoying a fullhead life.

    Leave a comment:


  • joachim
    replied
    Originally posted by Desmond84
    I think at this point, we can safely assume cell-based therapies for AGA will not be widely available to most people till 2020. Even Shiseido's RCH-01 if released by 2018 with no more delays will have a very limited roll-out and will require multiple trips to Japan for one or more sessions. This makes it extremely expensive for those looking at the medical tourism option especially people in Europe & US.

    On a more positive note though, the DP conundrum may be solved before the end of this year by Aaron Gartner or Lauster. We just can't lose hope. And if they do crack it, expect it to be on the market within 5-6 yrs And that is the FULL CURE. A single session and you can permanently rock that mohawk :P
    somewhere i've read that dr. gardner left the hair research field =(

    Leave a comment:


  • Desmond84
    replied
    I think at this point, we can safely assume cell-based therapies for AGA will not be widely available to most people till 2020. Even Shiseido's RCH-01 if released by 2018 with no more delays will have a very limited roll-out and will require multiple trips to Japan for one or more sessions. This makes it extremely expensive for those looking at the medical tourism option especially people in Europe & US.

    On a more positive note though, the DP conundrum may be solved before the end of this year by Aaron Gartner or Lauster. We just can't lose hope. And if they do crack it, expect it to be on the market within 5-6 yrs And that is the FULL CURE. A single session and you can permanently rock that mohawk :P

    Leave a comment:


  • Renee
    replied
    Nothing exciting in that email. Just proves they are no where close to even doing clinical trials, they haven't solved the issues yet. If any other researcher cracks the code today he still needs at least 5 years to bring it to market. Sooo disappointing!

    Leave a comment:

Working...