Haha hey speak for yourself, 50k is a lot of money man. I can't afford that but if I had it, i'd definitely trade it in for a full head of permanent hair.
This HSC stuff seems very promising though. I wonder how far along are they right now.
All Hope is Not Lost, After All
Collapse
X
-
If I ever grow my hair back, I will be on one enormous high. That's well worth £50,000 in itself.
But besides that, I still firmly believe it will help my business and give me new confidence, which will see a return on the initial £50,000 outlay.Leave a comment:
-
Oh, me personally? Dude I don't care if it's 50,000. If it works and it stays on the top of my head for years I'm doing it. I don't need a new car or boat or any of that shit people buy. I
ll be getting out of school in a couple of years and when I make money... hair and a house is really all I give a shit about. Actually... just an apartment.
Everything else comes next.Leave a comment:
-
There is not a single shred of evidence showing baldness = seniority. There is plenty to show baldness = ridicule.Leave a comment:
-
anyways, let's hope that histogen will be available in asia by 2013-2014...if it's the real deal, i don't mind flying over there...nice trip!Leave a comment:
-
I would prolly have to say that it's a genetic defect. people with androgenetic alopecia (AGA) have shown to have increased risk of cardiovascular disease due to increased levels of aldosterone and an increased risk of insulin resistance. I'm not saying that AGA causes the increased risk of cardiovascular disease or vice versa. but there have been many studies correlating the two. based on this information I think that due to the greater susceptibility of developing cardiovascular problems AGA is a genetic defect that evolution wasn't able to filter out due to great strides in medical advances that allowed individuals with AGA to reproduce.Leave a comment:
-
I would prolly have to say that it's a genetic defect. people with androgenetic alopecia (AGA) have shown to have increased risk of cardiovascular disease due to increased levels of aldosterone and an increased risk of insulin resistance. I'm not saying that AGA causes the increased risk of cardiovascular disease or vice versa. but there have been many studies correlating the two. based on this information I think that due to the greater susceptibility of developing cardiovascular problems AGA is a genetic defect that evolution wasn't able to filter out due to great strides in medical advances that allowed individuals with AGA to reproduce.Leave a comment:
-
I just don't think it's a good theory, even for cavemen. It makes no sense and every shred of evidence we have is that baldness has been seen throughout human history as a bad thing. The suggestion that it marked out social status has no grounding, it's a loose theory at best.
It could just as easily have been a beacon to show a bald man had passed the point of sexual maturity and was therefore no longer eligible. It could have been a sign of age in order for the tribe to disown them because they were now too old to do their fair share of hunting and would be a burden.
Balding could also be a far more recent genetic defect for all we know, that developed far more recently. Like things like skin tags and bags under the eyes, it could just be a mistake of nature that evolution can't irradicate.
All these theories are just as plausible.Leave a comment:
-
In great apes there is, and I was referring to stone tools and cave days... Written history is all recent. Evolutionary development of MPH is a well discussed theoryLeave a comment:
-
I disagree, there is no evidence for such a theory. Hair loss throughout history has been ridiculed, there is no evidence whatsoever of a bald hierarchy.Leave a comment:
-
Androgenetic alopecia is probably best described as a genetic defect, not a disease. All of us here have an idiot gene that tells our hair to stop growing despite the fact that we need it, for example as protection from the sun.
For the same reason, like any genetic defect, it is very hard to treat. You can fight the symptoms, but not the cause. That is why a cure has been difficult to find and why Histogen could be the one.Leave a comment:
-
Wait.. how would this work? If it regrows new follicles, then do they grow back sporadically or in the same pattern as the original hair pattern? or do they simply resuscitate the old, dead ones? If the former is true, then how does this treatment propose to treat, ostensibly the greatest concern to hair loss sufferers, the hairline/temple region? If it merely restores say 25% of hair thickness around the area of injection, but the injection for practical purposes can only be done on the midscalp/crown regions, then how significant can this treatment possibly be?Leave a comment:
-
Leave a comment:
-
I have emailed histogen volunteering to be one of their trial subjects lol. Basically they told me the estimated introduction of their product will be 2013 in Asia,including where I live, and hopefully 2015 in US.
I really, really, really hope their product comes through. I am very eager to keep the hair I have...Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: