Ah, ok, that's why your post count is 5% less than mine, makes sense man 
Ok, cool. I know someone who likes to go to the airport and count planes. Everybody is entitled to a hobby I guess !
Not hairs, holes. Yeah I'm sure it can be a tedious job with lousy pictures. That's where Schweinhund actually could have been helpful. He DOES make outstanding pictures. Too bad he doesn't want to make useful pictures.
I think I've already explained 3 times that NOBODY ever had mentioned failed extractions here before. If I had known about this, I had shot the needed pictures myself of course.
I'm not comparing anything. IM's pictures are of a LOT higher quality than the ones I had posted. He has a good camera, I just shot mine with my cellphone. IM knows his photographing stuff, I don't care much about it. BUT for proving that hairs actually would grow back, my pictures were more than enough. Not sure what highres pictures would have added ...

I never said I didn't believe in donor regeneration. I'm only interested in seeing as many documented cases as possible.
I also don't think you even understand exactly what you want. From what I can gather, you want someone to map their entire donor area and count thousands of hairs.
The other thing that bothers me is that you want IM to do this when you just had your procedure yourself and could only give us a single small picture!
I was a little harsh when I called it useless, but you can't compare the pictures you provided with IM's.
Comment