Here's what I'm currently doing. Having pizza and connecting:
Link
Angle differences getting smaller. Maybe there's some way to make counting still easier. I have to think what I'm gonna do next. Ideas?
EDIT: Ah sorry forgot to include one pair of pics for the middle section.
HASCI - -How well does it work? Now we'll be able to find out!
Collapse
X
-
Ah, screw it! I seem to have found a way to link most the stuff together. I think there might be an update this month...Leave a comment:
-
I've been always busy. Maybe Spencer should do a coverage. Years ago he wanted to get information on whether it works or not. I promise I will do my utmost to take my own analysis to the goal, if Spencer would be interested (maybe ask the clinic for an interview? or just get the truth out?).
Unless Spencer is interested, I don't wanna use too much time on this.Leave a comment:
-
Well, Arashi, it seems that you are right about HST being a scam after all. You truly are a hero at this forum for your efforts.
It would be nice with some real 100 % proof though. I always give people the benefit of a doubt until proven guilty.
What are you people thinking now regarding a class action lawsuit against HASCI?Leave a comment:
-
WHY do you need to find a wound pic with the same angle as in the "before" pictures. Wouldn't it be possible as well to seek "before" pictures with the same angle as in available wound pics. (I have a lot of before pictures which you've never seen. Let me have a look...)
In the meanwhile, here are a few (maybe new, maybe not) wound pics from that location:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/...addendum2_.jpg
Well recipient analysis is really quite difficult it turns out. I mean I know the upper part is correct, I know the right part is correct but more inwards man it's just really hard to pinpoint each graft and know with certainty that it's a transplanted graft: the combo of dying hair in that area with newly transplanted hair makes it really difficult to determine everything with great confidence.
At this point I'm getting really bored with it and honestly am about to give up.
Besides, man, we've seen the donor loss, we've seen 1200 grafts were lost for 800 grafts, we've seen in previous cases that 1.5 hair/graft seems to be the hasci average, so this whole recipient analysis is quite useless to begin with. It would have been nice if we also could have analysed the recipient and know exactly how many hairs grew, because I think it would show a net hair *loss* because of grafts that failed to grow, but unfortunately it's really hard to do that.
If anyone believes hair multiplication took place when 1200 hairs are now gone from the donor, then I think they'd need to have their head checked.Leave a comment:
-
WHY do you need to find a wound pic with the same angle as in the "before" pictures. Wouldn't it be possible as well to seek "before" pictures with the same angle as in available wound pics. (I have a lot of before pictures which you've never seen. Let me have a look...)
In the meanwhile, here are a few (maybe new, maybe not) wound pics from that location:
Leave a comment:
-
Ok, a little progress update: I've succeeded in mapping & linking a huge part of the wound picture. Take a look at:
(please ignore the numbering in most of it, it's still not correct, need to fix it up)
You can easily see that the right part, right of the recipient area is linked and mapped correctly. It's easy to see since no grafts got transplanted and no hairs died in that area, so the before, after and wound pics show pretty much the same hairs.
Same goes for the part above the recipient area. So working from the right inwards and from the top downwards it's of course getting more and more difficult, since in that area new grafts were transplanted (which didnt always grow) and this is also the area where the most hairs died, so in short, linking becomes much more difficult here, the more you go inwards/downwards the more difficult it becomes.
It would be really helpful if we could do the same for the part left of the recipient area. Unfortunately I haven't seen any really good and useful wounds photo's from this part. You did supply two that are interesting but unfortunately they were taken from another angle. Easiest would be where the hair is angled like in this photo:
So we could then easily map the wounds picture onto that and start also working from the left inwards to the transplanted area.
Anyway here is all I have so far:
after pics:
before pics:
wound pics:
I'm not 100% sure of everything closest to the hairline. That's why I think it would be really helpful to find a way to link a wound picture with clear view of the left area to the before/after but I'm still not sure if we can even do that using the current photo's....
Anyway I'm afraid my work will be going on ultra low speed next weeks, don't have much time and I'm getting a bit demotivated now, really sucks we miss that good wound shot of the left part of your left temple.
*EDIT* BTW, I did try these photo's of that area, which can be linked via point A and B (which I've marked in the pics, see also the same letters in that wounds4 pic) but unfortunately the hair in those pics is shot at a very different angle and it's hard to make sense out of the hairs:
Anyway I'm also getting a bit tired and bored with this all. Maybe you can have a go at it and correct/build upon this foundation ?Leave a comment:
-
Not necessarily many useful ones, except for a smaller set I found in a different folder. Same thing with the right side. Good luck!
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/...5_addendum.jpgLeave a comment:
-
Not necessarily many useful ones, except for a smaller set I found in a different folder. Same thing with the right side. Good luck!
Leave a comment:
-
Wtf, how was that done? Very nice.Here are more wound pictures:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/...s_right_95.jpgLeave a comment:
-
Wtf, how was that done? Very nice.Here are more wound pictures:
Ps. There is a semi-permanent red spot in the upper-right corner of the upper-right image. Maybe you can use it to link the wound pics to the before pics?
The linking to before and after has become pretty trivial now: http://www.hasci-exposed.com/wounds%20-%20EDITnew.bmp check out the lines to the rightThe blue encircled area to the right that you've found indeed marked the end of the area where grafts to transplanted.
However I did make some errors in the numbering, going to go over all it tomorrow again, but as you can easily see in the lines (especially inside the blue area), it all is linked correctly now, before to after to wounds
Still, it's quite a bit of work but now that everything is linked together, the rest should be easier. It's still not trivial though, the fact that not all grafts survived does make it a bit harder, it's still a bit of a puzzle that way, but at least it's so much easier now than when we just had before and after pics.Leave a comment:
-
Wtf, how was that done? Very nice.Here are more wound pictures:
Ps. There is a semi-permanent red spot in the upper-right corner of the upper-right image. Maybe you can use it to link the wound pics to the before pics?Leave a comment:
-
Here is how the wounds link into to the after picture:
* Yellow circles: grafts I've found via the wounds picture
* White circles: grafts I had located already via the previous method
* Red circles: grafts that didnt make it
* Green circles: grafts that were not transplanted but simply were there already.
Man, I'm quite excited, this speeds up the process big time AND makes it so much betterI must admit, the idea of giving up was going through my mind, if you just compare after to before pictures, you'll never know 100% sure if a graft was new or not, IF there was a graft in the before picture that died and HASCI put a new one in roughly the same spot. But now with the wounds pictures we can pinpoint them all and we simply know for sure
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: