All Hope is Not Lost, After All

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • PatientlyWaiting
    replied
    Originally posted by Fixed by 35
    If I ever grow my hair back, I will be on one enormous high. That's well worth £50,000 in itself.

    But besides that, I still firmly believe it will help my business and give me new confidence, which will see a return on the initial £50,000 outlay.
    Haha hey speak for yourself, 50k is a lot of money man. I can't afford that but if I had it, i'd definitely trade it in for a full head of permanent hair.

    This HSC stuff seems very promising though. I wonder how far along are they right now.

    Leave a comment:


  • Fixed by 35
    replied
    If I ever grow my hair back, I will be on one enormous high. That's well worth £50,000 in itself.

    But besides that, I still firmly believe it will help my business and give me new confidence, which will see a return on the initial £50,000 outlay.

    Leave a comment:


  • CVAZBAR
    replied
    Originally posted by Phatalis
    Oh, me personally? Dude I don't care if it's 50,000. If it works and it stays on the top of my head for years I'm doing it. I don't need a new car or boat or any of that shit people buy. I
    ll be getting out of school in a couple of years and when I make money... hair and a house is really all I give a shit about. Actually... just an apartment.

    Everything else comes next.
    HAHAHAHA! Thanks dawg. I dont mean it in a bad way but what you wrote made me crack up. " Hair and as house is really all i give a shit about" haha. I truly feel the same way and i understand how it is dealing with this bullshit. That was hilarious. It's funny how growing up i never noticed any bald guys and still dont think bad about any but when It's happening to you, its like the end of the world. Hopefully this shit is not fake and we can end this anxiety.

    Leave a comment:


  • Fixed by 35
    replied
    There is not a single shred of evidence showing baldness = seniority. There is plenty to show baldness = ridicule.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dutch_Dude
    replied
    anyways, let's hope that histogen will be available in asia by 2013-2014...if it's the real deal, i don't mind flying over there...nice trip!

    Leave a comment:


  • chasguy
    replied
    Originally posted by mascott23
    I would prolly have to say that it's a genetic defect. people with androgenetic alopecia (AGA) have shown to have increased risk of cardiovascular disease due to increased levels of aldosterone and an increased risk of insulin resistance. I'm not saying that AGA causes the increased risk of cardiovascular disease or vice versa. but there have been many studies correlating the two. based on this information I think that due to the greater susceptibility of developing cardiovascular problems AGA is a genetic defect that evolution wasn't able to filter out due to great strides in medical advances that allowed individuals with AGA to reproduce.
    By the time you develop cardiovascular disease you've already reproduced. Effective genes get you to puberty and get you reproduced.. .they don't "care" what happens to you afterward except for where a long life my help ensure your offspring survive. There is good evidence that balding is a social cue that a particular male is engaging in less risky behavior and more socially mature as well as communicating a senior rank in the social order. This includes apes as well as humans. Remember though, we are simply a vehicle for our genes to reproduce. If your genes get passed on, then they are effective. If AGA was shown to 100% cause terminal brain cancer at 50 years old, that would have had zero effect on evolution. Pre-modern times you'd still have been reproducing at 15 years old and the kids would have been out of the "house" by 30

    Leave a comment:


  • mascott23
    replied
    I would prolly have to say that it's a genetic defect. people with androgenetic alopecia (AGA) have shown to have increased risk of cardiovascular disease due to increased levels of aldosterone and an increased risk of insulin resistance. I'm not saying that AGA causes the increased risk of cardiovascular disease or vice versa. but there have been many studies correlating the two. based on this information I think that due to the greater susceptibility of developing cardiovascular problems AGA is a genetic defect that evolution wasn't able to filter out due to great strides in medical advances that allowed individuals with AGA to reproduce.

    Leave a comment:


  • Fixed by 35
    replied
    I just don't think it's a good theory, even for cavemen. It makes no sense and every shred of evidence we have is that baldness has been seen throughout human history as a bad thing. The suggestion that it marked out social status has no grounding, it's a loose theory at best.

    It could just as easily have been a beacon to show a bald man had passed the point of sexual maturity and was therefore no longer eligible. It could have been a sign of age in order for the tribe to disown them because they were now too old to do their fair share of hunting and would be a burden.

    Balding could also be a far more recent genetic defect for all we know, that developed far more recently. Like things like skin tags and bags under the eyes, it could just be a mistake of nature that evolution can't irradicate.

    All these theories are just as plausible.

    Leave a comment:


  • chasguy
    replied
    Originally posted by Fixed by 35
    I disagree, there is no evidence for such a theory. Hair loss throughout history has been ridiculed, there is no evidence whatsoever of a bald hierarchy.
    In great apes there is, and I was referring to stone tools and cave days... Written history is all recent. Evolutionary development of MPH is a well discussed theory

    Leave a comment:


  • Fixed by 35
    replied
    I disagree, there is no evidence for such a theory. Hair loss throughout history has been ridiculed, there is no evidence whatsoever of a bald hierarchy.

    Leave a comment:


  • chasguy
    replied
    Originally posted by Fixed by 35
    Androgenetic alopecia is probably best described as a genetic defect, not a disease. All of us here have an idiot gene that tells our hair to stop growing despite the fact that we need it, for example as protection from the sun.

    For the same reason, like any genetic defect, it is very hard to treat. You can fight the symptoms, but not the cause. That is why a cure has been difficult to find and why Histogen could be the one.
    Its not a defect... in our monkey brothers it is a mark of social status. Likely it is the same in humans, however now our cultures push us to maintain youthful appearance at all costs. This is why women die their hair, shave everything else, struggle to remain then and fight off wrinkles.

    Leave a comment:


  • ohlife
    replied
    Wait.. how would this work? If it regrows new follicles, then do they grow back sporadically or in the same pattern as the original hair pattern? or do they simply resuscitate the old, dead ones? If the former is true, then how does this treatment propose to treat, ostensibly the greatest concern to hair loss sufferers, the hairline/temple region? If it merely restores say 25% of hair thickness around the area of injection, but the injection for practical purposes can only be done on the midscalp/crown regions, then how significant can this treatment possibly be?

    Leave a comment:


  • KeepTheHair
    replied
    Uhm, what?

    Leave a comment:


  • crashul
    replied
    some more hope

    Leave a comment:


  • Vanzzzz
    replied
    I have emailed histogen volunteering to be one of their trial subjects lol. Basically they told me the estimated introduction of their product will be 2013 in Asia,including where I live, and hopefully 2015 in US.

    I really, really, really hope their product comes through. I am very eager to keep the hair I have...

    Leave a comment:

Working...