Dr Nigams - NSN Donor regeneration!

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Arashi
    replied
    Originally posted by didi
    judge him on nsn results
    Which uptil now we have NOT seen (except for that area around that mole, but that's the obvious area to conduct fraud on).

    Leave a comment:


  • didi
    replied
    look guys

    dr nigam started off on da wrong foot, no doubt abt it but we dont need to dwell on it,
    he is improving rapidly,

    judge him on nsn results, he is not nigams man and thats the most important thing for us to know

    Leave a comment:


  • 534623
    replied
    Originally posted by Arashi
    Hehe, j/k-ing, not going to steal his domain. But man, pay your bills in time Dr Nigam.
    Sorry - he can't; buying "trail subjects" is costly ...

    I wonder how long it will take until we have to donate and to send packed lunchs to Dr. Nigam's house. I think I will donate every week 1 Wiener Schnitzel and some Leberkässemmel.

    Leave a comment:


  • 534623
    replied
    Originally posted by Arashi
    "This domain name expired on Apr 02 2013 12:13PM
    Click here to renew it."
    At least didi's uploaded pics are still there (besides all my own screen shots from "the early Nigam-days" including all the bold claims):

    Leave a comment:


  • Arashi
    replied
    Hehe, j/k-ing, not going to steal his domain. But man, pay your bills in time Dr Nigam.

    Leave a comment:


  • Arashi
    replied
    Originally posted by 534623

    "This domain name expired on Apr 02 2013 12:13PM
    Click here to renew it."

    LOOOOL. Quickly, who can register his domain, this should be FUN

    Leave a comment:


  • 534623
    replied
    Originally posted by didi

    if dr nigam really delivers what he promissed(doubling+real HM)
    Do you know what he claimed BEFORE he ever mentioned the first time "doubling"?

    Pffffff...

    Here is what you yourself reported just a few month ago ...
    Originally posted by didi

    Leave a comment:


  • Arashi
    replied
    But Dr Nigam didn't only have photoshopped pictures on his website, he lied about his weightloss clinic (claiming it was his wife's, since there were tons of complaints against it, but he was caught on Indian TV claiming that it was actually HIS company). He also defended these photoshopped pictures to be real when he got confronted with them (until he couldn't deny they were fake anymore). And then there are these really pathetic attacks against Dr Gho, with for example that picture of NSN's scalp where he drew all kinds of circles, claiming it was failed regeneration, while most obviously he just randomly drew circles. But also by misrepresenting and totally exaggerating what NSN said, uptil the point where NSN said that Dr Nigam should retract these statements since they were simply not true.

    So yeah, tons of reasons to be very VERY skeptical here. But Didi already KNOWS Dr Nigam is for real, so I'm assuming he's currently packing his bags and we'll soon see his photo's from his visit to India

    Leave a comment:


  • didi
    replied
    if dr nigam really delivers what he promissed(doubling+real HM)
    it will be the biggest comeback in history of hair loss industry

    from fotoshopped images to hair multiplication in 6 months

    fingers crossed

    Leave a comment:


  • Arashi
    replied
    Originally posted by hellouser
    Can someone show me these 'photoshopped' pictures???
    Sure. He posted these 2 on his website:



    If you compare them, the before and after photo are EXACTLY the same, pixel for pixel, except the hair, LOL.

    Leave a comment:


  • hellouser
    replied
    Originally posted by JJJJrS
    I'm not implying that you said that. This is just a general observation I had after looking at the photos.

    And I agree about the skepticism. I still remember the photoshopped pictures which is why I'm surprised to suddenly see results like this.

    In the end though, the most important thing is evidence. If Nigam supplies enough over time than that will speak for itself.
    Can someone show me these 'photoshopped' pictures???

    Leave a comment:


  • 534623
    replied
    Originally posted by JJJJrS
    The FM technique usually results in 20-70% donor regeneration according to Gho. In this case Nigam has achieved 88% regeneration.

    Of course, these pictures don't mean much without including the recipient but it's more than I expected.
    pfffff - simply cut off the distal part (the upper-most part) from grafts and you will get 100% regeneration in every idiot (patient) or "show-case" and every extraction hole - especially if you hear someone claiming "we could see regrowth just after 1 day".

    Or did you see neversaynever's WHOLE donor area ...


    ... shortly and even day-by-day after extractions as everybody could see this in my and gc's case? No.

    You guys through around all fictiv numbers and percentages and believe everything is real and "is THE number for each and every patient and procedure" - and just because they see a smal pic of a very small test area or can read simply bold claims - from an extremely questionable source, in addition. Whereby the 'questionable source' has desperate need to prove something.

    Sometimes I really wonder whether or not there is a causal relationship between hair loss and stupidness.

    Leave a comment:


  • Arashi
    replied
    Originally posted by JJJJrS
    In the end though, the most important thing is evidence. If Nigam supplies enough over time than that will speak for itself.
    Agreed and exactly my point. We need evidence, not words.

    Leave a comment:


  • JJJJrS
    replied
    Originally posted by Arashi
    My point never was that the pictures were manipulated. My point is that if I were a doctor who wanted to commit fraud, then I'd make sure I'd leave the grafts in that focus area, around the mole, in tact, to ensure 100% regrowth.

    Again, I'm really not saying Dr Nigam is a fraud, at this point I'm kind of 50/50. Could be, could be not. Just saying that after all we've seen from him that skepticism is needed.
    I'm not implying that you said that. This is just a general observation I had after looking at the photos.

    And I agree about the skepticism. I still remember the photoshopped pictures which is why I'm surprised to suddenly see results like this.

    In the end though, the most important thing is evidence. If Nigam supplies enough over time than that will speak for itself.

    Leave a comment:


  • hellouser
    replied
    Originally posted by JJJJrS
    The FM technique usually results in 20-70% donor regeneration according to Gho. In this case Nigam has achieved 88% regeneration.

    Of course, these pictures don't mean much without including the recipient but it's more than I expected.
    That sounds right with Dr. Cole's assessment that on average 50% were regenerating.

    Leave a comment:

Working...