DR NIGAM, re: Tom Vercetti, the French Moderator

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • gc83uk
    replied
    Originally posted by FearTheLoss
    I'm all for Dr. Nigam and what he is doing, I think it is great and I would like to believe he is an honest, good intentioned man.

    But your comment about HASCI is ridiculous, I too am upset they messed up the test, but I really think they could give a shit less about it. They don't have time to do this stuff. Why? Because they are booked out well in advance and have no unhappy patients so far...I think that speaks for itself.

    However, I do believe their regeneration rate may be a bit lower than the 80% they claim...somewhere around 65-70%...but still the best out there that we know of, unless Nigam changes that with proof.

    i.e. no photoshopped pictures, honest claims backed up..

    That all being said, I hope the best for Nigam and I'm looking forward to his proof... If he is what he says he is, I will be the first to congratulate him, head over for a procedure myself and tell all my friends about him.

    At the end of the day mate, people like Didi are trolls and love to bash Gho to suit their own agenda. Everybody knows it.

    I on the other hand prefer to keep an open mind and give everyone a chance.

    Scrutiny has a big part to play too.

    Leave a comment:


  • gc83uk
    replied
    Originally posted by didi
    seriously guys, show some respect for this Dr, we should be grateful to have him here willing to answer questions and present cases, do free tests

    Gaz, since you are so harsh and critical type of person why don't you send couple of emails to hasci and tell them how you really feel about them screwing 2 tests in a month time..hasci seem quite comfortable with keeping people in dark, whereas nigam is quite the opposite, he is doing tests for us, send him anybody he wont turn him down bc his hair is too thick and cant do 3 hair grafts, etc..


    they could learn a lot from dr nigam
    Have you lost your mind? If I'm so critical then why am I talking with Dr Nigam over email and trying to help him with analysis?

    Instead of asking people to email Hasci for you, why don't you go and do it yourself.

    Seriously some people like to argue for the sake of it, time wasters ppl.

    Leave a comment:


  • gc83uk
    replied
    Originally posted by The Alchemist
    Good come back, kid. Treat the Dr with some decency, he's on here trying to help and you were acting rude and making demands of him as if he owes you something...which he certainly doesn't.
    Shut your yap!

    Leave a comment:


  • FearTheLoss
    replied
    I'm all for Dr. Nigam and what he is doing, I think it is great and I would like to believe he is an honest, good intentioned man.

    But your comment about HASCI is ridiculous, I too am upset they messed up the test, but I really think they could give a shit less about it. They don't have time to do this stuff. Why? Because they are booked out well in advance and have no unhappy patients so far...I think that speaks for itself.

    However, I do believe their regeneration rate may be a bit lower than the 80% they claim...somewhere around 65-70%...but still the best out there that we know of, unless Nigam changes that with proof.

    i.e. no photoshopped pictures, honest claims backed up..

    That all being said, I hope the best for Nigam and I'm looking forward to his proof... If he is what he says he is, I will be the first to congratulate him, head over for a procedure myself and tell all my friends about him.

    Leave a comment:


  • didi
    replied
    seriously guys, show some respect for this Dr, we should be grateful to have him here willing to answer questions and present cases, do free tests

    Gaz, since you are so harsh and critical type of person why don't you send couple of emails to hasci and tell them how you really feel about them screwing 2 tests in a month time..hasci seem quite comfortable with keeping people in dark, whereas nigam is quite the opposite, he is doing tests for us, send him anybody he wont turn him down bc his hair is too thick and cant do 3 hair grafts, etc..


    they could learn a lot from dr nigam

    Leave a comment:


  • The Alchemist
    replied
    Originally posted by gc83uk
    Shut your yap? lol you must be at least over 50.

    If you had read hairsite you would have seen I have commented over there on the very subject and you'll also have noticed he is struggling to match the two photos he originally analysed. You'll also notice he is sending me the originals via email.

    When did I ask him to put them up faster that he gets them?

    Exactly!
    Good come back, kid. Treat the Dr with some decency, he's on here trying to help and you were acting rude and making demands of him as if he owes you something...which he certainly doesn't.

    Leave a comment:


  • Arashi
    replied
    Originally posted by gc83uk
    Scratch that mate, just checked my inbox and Nigam has sent them over to me by email. Let me know if you want them and I'll email them over to you. I think it'll be pretty interesting case!
    Would be great if you could add them to your dropbox. Thx !

