Payday...I would not agree with all you said. Of course we need to be cautious and wait for more evidence, and that is what we are doing right now, and that is why we insist that we see more NW7 cases. But Dr. Nigam is the only one that has to prove something last 10 years, I'm excited but I'm not over excited, just so that I'm too careful and possibly disappointment will not throw me into a depression as it was earlier. If Dr. Nigam cheats all the time (and I hope it is not so) .... then he cheats himself.
DR. Nigam.... We keep crossed fingers, good luck tomorrow.
-
That's probably why he said "I don't really have an opinion on Nigam yet, waiting to see more proof".
But yeah, there are people here on this board who already see Dr Nigam as our saviour. Maybe he is, but I'd really need to see a lot more proof. Tomorrow's venture is a great start. If a NW6 follows with a 4000-5000 grafts procedure, THEN it starts to really get interesting !Leave a comment:
-
I personally think that his is a very sad comment that shows how desperate young hair loss guys can be. Do you guys even know the history of Dr. Nigam's practice? Where did he come from and where did he train in hair transplants? Can anyone in the scientific community vouch for him? Anyone?
Why is he spending so much time on hair loss forums fighting with people and trying to prove his concept to young, desperate, strangers who can only do one thing for him, and that is potentially pay him for his services.
If he is able to do what he claims, it will be public knowledge. The scientific community would really be involved with him. So far all we have is a bunch of snapshots taken at various conferences to prove that he is legit. Do you really think that this proves anything?
All I'm saying is that everyone needs to be cautious. Let's just see how things play out before declaring Dr. Nigam our savior. Be smart.Leave a comment:
-
nice little story you got there, i almost shed a tear. but still no valid reason to act like a complete moron all the time.Leave a comment:
-
I just think he was screwed over a million times by a million doctors and finally found one, Dr. Gho, that is doing something good for him. Now he likes to promote the one doctor that he found trustworthy and doesn't want others to get screwed over like he had in the past. (not saying Dr. Nigam is a doctor that would screw someone over, I don't really have an opinion on Nigam yet, waiting to see more proof)
Side note, if Nigam opened a clinic in the US for donor doubling I'd be the first in line.Leave a comment:
-
in the past he used to be quite the critical poster. always asking great questions. then he went to gho and from that moment on, he hates everybody who is not gho, especially people who are willing to sacrifice their own precious time and hard earned money to find us a cure. sometimes it's quite annoying, but mostly really pathetic. we should pray for this man and hopefully, one day he will regain his sanity.Leave a comment:
-
Best of luck, and God Speed Dr. Nigam and Tom.
I am sending positive thoughts.Leave a comment:
-
-
may i ask why this user keeps this attitude against this Dr who tries to do something we didint see decades?
i mean commn now. we must be supportive. we all have a problem to solve here,Leave a comment:
-
-
-
Yes ,i think, close up macro pics of small areas,to count singles/doubles/triples.
More clear..microscopic pics...
tmr ,i will check with photographer.. personally...zoom in have a look ,whether we can count singles/ doubles/triples clearly...
Initially..the extraction marks will be visible in microscopic pics..we can map it..problem of tracking will arise when tom's hair grow back long at the donor.
Mapping by following every graft ,at particular area at donor is ok..but to map complete donor...will take a lot of time ...
And i do not think tom will shave his donor in the future..
Tom does not want to shave much...i will see tmr..after measuring his density at donor graft/ per sqcm...the recipient area was approx. 50 sqcms..
With a density of 40 at the anterior transition zone of hair line..and density of 50 at posterior area of hair line..avg 45 sqcms..
I will need lesser than 2000grafts..as some grafts will be made singles for anterior hairline..after trimming.
and triples will have to be made double for posterior hair line...
After extraction..i will come to know ,how many singles,doubles and triples do we get...
For hairline we will need approx.500-800 singles for anterior part of hairline..and 800 to 1200 doubles for posterior part of hair line....
Final figure tmr..as we both agree on exact hair line design...
Hairline new area is slick..as it is lowered..should not be difficult to monitor..except few grafts which will be dispersed into his existing anterior hairline...
Don't you think..the microscopic pics can also be used by mapping or following all the grafts in the micro pic,with connecting lines..for their before after position and placement...
It's good ,i took the rehearsal pics today...
are not clear either (and not all of the links work !), focus is sometimes on one half of the picture for example. Besides it's difficult without tattoo's to see what is what region and to link them all together.
No, best is just to have 4 macro pictures of the whole area, (much) more close up than the previous ones.[/QUOTE]Leave a comment:
-
Most of the microscopic pictures are not clear either (and not all of the links work !), focus is sometimes on one half of the picture for example. Besides it's difficult without tattoo's to see what is what region and to link them all together.
No, best is just to cut up the donor area in 4 and make macro pictures of each of those 4 area's, much closer with the camera to the scalp, so detail is good enough to really see how many hairs each graft has. Micro pictures can then be used a support of that, although like said it's going to be difficult to map the whole area without tattoo's in the case of micro pictures, since you have so many of them.Leave a comment:
-
Arashi, we have micro-photographs of the donor in the region, if that's what you meant.
As for me, Tom is not a candidate for any procedure, but each piece of evidence and every patient is a step forward. In any case, Dr. Nigam thanks to hard work and dedication to invest in order to prove and improve the HM. Good luck tomorrowLeave a comment:
Leave a comment: