Concerning Histogen - they documented zero, zilch, nada!
they're idiots, true, but the concept of using growth factors to regrow hair should work. Rogaine works mainly by upregulating VEGF. Histogen does that and more so it should regrow at least as much as rogaine...
they're idiots, true, but the concept of using growth factors to regrow hair should work. Rogaine works mainly by upregulating VEGF. Histogen does that and more so it should regrow at least as much as rogaine...
How many differerent GROWTH FACTORS...
...is this scientist using in his post?
"HSC is currently being developed and evaluated as an injectable for hair growth. The embryonic-like proteins and growth factors within the complex, including follistatin, VEGF and KGF, have been shown to both stimulate resting hair follicles to produce new hair, as well as induce stem cells in the scalp to form new follicles."
"HSC is currently being developed and evaluated as an injectable for hair growth. The embryonic-like proteins and growth factors within the complex, including follistatin, VEGF and KGF, have been shown to both stimulate resting hair follicles to produce new hair, as well as induce stem cells in the scalp to form new follicles."
How do you think rogaine works? Explain
2020 has come over to the light side of the force!!!
Concerning Histogen - they documented zero, zilch, nada!
I'm the one who documented their presented pics:
pffffft... they presented photos of just 2 trail subjects, whereby subject S2018 just shows a completely normal hairy and cycling area...
... and S1016 doesn't even show the same area!!
S2018: IF this stuff is working so "significantly" and is able to "reverse" balding or to keep hairs in ANAGEN (growth phase) ...
- why disappeared so many hairs at all?
- why there are suddenly so many thinner hairs in the after photo?
- can YOU see +35.88% more hairs?? I can clearly see rather the contrary...
In simple words, what they presented, is simply scientific misconduct. And everbody who supports such a behavior - is also a gangster. Because such a behavior just provides more room for other gangsters in this field; namely, the "nothing can happen to me" attitude.
To be blunt, I honestly don't give a crap about over analysing a particular treatment. Those pictures are 100% irrelevant. At the end of the day the product is estimated to come out in 2-3 years. Either it does or it doesn't.
The people working on it know far more about hair loss than anyone on these forums, and all we can do is wait for something to hopefully come out sooner rather than later. At the end of the day, nobody wants to be spending their mortgage on continual GHO treatments or the like.
Just found this over on Hairsite. Haven't been able to listen to it myself yet but from what I've read Gail talks about timelines - 2016 for US release and possibly a year before for other parts of the world. It's good to hear it cos it's from Gail herself and because it's a recent estimation so should be in keeping with their current progress. I honestly think I can hold on til 2015/16. If the release in Asia is only going to be a year before the Western world I might just wait for it to come here, it'd be a lot easier.
Comment