Histogen at the ISHRS conference

[534623]

Also, dr. ziering is a very well respected doctor who isn't going to ruin his reputation by lying to the hair loss community.

Sure, that's the reason why he mentioned recently in Spencers show "I didn't present at the ISHRS meeting...I'm not responsible for what has been said and presented at the meeting ..."

In simple words - he said he has nothing to do with all the bullcrap - he is "guiltless". What a shame.

[Breaking Bald]

What is your problem Ironman? Other than being a miserable, cynical 50 year old man I mean.

[Kirby_]

What is your problem Ironman? Other than being a miserable, cynical 50 year old man I mean.

Have you ever met any Austrians? They're all as mad as a box of frogs.

[garethbale]

Hard? Not at all. How many points do you need?
Are there other scientists who support Histogen's claims?

Err...how many scientists support Gho's claims?

[UK_]

Iron_Man has been eating too many frankfurters again.

[Kirby_]

Wiener würstchen, more accurately.

[Breaking Bald]

lolololol this is exactly how I picture Ironman in my head:

[Scientalk56]

Well maybe i don't agree with iron-man / 56968(numbers)
But i think he has the right to express his opinions too, since he's also a member who share the same concerns (baldness)...

Just a thought..

[Jasari]

Not sure why some people on a hairloss website no less, are opposed to a new treatment showing documented regrowth.

It's quite funny, it seems like some people have this football team mentality with hairloss, where they want to be right about a specific treatment being the right one to cure hairloss. It's ridiculous, I couldn't care less about who comes out with what as long as it works.

[Breaking Bald]

Well maybe i don't agree with iron-man / 56968(numbers)
But i think he has the right to express his opinions too, since he's also a member who share the same concerns (baldness)...

Just a thought..

Well...yeah of course he does. But does he have to express his views in a constantly sarcastic, rude, stubborn, insulting, unjustified and patronising way? No. He's an asshole.

[UK_]

Well maybe i don't agree with iron-man / 56968(numbers)
But i think he has the right to express his opinions too, since he's also a member who share the same concerns (baldness)...

Just a thought..

The guy is a known troll on practically every hair loss forum in existence.

[garethbale]

Well maybe i don't agree with iron-man / 56968(numbers)
But i think he has the right to express his opinions too, since he's also a member who share the same concerns (baldness)...

Just a thought..

I'm relatively new to this forum but it didn't take long to cross paths with him.

Say anything remotely questioning Gho and he tries to shoot you down for it, yet he trolls every other thread with hie garbage, offering no reasoned debate whatsoever. Of course anyone here has the right to express their opinions but he just speaks to people in a rude, patronising way. Half his comments make no sense or are not written in proper context to address a point...plus he needlessly writes certain words in capitals which comes across as very condescending. (The capital letters particularly annoy me for some reason )

The guy is a just a massive tw@t!

[534623]

Not sure why some people on a hairloss website no less,
are opposed to a new treatment showing documented regrowth.

Concerning Histogen - they documented zero, zilch, nada!
I'm the one who documented their presented pics:



pffffft... they presented photos of just 2 trail subjects, whereby subject S2018 just shows a completely normal hairy and cycling area...
... and S1016 doesn't even show the same area!!

S2018: IF this stuff is working so "significantly" and is able to "reverse" balding or to keep hairs in ANAGEN (growth phase) ...

- why disappeared so many hairs at all?
- why there are suddenly so many thinner hairs in the after photo?
- can YOU see +35.88% more hairs?? I can clearly see rather the contrary...

In simple words, what they presented, is simply scientific misconduct. And everbody who supports such a behavior - is also a gangster. Because such a behavior just provides more room for other gangsters in this field; namely, the "nothing can happen to me" attitude.

[Thinning87]

Well...yeah of course he does. But does he have to express his views in a constantly sarcastic, rude, stubborn, insulting, unjustified and patronising way? No. He's an asshole.

I quote every word.

[Kiwi]

lolololol this is exactly how i picture ironman in my head:

lmfao!!!!!!!!!!