Dr Nigam agrees to doubling slick NW6/NW7

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • crafter
    replied
    Originally posted by gc83uk
    And of course I understand I was just trolling you because you've got a chip on your shoulder it seems.

    At the end of the day Nigam made some huge mistakes about a year ago and reduced his credibility to sub-zero.

    Most Nigam patients seem to go missing.

    Nigam still hasn't proven anything as of yet.

    Mwamba still doesn't know if anything works.

    That's where we currently are.

    You think we should just wait for Mwamba to do his tests and I think we should also run a 50 graft test with Nigam.

    what a depressing read, but you're probably right.

    Leave a comment:


  • gc83uk
    replied
    And of course I understand I was just trolling you because you've got a chip on your shoulder it seems.

    At the end of the day Nigam made some huge mistakes about a year ago and reduced his credibility to sub-zero.

    Most Nigam patients seem to go missing.

    Nigam still hasn't proven anything as of yet.

    Mwamba still doesn't know if anything works.

    That's where we currently are.

    You think we should just wait for Mwamba to do his tests and I think we should also run a 50 graft test with Nigam.

    Leave a comment:


  • UK_
    replied
    Originally posted by gc83uk
    You can't reproduce anything without first producing it.
    You're being deliberately obtuse b/c you're unable to respond to my comment re the reproduction of the method in a different environment.

    It wasnt me who said that btw, it was Dr Mwamba.

    Buh bye.

    Leave a comment:


  • gc83uk
    replied
    Originally posted by UK_
    You've clearly a flawed understanding of the scientific method, it's quite simple: for a procedure to be concluded effective scientifically it must be reproduced in a different environment by a different surgeon. That's how you reach the "proved successful" point, not by conducting an experiment yourself in your own lab and telling the world "look I've done it".
    You can't reproduce anything without first producing it.

    Leave a comment:


  • UK_
    replied
    Originally posted by gc83uk
    Frankly I don't think you know what you're talking about.

    It can only be achieved and replicated by other surgeons after it has been proved successful by at least one surgeon.
    You've clearly a flawed understanding of the scientific method, it's quite simple: for a procedure to be concluded effective scientifically it must be reproduced in a different environment by a different surgeon. That's how you reach the "proved successful" point, not by conducting an experiment yourself in your own lab and telling the world "look I've done it".

    Leave a comment:


  • gc83uk
    replied
    Originally posted by UK_
    That's the science, that's what I want. Pictures on a HD camera posted to a forum of a member who was paid for by another member who was given a free pizza for his troubles isnt scientific at all, and I dont expect it to be... because nobody on here is a scientist, we have web designers, accountants and stock brokers... but no scientists.
    This isn't just about you though, so I guess we'll just carry on without you.

    Leave a comment:


  • gc83uk
    replied
    Originally posted by UK_
    You just dont understand how the scientific method works, the prime issue here is gaining a scientific understanding of the process, and a scientifically sound conclusion that the process is working, that can only be achieved when the process is replicated in a different environment by a different surgeon.

    That's the science, that's what I want.
    Frankly I don't think you know what you're talking about.

    It can only be achieved and replicated by other surgeons after it has been proved successful by at least one surgeon.

    Leave a comment:


  • UK_
    replied
    Originally posted by gc83uk
    I didn't give a flying **** that Mwamba got involved. When I see some results then I might change my opinion. How's that for you?
    You just dont understand how the scientific method works, the prime issue here is gaining a scientific understanding of the process, and a scientifically sound conclusion that the process is working, that can only be achieved when the process is replicated in a different environment by a different [qualified] surgeon.

    That's the science, that's what I want. Pictures on a HD camera posted to a forum of a member who was paid for by another member who was given a free pizza for his troubles isnt scientific at all, and I dont expect it to be... because nobody on here is a scientist, we have web designers, accountants and stock brokers... but no scientists.

    Hope that clears everything up.

    Leave a comment:


  • gc83uk
    replied
    Originally posted by UK_
    Also, what is your donor like since HST? Has it thinned out? What NW are you now post-op?
    What do you care, you're just here to bash, right?

    Leave a comment:


  • gc83uk
    replied
    Originally posted by UK_
    But that's not the point though is it? Look how many patients Dr Gho butcherd in the 90's - didnt stop you though did it?

    I mean really, are you telling me you werent pleased to see Mwamba involved in Dr Nigams work? Because I know exactly what you were thinking 6 months ago... "ah this doctor from India is just scamming us all".... I can see from reading posts on here that opinion has significantly shifted since Mwamba has got involved.
    I didn't give a flying **** that Mwamba got involved. When I see some results then I might change my opinion. How's that for you?

    Leave a comment:


  • UK_
    replied
    Originally posted by gc83uk
    The same IAHRS doctors that still have FUT as the gold standard, yeah OK then!

    The same IAHRS doctors that advised me to go for a scalp reduction. lol
    But that's not the point though is it?

    I mean really, are you telling me you werent pleased to see Mwamba involved in Dr Nigams work? Because I know exactly what you were thinking 6 months ago... "ah this doctor from India is just scamming us all".... I can see from reading posts on here that that opinion has significantly shifted since Mwamba has got involved.

    Also, what is your donor like since HST? Has it thinned out? What NW are you now post-op?

    Leave a comment:


  • gc83uk
    replied
    Originally posted by UK_
    Errr, I think it's going to be a big thing when the IAHRS accept doubling as a mainstream workable procedure in the industry... obviously you've just recently got into the politics of the hair transplant industry.
    The same IAHRS doctors that still have FUT as the gold standard, yeah OK then!

    The same IAHRS doctors that advised me to go for a scalp reduction. lol

    Leave a comment:


  • UK_
    replied
    Originally posted by JJJJrS
    What difference does it make if it's approved by the IAHRS? There's plenty of IAHRS members I wouldn't let touch my scalp. There's enough resources online now that you should be able to make your own educated decisions
    Errr, I think it's going to be a big thing when the IAHRS accept doubling as a mainstream workable procedure in the industry... obviously you've just recently got into the politics of the hair transplant industry.

    Leave a comment:


  • JJJJrS
    replied
    Originally posted by UK_
    You had a HST which was not approved by the IAHRS... how did that work out for you?
    What difference does it make if it's approved by the IAHRS? There's plenty of IAHRS members I wouldn't let touch my scalp. There's enough resources online now that you should be able to make your own educated decisions

    Leave a comment:


  • crafter
    replied
    whats the latest? does it work? is Dr Mwamba going to use it?

    Leave a comment:

Working...