Dr Nigam agrees to doubling slick NW6/NW7

[gc83uk]

and what is your point... ? you dont want test ?

Of course I want the test. I want as many tests as possible.

I just don't understand why you don't want us to also have Nigam do a test.

[JDW]

The area shaved would be relatively small, maybe say 4cm by 2cm. How do you have your hair?

The grafts could be put in the hairline, but they would have to be visible. Are you receeding at the front? What NW are you?

yes reeceding at the front, probably somewhere between a 2 and 3 but hair is grown out to cover it a bit.

[gc83uk]

its not essential indeed

wrong, between 80 and 100% according to mwamba and he is one of the best in the world..

Interesting! I was suggesting last week that 85% for top FUE surgeons is not unusual, but a few others here in this forum were either not sure or adamant that it was 100% which I thought was incorrect. I'm glad you have clarified this.

[gc83uk]

But for now, from what we have counted it seems i have exact same density from my before to my after surgery in the 4 area strips counted per cm²...

Can you tell me, did you count the number of hairs or the FU's?

[tom vercetti]

This would help, but it really isn't essential.

True, recipient is probably not going to be 100%, but at least 95%

its not essential indeed

wrong, between 80 and 100% according to mwamba and he is one of the best in the world..

[tom vercetti]

Well Dr Nigam already say YES, so why are we bothering doing tests with Dr Mwamba in that case?

and what is your point... ? you dont want test ?

[gc83uk]

we would maybe need a tatoo at recipient (a very small point..) but taking into account usually recipient is not a 100% full regrowth even if mwamba is very good for that.

This would help, but it really isn't essential.

True, recipient is probably not going to be 100%, but at least 95%

[gc83uk]

there is no way one say yes and the other say no. We will test on many patient, different method on same patient also. We want to count and see what give the best regrowth at donor and recipient.

If it doesnt work, then it doesnt work, i want a scientific approach there. But for now, from what we have counted it seems i have exact same density from my before to my after surgery in the 4 area strips counted per cm²...

Well Dr Nigam already say YES, so why are we bothering doing tests with Dr Mwamba in that case?

[tom vercetti]

The area shaved would be relatively small, maybe say 4cm by 2cm. How do you have your hair?

The grafts could be put in the hairline, but they would have to be visible. Are you receeding at the front? What NW are you?

we would maybe need a tatoo at recipient (a very small point..) but taking into account usually recipient is not a 100% full regrowth even if mwamba is very good for that.

[tom vercetti]

There is no harm running dual tests.

Let me ask you a question, if Mwamba says he thinks it doesn't work, then what will you do?

Whilst at the same time Nigam is saying YES it works. Will you go back to Nigam or will you listen to Mwamba?

there is no way one say yes and the other say no. We will test on many patient, different method on same patient also. We want to count and see what give the best regrowth at donor and recipient.

If it doesnt work, then it doesnt work, i want a scientific approach there. But for now, from what we have counted it seems i have exact same density from my before to my after surgery in the 4 area strips counted per cm²...

[gc83uk]

If shaving the donor wasn't compulsory and the donor area could still be evaluated I'd possibly be up for it...I take pro photos / videos so have the ideal lenses.
Trying to think if the person could have the grafts put in just in front of the hairline so they could be monitored that way?

The area shaved would be relatively small, maybe say 4cm by 2cm. How do you have your hair?

The grafts could be put in the hairline, but they would have to be visible. Are you receeding at the front? What NW are you?

[gc83uk]

maybe before february.. i just prefer see it large.. I just hope people will not start to disturb again because of me mwamba at phone for that


yes you can send someone from the forum if he is rich and dont care about airplane for exemple. But i dont see the point as we will start an official test soon with mwamba.. here in europe..

There is no harm running dual tests.

Let me ask you a question, if Mwamba says he thinks it doesn't work, then what will you do?

Whilst at the same time Nigam is saying YES it works. Will you go back to Nigam or will you listen to Mwamba? Come February this might be the reality and then we have lost another 6 months because we didn't organise our own test with Nigam. We should have done it 6 months ago!

[JDW]

If shaving the donor wasn't compulsory and the donor area could still be evaluated I'd possibly be up for it...I take pro photos / videos so have the ideal lenses.
Trying to think if the person could have the grafts put in just in front of the hairline so they could be monitored that way?

[gc83uk]

That's exactly what I was asking, thanks. Would the donor need to be shaved in the person and what if they were on meds?

Also what happened to working with Thane or the others that were going to be documented?

I doubt being on meds would make any difference, I suppose as long as the patient didn't alter their current regime then it would be fine.

The patient would need to be able to shave the 50 graft area in their donor for the procedure and again during the following weeks and months to monitor regrowth.

As for the recipient, this area would also need to be visible, those implanted 100 bisected grafts would need to be counted and analysed from implantation, around the 3 month mark, 6 month mark and maybe 9 month mark. By then it should be clear.

From what I can gather, this Thane bloke didn't like the idea of having a hair transplant, it didn't interest him. I'm surprised a financial incentive wasn't offered.

However there is another patient called Joshi, who is just as bald as Thane, so hopefully we'll have a new case to monitor in the next couple of weeks.

[tom vercetti]

Tom glad to hear about the photos.

But why wait until February for Mwamba to finish his testing when we can also send someone from the forums to Dr Nigam?

As a side note, it would actually be interesting to compare the results between Mwamba and Nigam.

maybe before february.. i just prefer see it large.. I just hope people will not start to disturb again because of me mwamba at phone for that


yes you can send someone from the forum if he is rich and dont care about airplane for exemple. But i dont see the point as we will start an official test soon with mwamba.. here in europe..