Dr Nigams - NSN Donor regeneration!
Collapse
X
-
For one, you were very reluctant to start analyzing recipient as well. It just makes perfect sense to not only look at donor but also at recipient. That's why in my book you're biased. But then again, nobody is really neutral, everybody has his own take on reality. You do, I do, Didi does. But my point is that Didi is just spreading all kinds of weird, twisted, unfunded statements about both doctors. That just does not make any sense or helps discussion at all. -
-
That's just a fact. This research company does interesting work and has exposed tons of Chinese fraudulent companies: http://www.muddywatersresearch.com/research/
But my point was not that all Chinese companies are fraud, the majority is not. My point was that you just can't be naive and trust words. We need solid proof, especially after the photoshopped picture and his lies about his weightloss clinic.Leave a comment:
-
people stop arguing like that, i do not see what the problem is, if nigam is the same or better than ghoo and proves with pictures he is welcome.
we are loosing hair , someone to save us from the situation of being bald sometime is good thing, why fight who is going to be i dont understandLeave a comment:
-
this forum is hilarious
Iron man
how come you dont know that gho is chinese, even didi knows that(also some other hasci dr/s are chinese descent)....how do I knw all that you wonder
and arashi said lot of chinese companies are scam....Leave a comment:
-
Which lab ? All we've seen are some photo's of his microscope. And what makes you think he paid for the equipment himself and not some investor/bank loaned it to him ?
he is milioanire already
this guy is onto something
"Ironman in my opinion is Gho-biased"
Arashi, 2nd of April 2013Leave a comment:
-
his german labs cost more than that,
he is milioanire already, he aims higher
this guy is onto something
BTW, this is statement of the year
"Ironman in my opinion is Gho-biased"
Arashi, 2nd of April 2013Leave a comment:
-
Really? I didn't know that Dr. Gho is a Chinese.
And that is completely "normal" for you:
Making claims simply out of his ass.
If I would charge you $100 for every misleading claim you make out of your ass - I would be richer than "rich".Leave a comment:
-
If Nigam could just get 125 naive people like you to his clinic, charge them $8000 for 2000 grafts, then he's made a million USD, which by Indian standard surely is enough to retire.Leave a comment:
-
And that is just not true. This is what I mean, you make all kind of twisted weird statements about Gho, while we have tons of evidence. Look at the 3 extremely well documented and researched treatments of GC83UK. But there are tons of other Gho patients here, some documented their cases, others didnt, but everybody is happy. And you say otherwise ?Leave a comment:
-
arashi
same could be said abt gho, he is chinese btw
we havent proven that he isnt scamming people..true? just bc its scarless doesnt mean its what he says it is..most fue doctors think he is hoax
you seem sold on hst but doubt others, i can sense bias...or are you just stpid or naive
nigam is not publicly listed company, doesnt need propaganda to temporarily inflate share prices,
would he be so stupid to waste all his time and money on something he doesnt believe in? he knows that he is under spotlight and needs to deliever, he wont get single western customer unless he is legit, he knows that
he is not crazy to invest all these money into labs, equipment, miscoscope,etc for nothingLeave a comment:
-
Leave a comment:
-
-
Now I'm not saying Dr Nigam is a fraud. I'm just saying that after all that has happened, with the photoshopped picture on his website and the lies about his weightloss clinic, that we need to see SOLID evidence.
You present the birthmark photo as evidence, but what would you do if you were a fraud ? Wouldn't you just simulate extraction around that birthmark and leave the whole graft in tact ? That is why we need to see both pre-op photo's and post-op photo's of the WHOLE donor area.
At this point I'm just wondering if you're too stupid to understand all this or just too naive.Leave a comment:
-
But I don't expect that you know all this - I mean, everything about the history around culturing of dermal papilla cells and dermal papilla studies since more than 50 years - until today.
Just a well-known example (Intercytex/Dr. Jerry Cooley) ...
Often tried - never reached ...
btw - I find especially the following part from this "study" highly comical:
"FCI [follicular cell implantation] has often been referred to by the misnomers hair cloning or hair multiplication. These terms are misleading and fail to accurately describe what is meant by follicular cell implantation. In FCI, new follicles are induced by the cultured DP cells in conjunction with existing epidermis in the scalp, so that new follicles are a combination of the implanted cells and target epidermis. DP cells are not cloned, nor are whole follicles multiplied, although the idea that many new follicles are formed is correct."
But who the hell is talking today about "FCI"??
Here is what the father of "Hair Multiplication" has to say ...
Furthermore, I didn't know that you can't call normal 'cell division' OR provoked cell division due to culturing of cells as "cloning" of cells, because what else is it, if you try to get (in vivo or in vitro) more cells from a certain number of cells (parent cells) - especially, when these cells produce genetically completely identical daughter cells?
But who cares ...Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: