Dr Nigams - NSN Donor regeneration!

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • didi
    replied
    Originally posted by aim4hair
    Gho always made it very clear that there is limitation of the number of grafts he can extract in one session. When gho started he used to do just couple of hundreds grafts per session and till now most people still get less than 2k, plus gho doubles the hair by having it grow on both donor and recepient.
    nigam claims that there is no limitation to what he does, and he can extract thousands and double/tripple them and use them all on recepient aside plus using body hair.... Now if nigam claims are true, i don't see why he can't achieve in 9 months what gho couldnt achieve in years as per your claims.


    HST started in 2005...8 years...9 months between sessions..10 sessions you could fit into 8 years...
    he should have hundreads of nw6/5 to nw1 transformations...even if his first sessions started as 700 grafts...do the math

    something fishy about hst

    Leave a comment:


  • hellouser
    replied
    Originally posted by Conpecia
    Is it just the fact I'm looking at these photos on an iPhone or is there a hair trying to break through on that red mark in the second one? Meaning (allegedly) 100 percent regeneration?
    It looks like a very faint grey spot. There's no visible hair present though. But 8/9 hairs regrew, which is good.

    Leave a comment:


  • Conpecia
    replied
    Is it just the fact I'm looking at these photos on an iPhone or is there a hair trying to break through on that red mark in the second one? Meaning (allegedly) 100 percent regeneration?

    Leave a comment:


  • aim4hair
    replied
    Originally posted by hellouser
    I think for a NW6/7 its going to depend on risk; if his claims are bogus, does the patient risk ruining his donor and potentially destroy the scalp on the back of his head? Of course, I'm sure there will be many desperate men willing to be used as a guinea pig. But I think expecting a solid case in 9 or so months isn't too much to ask for (assuming healing and procedures can be done in such a relatively short time).
    I don't see why it's too much to ask for if his claims are true. Finding ppl who are willing to jump on his chair is no issue. Just like the "HT doctor" who had hair doubing of 5k grafts recently and had 10k grafts implanted on his receipient area according to dr. Nigam

    Leave a comment:


  • aim4hair
    replied
    Originally posted by didi
    maybe bc gho has been multiplying hair for 10+ years and we havent seen anyone over 5000 grafts...nigam just started in the field
    Gho always made it very clear that there is limitation of the number of grafts he can extract in one session. When gho started he used to do just couple of hundreds grafts per session and till now most people still get less than 2k, plus gho doubles the hair by having it grow on both donor and recepient.
    nigam claims that there is no limitation to what he does, and he can extract thousands and double/tripple them and use them all on recepient aside plus using body hair.... Now if nigam claims are true, i don't see why he can't achieve in 9 months what gho couldnt achieve in years as per your claims.

    Leave a comment:


  • hellouser
    replied
    Originally posted by aim4hair
    I just wonder why all ppl who were asking gho for nw7 to nw1 transformation are not requesting the same from nigam.
    According to nigam, in his doubling technique he can take 5k grafts, make them 10k and then either implant 10k in receipient or 5k in donor and 5k in receipient. Most donors contains more than 5k grafts, plus he uses body hair too. So he can easly extract 7k make them 14k and boooooom nw6 to nw1 or at least nw2 happens in 9 months.
    Plus he claims to do trippiling as well, so from 7k he can make 21k and give you the thickest hair you could ever have.
    So what is he waiting for? Should we expect such a transformation in 9 months ?
    I think for a NW6/7 its going to depend on risk; if his claims are bogus, does the patient risk ruining his donor and potentially destroy the scalp on the back of his head? Of course, I'm sure there will be many desperate men willing to be used as a guinea pig. But I think expecting a solid case in 9 or so months isn't too much to ask for (assuming healing and procedures can be done in such a relatively short time).

    Leave a comment:


  • didi
    replied
    maybe bc gho has been multiplying hair for 10+ years and we havent seen anyone over 5000 grafts...nigam just started in the field

    Leave a comment:


  • aim4hair
    replied
    I just wonder why all ppl who were asking gho for nw7 to nw1 transformation are not requesting the same from nigam.
    According to nigam, in his doubling technique he can take 5k grafts, make them 10k and then either implant 10k in receipient or 5k in donor and 5k in receipient. Most donors contains more than 5k grafts, plus he uses body hair too. So he can easly extract 7k make them 14k and boooooom nw6 to nw1 or at least nw2 happens in 9 months.
    Plus he claims to do trippiling as well, so from 7k he can make 21k and give you the thickest hair you could ever have.
    So what is he waiting for? Should we expect such a transformation in 9 months ?

    Leave a comment:


  • hellouser
    replied
    Originally posted by Arashi
    So if I read some more books, some day I'll be as smart as you and I can post a McDonald's video to demonstrate that Dr Nigam really isnt that evil as some may think ?
    Trolling won't get you far either.

    Leave a comment:


  • Arashi
    replied
    Originally posted by hellouser
    Selective reasoning strikes again! Hit the books, son.
    So if I read some more books, some day I'll be as smart as you and I can post a McDonald's video to demonstrate that Dr Nigam really isnt that evil as some may think ?

    Leave a comment:


  • hellouser
    replied
    Originally posted by Arashi
    You know what, I'm also done with this argument. Thanks for that mcDonald video where they retouched a hamburger by adjusting some lighting. Yeah that definately made me change my mind on Dr Nigam
    Selective reasoning strikes again! Hit the books, son.

    Leave a comment:


  • hellouser
    replied
    Originally posted by 534623
    That is not true - he is the proof:
    http://www.baldtruthtalk.com/showpos...&postcount=124
    Yeah, and it only took a BLUNT comment like that to see that I didn't approve of the pictures and now after reading the copy of both images presented, the whole argument is moot since both of them are leaning towards predictions where one CLEARLY states that.

    ENGLISH, learn it.

    Leave a comment:


  • Arashi
    replied
    Originally posted by hellouser
    You really are dense. Way to accept only a fraction of my argument and use whatever else to make your own senseless case. What a straw-man argument, you're wasting everyone's time here. Nobody is going to disagree with your discomfort at the doctored photographs, but you clearly have difficulty with reading comprehension.
    You know what, I'm also done with this argument. Thanks for that mcDonald video where they retouched a hamburger by adjusting some lighting. Yeah that definately made me change my mind on Dr Nigam

    Leave a comment:


  • hellouser
    replied
    Originally posted by Arashi
    Basically what Hellouser is saying is that I can start a clinic in cosmetic surgery, photoshop a bunch of nosejobs, boobjobs, facelifts, put em up on my website and then tell the "Advertising Standards Authority" when they knock on my door "what are you guys doing here, this is totally legal man, Hellouser told me so !"
    You really are dense. Way to accept only a fraction of my argument and use whatever else to make your own senseless case. What a straw-man argument, you're wasting everyone's time here. Nobody is going to disagree with your discomfort at the doctored photographs, but you clearly have difficulty with reading comprehension.

    Leave a comment:


  • Arashi
    replied
    Originally posted by hellouser
    Well for one, its not an advertisement, at least I don't think
    Read the title of that link I posted. "Star among celebs whose ads were banned over airbrushing" And you are here, lecturing us on semantics ?

    Leave a comment:

Working...