HASCI - -How well does it work? Now we'll be able to find out!

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • AlmostUndone
    replied
    I'm around 98% finished,

    Leave a comment:


  • AlmostUndone
    replied
    I have no need for encouragement. More time would be great!

    I reuploaded my progress into the previous link. Almost everything is now worked out (except for the front edge).

    Leave a comment:


  • Arashi
    replied
    Originally posted by AlmostUndone
    No. Plans. Surprised you asked.
    LOL. I didn't understand it neither, why would you want to go to HASCI Caddarick ? Haven't you seen AlmostUndone's research so far ?

    Well, you guys are extremely patient. See, I'm only halfways done with this yarn!
    Big respect you're even going on with this. You've already proven beyond reasonable doubt that this is a scam, I know how much work it is to get this done, big respect you're going until the end !

    Leave a comment:


  • AlmostUndone
    replied
    Originally posted by caddarik79
    thank you for the updates and your tedious and dedicated work, do you plan in having a second and third HST?
    No. Plans. Surprised you asked.



    Well, you guys are extremely patient. See, I'm only halfways done with this yarn!

    Link to image



    EDIT: It seems dropbox.com has changed this week. Because of that, it's possible none of my previously posted image links are currently visible. And I'm trying to make sure whether this recent link is either...

    Leave a comment:


  • caddarik79
    replied
    Originally posted by AlmostUndone
    Here come the right temple pics, with connections. If I could just find the time right now to go into the smallest details, that would be the end of our work. Links:

    Wounds

    After

    thank you for the updates and your tedious and dedicated work, do you plan in having a second and third HST?

    Leave a comment:


  • AlmostUndone
    replied
    Here come the right temple pics, with connections. If I could just find the time right now to go into the smallest details, that would be the end of our work. Links:

    Wounds

    After

    Leave a comment:


  • AlmostUndone
    replied
    Originally posted by Arashi
    Are you planning to count the right recipient part too ?
    I'm working on it. Optimistically it'll take 2 weeks first for the puzzle to come together. After that it'll be much work to locate each hair (having time might be the biggest challenge!)

    Leave a comment:


  • Arashi
    replied
    Originally posted by AlmostUndone
    The after-situation reveals 676 hairs grown out.
    Awesome work ! That seems to correlate pretty well with the donor where you counted:
    Originally posted by AlmostUndone
    I counted 1243 lost hairs in my donor.
    So we should see about 600-ish new hairs in your right recipient part, in which case no hair regeneration took place at all, but neither did a lot of hairs die, so it would then be a pretty well performed FUE.

    So far no surprises. Are you planning to count the right recipient part too ?

    Leave a comment:


  • AlmostUndone
    replied
    I made a promise for an update.

    Actually, the analysis for the left side of my recipient was just completed:

    Link


    The after-situation reveals 676 hairs grown out. Included was a total of 375 holes and wounds they made. And 1.8 hairs per hole/wound is the average. (You can find the numbers chart annexed within the image file.)

    There isn't much else to do there. I might still loot for some better quality "after" pics. Secondly, I find the doctor sometimes had the grafts placed very very close to still existing hairs; this would mean that included into the result are sometimes some original hairs which existed previously to the procedure. (For example, what about wound #183?) Nitpicking the "before procedure" -pics could tell us that the total of new hairs is slightly less than 676.

    Leave a comment:


  • long4hair
    replied
    Originally posted by Arashi
    Where I said '1 pic' I implied 'some pic'. I am not at home right now but I will post an example of what I mean.

    Anyway good to see you're working on this, I had given up hope to get a good analysis of recipient but we might get there now. Good luck!
    You did good work here Arishi. It's pretty apparent that HASCI is a failure at donor regeneration.

    Now we have to hope that Pilofocus will result in donor regeneration. I think there's a good chance Pilofocus will achieve good donor regeneraton. Are you going to do a Pilofocus hair transplant if Dr. Wesley reports excellent donor regeneration?

    And if Dr. Wesley reports excellent donor regeneration are you going to investigate his results like you're doing with HASCI?

    Leave a comment:


  • Arashi
    replied
    Originally posted by AlmostUndone
    Which one is pic one?
    Where I said '1 pic' I implied 'some pic'. I am not at home right now but I will post an example of what I mean.

    Anyway good to see you're working on this, I had given up hope to get a good analysis of recipient but we might get there now. Good luck!

    Leave a comment:


  • AlmostUndone
    replied
    Which one is pic one?

    Leave a comment:


  • Arashi
    replied
    Originally posted by AlmostUndone
    What are you talking about angles, angles? I used those same wound pictures, and the angles seem to match very well with the after-pictures. Just look:
    Link

    I'm not quite done yet (still working on the purple guidelines/flocculation). Everything was done from scratch.
    Hey, great work ! I'm also happy that you're starting from scratch. One of my problems was that there are still some errors in my work and that I haven't found them yet. I mean sometimes you start working from the left and when you then go from the right to that point, it 'should add up', but in my work it sometimes doesnt. So I'm sure it would be best if you just neglect my work and only look at it when you're done, so you dont make the same errors.

    What I mean with angles: I initially thought that if I'd rotate the pictures to get the same perspective, that also the angles of the hairs would match. I mean in 1 pic for example all hair points down, so I figured that if I'd rotate another pic of pretty much the same area, that the hairs would also point down. But this is not the case for some pics. I think this is because of the differences in angle that you had between your camera and your hair. Anyway it complicates comparing the pics because either the perspective changes (two hairs that were vertically aligned are not vertically aligned anymore) or the direction of the hair changes, which makes comparison much harder.

    Only some pics have this problem though.

    Leave a comment:


  • AlmostUndone
    replied
    Originally posted by Arashi
    Hey how are you doing AlmostUndone. Your link doesn't work. I've linked most of the pictures in my previous work already, although some were harder to link because of the angles, maybe you're talking about that ? Anyway about the pictures that I did link: I'm 100% confident they're linked correctly. It's quite easy to verify: the further away from the temples, the more the pre and post situations resemble and thus the easier it becomes to verify. But I guess you've already seen that and are now trying to link some of the pics that I didnt link ?

    Good luck and let me know if I can help out with idea's !
    What are you talking about angles, angles? I used those same wound pictures, and the angles seem to match very well with the after-pictures. Just look:
    Link

    I'm not quite done yet (still working on the purple guidelines/flocculation). Everything was done from scratch.

    Leave a comment:


  • Arashi
    replied
    Originally posted by AlmostUndone
    Here's what I'm currently doing. Having pizza and connecting:

    Link


    Angle differences getting smaller. Maybe there's some way to make counting still easier. I have to think what I'm gonna do next. Ideas?
    Hey how are you doing AlmostUndone. Your link doesn't work. I've linked most of the pictures in my previous work already, although some were harder to link because of the angles, maybe you're talking about that ? Anyway about the pictures that I did link: I'm 100% confident they're linked correctly. It's quite easy to verify: the further away from the temples, the more the pre and post situations resemble and thus the easier it becomes to verify. But I guess you've already seen that and are now trying to link some of the pics that I didnt link ?

    Good luck and let me know if I can help out with idea's !

    Leave a comment:

Working...