The Ironman Procedure
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
-
And yes, if you're not a patient person, counting all these hairs could drive you crazyBut its definitely interesting to observe the regeneration process and of course a nice feeling when everything is done.
In addition to what Iron_Man said, you can often tell the regenerated hairs from the surrounding hairs just by observation. The regenerated hairs are much shorter than the surrounding hairs. For example, compare the length of hairs 76-82 to the surrounding hairs.Comment
-
Hehe, you didn't seem to care much about that before. But happy you finally seem to understand the concept and finally seem to believe regrowth is really happening, good for you !Comment
-
Regardless, it's always nice to get as much documentation as possible.Comment
-
So, just purely out of interest then, what did you learn from this case that you didn't know before ?Comment
-
I'm really not interested in arguing in circles again, because we had this exact conversation days ago. Up until now, gc83uk, has been the only case that provided a hair count of the donor area, other than Gho's published studies. If you don't see any value in documenting more than one case, that's fine, but most people would disagree.Comment
-
ah, the drug addict from Holland is speaking ...
Hey drug addict,
why can't you ask Kristel a really simple question:
"I paid 1600 grafts for my ugly bald recipient area. How many drills did the technicians make in my ugly head to get these 1600 grafts I paid?"
I guess even Kristel's children are able to understand this simple question.
If she is asking you why you ask over and over the same (bull)shit - simply tell her the truth: the drugs you take do not work properly.Comment
-
I'm really not interested in arguing in circles again, because we had this exact conversation days ago. Up until now, gc83uk, has been the only case that provided a hair count of the donor area, other than Gho's published studies. If you don't see any value in documenting more than one case, that's fine, but most people would disagree.I just find your reasoning very funny, that's all
Comment
-
ah, the drug addict from Holland is speaking ...
Hey drug addict,
why can't you ask Kristel a really simple question:
"I paid 1600 grafts for my ugly bald recipient area. How many drills did the technicians make in my ugly head to get these 1600 grafts I paid?"
I guess even Kristel's children are able to understand this simple question.
If she is asking you why you ask over and over the same (bull)shit - simply tell her the truth: the drugs you take do not work properly.
But on topic (although you don't seem to care about it), if HASCI doesn't even keep count of 1s, 2s and 3s, what makes you think they count the drill amount ? Did you notice them doing that ? We both know they didn't, so not sure why you're making such a fool out of yourself AGAIN ?Comment
-
But on topic (although you don't seem to care about it), if HASCI doesn't even keep count of 1s, 2s and 3s, what makes you think they count the drill amount ? Did you notice them doing that ? We both know they didn't, so not sure why you're making such a fool out of yourself AGAIN ?
And how do you know, that I don't know? Contrary to you - I know. So I don't know why you don't know. ah, I forgot - the crazy stuff you take ...Comment
-
I asked Kristel a lot of things. Like how much they paid the technicians to get them to work on your ugly stinking head. But asking them about stuff they don't know about doesn't make a lot of sense to me. I'm sure the voices in your head tell you otherwise though ..Comment
-
I just find you very funny. First you say you don't even know for sure if hair's regenerate, but now you say you studied GC83UK's case. Didn't believe that one ? Then you said you short hairs in mine and Tobian's pictures didn't mean anything. Now you claim that they actualy mean regrowth. You said scientifical arguments were needed but when one user asked on hairsite about failed extractions, you said a glance at the petridish and 3 lousy pictures of ironman's ugly misformed head were enoughI just find your reasoning very funny, that's all
I never said I didn't believe in donor regeneration. I'm only interested in seeing as many documented cases as possible.
I also don't think you even understand exactly what you want. From what I can gather, you want someone to map their entire donor area and count thousands of hairs. I just finished counting 126 extraction points and it was very, very tedious! I'm not going to count thousands of hairs without a financial incentive. Nor do I think you'll find a patient willing to map their head like that. If you can, that would be great and I wish you all the best with your analysis.
The other thing that bothers me is that you want IM to do this when you just had your procedure yourself and could only give us a single small picture! I was a little harsh when I called it useless, but you can't compare the pictures you provided with IM's. If you count his extraction points, you'll see that he's taken a picture of more than half of them, if you look at his two ear photos and scars. This is a huge part of his donor area. We would be able to see if he had thousands of extractions and he simply doesn't. The analysis is therefore more than worthwhile.Comment
-
Hey drug addict,
why can't you ask Kristel a really simple question:
"I paid 1600 grafts for my ugly bald recipient area. How many drills did the technicians make in my ugly head to get these 1600 grafts I paid?"
I guess even Kristel's children are able to understand this simple question.
guess why they ALWAYS make photos of each and every detail after every treatment step?
And yes, especially also from the hole donor area after extractions - so that such psychopaths like you can't talk bullshit thereafter.Comment
Comment