    Leave a comment:


  • gc83uk
    replied
    Originally posted by Arashi
    Hmmm can't find the photo's myself anymore neither. I think dr Nigams changed one of his posts, cause they were there. The first post of this thread: http://www.baldtruthtalk.com/showthread.php?t=12707 got the photo's but they're only thumbnails.

    @Dr Nigams can you maybe repost the links to the full sized pictures ? Thanks !
    Scratch that mate, just checked my inbox and Nigam has sent them over to me by email. Let me know if you want them and I'll email them over to you. I think it'll be pretty interesting case!

    Leave a comment:


  • Arashi
    replied
    Originally posted by gc83uk
    Can you do me a favour mate if you don't mind? I've gone round in cirlces with this, can you link me the macro before photo? There is about 6 thread on HS and at least 2 over here on Nigam.

    Is there a comparable pic too? I noticed Dr Nigam said on HS that he couldn't match up his after photo with the before photo, so I take it we have to wait for a new after photo?

    Is there also a pic AFTER the bisected parts have been implanted into the donor immediately after surgery?
    Hmmm can't find the photo's myself anymore neither. I think dr Nigams changed one of his posts, cause they were there. The first post of this thread: http://www.baldtruthtalk.com/showthread.php?t=12707 got the photo's but they're only thumbnails.

    @Dr Nigams can you maybe repost the links to the full sized pictures ? Thanks !

    Leave a comment:


  • gc83uk
    replied
    Originally posted by Arashi
    I'm not sure I understand what you're saying here, Gaz. We have good pre-op photo's of the donor, including macro photo's. Hence it's just going to be a matter of comparing this photo to new post-op macro photo's of the donor and we can exactly see how many hairs there are left. Same for recipient.
    Can you do me a favour mate if you don't mind? I've gone round in cirlces with this, can you link me the macro before photo? There is about 6 thread on HS and at least 2 over here on Nigam.

    Is there a comparable pic too? I noticed Dr Nigam said on HS that he couldn't match up his after photo with the before photo, so I take it we have to wait for a new after photo?

    Is there also a pic AFTER the bisected parts have been implanted into the donor immediately after surgery?

    Leave a comment:


  • Arashi
    replied
    Originally posted by 534623
    Seems Gaz is using the same language like Kristel ... lol
    Hihi. Now that's funny, man !

    Leave a comment:


  • 534623
    replied
    Originally posted by Arashi

    I'm not sure I understand what you're saying here, Gaz.
    Seems Gaz is using the same language like Kristel ... lol

    Leave a comment:


  • Arashi
    replied
    Originally posted by gc83uk
    Woahhh, why not? I thought you wanted to share everything!

    Dr Nigam, it's very important that YOU upload your photo of Toms Donor before Tom uploads anything! We need to see a photo of at least 50 grafts before extraction and of course another photo immediately after the extractions showing these same grafts, remember it needs to be at least 50, just like I did with Gho. And because your reimplanting "something" back in the donor, then we'll need the third photo right after the implanting of donor of the same group of grafts of course.

    Then a few days weeks later we ask Tom to upload his photos to compare with your work. This is how you document it.

    Anything else is just not going to work IMO. Anybody want to tell me I'm wrong here?
    I'm not sure I understand what you're saying here, Gaz. We have good pre-op photo's of the donor, including macro photo's. Hence it's just going to be a matter of comparing this photo to new post-op macro photo's of the donor and we can exactly see how many hairs there are left. Same for recipient.

    Leave a comment:


  • gc83uk
    replied
    Originally posted by The Alchemist
    ...all the photos he has were up on hairsite, which he already stated. And He's putting the new photos up as he gets them. They can't be put up any faster than he gets them - understand? He's explained it numerous times...so shut your yap.
    Shut your yap? lol you must be at least over 50.

    If you had read hairsite you would have seen I have commented over there on the very subject and you'll also have noticed he is struggling to match the two photos he originally analysed. You'll also notice he is sending me the originals via email.

    When did I ask him to put them up faster that he gets them?

    Exactly!

    Leave a comment:


  • Pentarou
    replied
    Originally posted by Boldy
    IM knows very well that if nigams succeeds with his DP culture method (unlimited new follicles), people will be cured..


    conflict of interest.
    Trufax.

    Leave a comment:

Working...