Nigams doubling test FAILED + proof.

[hellouser]

Not to mention, it would be really interesting to see what ACell + histogen applied to the donor would do. Dr. Ziering talked about that possibility about a year back..

Would be nice if the doctors would shut the f**k up about 'talking about' and actually EXECUTED instead.

[Arashi]

pay attention to ears, first guys dont show much ears even though ha has not much hairs on sides, second guy shows much more and he has much thicker sides.

Ears Shape is different too, not to mention hair texture, structure

EVERYTHING is different Didi. Look at the lines in his face too. Curlyness of the hair. Shape of the eyes. Shape of the ears. LOL. What a joke.

[didi]

pay attention to ears, first guys dont show much ears even though ha has not much hairs on sides, second guy shows much more and he has much thicker sides.

Ears Shape is different too, not to mention hair texture, structure

[Arashi]

Just when you thought dr Nigams couldn't fall any further, he just keeps on digging

[Arashi]

Hahaha. Those ears, shape of his eyes, lines in his face, curlyness of his hair. Yeah man that's the same guy allright

[didi]

uploading pictures

[Arashi]

BTW, that reminds me, some time ago that ex manager (Anjali, she's also in some of those photo's in that directory) attacked him in the newspaper claiming that 'dr' Nigams wasn't even a real doctor. Nigams said he was going to post proof. Did he ever do that ? I can't remember having seen it. Wait, I'll just ask him that myself, lol.

[Arashi]

Dr Nigam just posted new pictures on HS, again he used lame excuses and he failed again

Hehe yeah I just saw it. What's the use in arguing with this clown. Soon Dr Mwamba will expose him and nobody will ever care about Dr Nigams ever again.

[didi]

Actually, looking more at the photo's, I think it's really the best case scenario to say 4 hairs grew. I have doubts actually regarding most of them. It's difficult to tell. But 4 hairs is really the maximum. And several hairs disappeared in donor. So if anything, maybe the patient even lost hairs as a result.

Dr Nigam just posted new pictures on HS, again he used lame excuses and he failed again

[Arashi]

Actually, looking more at the photo's, I think it's really the best case scenario to say 4 hairs grew. I have doubts actually regarding most of them. It's difficult to tell. But 4 hairs is really the maximum. And several hairs disappeared in donor. So if anything, maybe the patient even lost hairs as a result.

[Arashi]

You also must love how he chose that 'day1' shot in that comparison photo. It so much more difficult to interpret, unlike that slit picture I just showed. It's how he always seems to work. Pretends like he doesn't have good photo's (also look at Tom's directory, really some stunningly good pictures there). That he doesn't know how to shoot them. But he does know and he does have them. He just doesn't want you to see them.

[Arashi]

As expected ... Dr Nigams has waken up and pictures are now quickly disappearing, lol. But of course I have backups. Here's at least the 15 graft test Nigam's doesn't want you to see:

preop:

http://oi40.tinypic.com/2je1soo.jpg

http://oi41.tinypic.com/34rzm79.jpg

(especially the last one is great for reference, it are just the slits)

postop, as of yesterday:

http://oi41.tinypic.com/2vanul3.jpg

(ignore the circles he drew, they don't match)

As you see, maybe 3-4 hairs grew ( I think 12, 14 and 6, maybe 1, have grown, The rest didn't). In donor most grew back, apart from a few hairs. So he just moved a few hairs to recipient. No regeneration going on.

*EDIT* it seems the pictures are actually still there.

[Dan26]

why acell and not a concoction of GF's?

[534623]

And as far as splitting grafts goes .. We saw that HASCI failed.

Sorry, but just because you're unable to read and to understand - it doesn't mean "HASCI failed".

Oh, just in case you still don't understand:

http://www.hasci.com/uploads/files/November_2010_journal_of_dermatological_treatment.pdf

So what part of table 1, page 4 (including detailed explanations of table 1), you still don't understand?

You come here and try to tell others in a sensational way the story that you "debunked HASCI" and that "they mostly need more drills to get the suitable grafts for implantation" - in fact, those grafts, a patient finally pays.

Wow - great news! ...but your "sensational news" are as old as scientifically published by Dr. Gho himself in 2010 (up to 31% "failed extractions" etc - at least in this study).

[crafter]

i don't think thart image looks photoshoped - you can see the indents in the skin where the hair grows from, just looks like a bad ht.