New Stemcell Treatment Photos... wow?

[drnigams]

Smurf,
Till now we were using DP and DS isolated stemcells apart from epithelial cd200 ,cd34, k19,ORS stemcells as a part of our stemcell solution.We realised the below mentioned two mistakes just recently...
1)To wait for at least 1 1/2 month to two months to have sufficient dose of stemcells,and increase the number of injections to 4.
2)After i found out the specific markers for DP cells ,we realized we need sufficient quantity of inducible DP cells.
At present from the next week after speaking to german team i will discuss my new DP and DS cell culture and will start its trial with few samples in the lab and probably by next month should be able to add DP/DC cultured cells with Epithelial stem cells.This should improve results significantly.

Aderans solved this problem didn't they. They can maintain hair inducing ability for as many cycles as they want now right?

Dr. Nigam,

I meant to ask did you encounter problems maintaining the inducing ability at 3 months. Is this why you originally started at 18 days or is it just cheaper cost and an easier domestic sales pitch?

Thanks!

[Breaking Bald]

I literally have no idea what you are talking about...btw is that you narrating that video? If so, I am very sympathetic towards you because you don't sound right in the head. You also sound much older, mid 40's maybe? That rings alarm bells right there, a mid 40 year old who loves to argue with people all day long on the internet...nice.

[534623]

Yeah I thought 'massive bell end' was more fitting for someone like you No need to thank me.

So - what?

Someone like you can even see in such a pic a "massive twat" - or now you edited it to "massive bell end" ...

"massive twat" or "massive bell end" ?

I mean, the change of your train of thoughts from "twat" to "bell end" - what the hell is wrong with you ...

[Breaking Bald]

Yeah I thought 'massive bell end' was more fitting for someone like you No need to thank me.

[534623]

How about this sentence? 'Ironman is a massive bell end'. Makes perfect sense to me.

For someone like YOU - no doubts ...

Let me guess ...


Someone like you can even see in such a pic a "massive twat" - or now you edited it to "massive bell end" ...

[Breaking Bald]

How about this sentence? 'Ironman is a massive bell end'. Makes perfect sense to me.

[534623]

good answer, i'll take that as a yes then...

By the way ...

"Minoxidil can regrow lost hair although it is pretty ineffective."

Can you please explain me the logic behind such a sentence like this sentence?

How about the following sentence:

"IronMan is working for Dr. Gho, although he is not effectively working for Dr. Gho".

Yup, the logic behind this sentence is similar - I think.

[534623]

good answer, i'll take that as a yes then...

"yes" - what? I'm working for Gho? Who knows ...

[garethbale]

hmmm – interesting question …

http://www.baldtruthtalk.com/showpost.php?p=99563&postcount=122

YOU tell me …

Just because someone like me is fully aware about the work of an individual …

http://www.hasci.com/default2.aspx?id_menu_item=e62e845e-3cdd-4539-88cc-52726601fe25&special_type=0

… and reports about his work, that doesn’t necessarily mean, that this person “is working for this individual” – or do you also think, I work for Dr. Lauster …

http://www.baldtruthtalk.com/showthread.php?t=10995

… just because I report what he is doing? Why don’t guys like “Spex” or “Jotronic” (just for example) discuss and report about “cutting-edge research”?

As long as someone produces something REALISTIC and USEFUL – I wouldn’t even have a problem to “hype” (or at least to cite/quote) even losers like Dr. Rassman & XXX. To know and to understand whether or not something is “realistic and useful” – you must be smarter than around 800 researcher groups in this field out there, and, in addition, you must be fully aware not just about THEIR work specifically in the “hair research field”. It’s not so unusual, that sometimes complete outsiders have far more profound knowledge about a specific research field, than “just well-known insiders”. I prefer to be the complete outsider – makes more fun. I theory, YOU can formulate it like this: “I say what has the potential to work – and what doesn’t” – including a profound explanation about the reasons. But there is always a problem involved:
Who is the one who is able to judge about these so-called “profound explanations”? You? Nigam? There are actually just 2 individuals out there, I would allow them to judge: The first guy is me - and the other guy is definitely not Dr. Nigam. TODAY, not even guys like Dr. Gho. Like all this or not – I don’t care. I’m just the mentioned outsider.

good answer, i'll take that as a yes then...

[534623]

As long as someone produces something REALISTIC and USEFUL – I wouldn’t even have a problem to “hype” (or at least to cite/quote) even losers like Dr. Rassman & XXX. To know and to understand whether or not something is “realistic and useful” – you must be smarter than around 800 researcher groups in this field out there, and, in addition, you must be fully aware not just about THEIR work specifically in the “hair research field”. It’s not so unusual, that sometimes complete outsiders have far more profound knowledge about a specific research field, than “just well-known insiders”.

Here is another example ...

http://youtu.be/3njZkP_3N48

Guess who is the producer of such videos ... I produced this video. So you should rather ask - why?

The only one -so far- who has been really "useful" in this context (to get THE "visible" answers I'm looking for), has been Dr. Jerry Cooley. Today I know, what THIS kind/type of "ECM" is able to do and what this stuff is simply unable to do - context-specific.

[534623]

534

Do you work for, or are you affiliated with Dr Gho?

hmmm – interesting question …

http://www.baldtruthtalk.com/showpost.php?p=99563&postcount=122

YOU tell me …

Just because someone like me is fully aware about the work of an individual …

http://www.hasci.com/default2.aspx?id_menu_item=e62e845e-3cdd-4539-88cc-52726601fe25&special_type=0

… and reports about his work, that doesn’t necessarily mean, that this person “is working for this individual” – or do you also think, I work for Dr. Lauster …

http://www.baldtruthtalk.com/showthread.php?t=10995

… just because I report what he is doing? Why don’t guys like “Spex” or “Jotronic” (just for example) discuss and report about “cutting-edge research”?

As long as someone produces something REALISTIC and USEFUL – I wouldn’t even have a problem to “hype” (or at least to cite/quote) even losers like Dr. Rassman & XXX. To know and to understand whether or not something is “realistic and useful” – you must be smarter than around 800 researcher groups in this field out there, and, in addition, you must be fully aware not just about THEIR work specifically in the “hair research field”. It’s not so unusual, that sometimes complete outsiders have far more profound knowledge about a specific research field, than “just well-known insiders”. I prefer to be the complete outsider – makes more fun. I theory, YOU can formulate it like this: “I say what has the potential to work – and what doesn’t” – including a profound explanation about the reasons. But there is always a problem involved:
Who is the one who is able to judge about these so-called “profound explanations”? You? Nigam? There are actually just 2 individuals out there, I would allow them to judge: The first guy is me - and the other guy is definitely not Dr. Nigam. TODAY, not even guys like Dr. Gho. Like all this or not – I don’t care. I’m just the mentioned outsider.

[neversaynever]

534

Do you work for, or are you affiliated with Dr Gho?

Ignore it. You're feeding him.

[garethbale]

Trust me - Dr. Gho doesn't need "advices" from amateurs, who couldn't show themselves neither this nor that.

By the way - from where do you get these so-called "progenitor stem cells" and/or "DP cultured potent cells" for injection into bisected follicles? From the supermarket next to your clinic?

Dr. Gho doesn't need any injections into his PL-FUT (HST) grafts - these grafts proceduce hairs with the same characteristics as in the donor area (where the left behind follicle parts regenerate also) - even without any "progenitor stem cells" and/or "DP cultured potent cells" injections into them. The point is, that the "bisected grafts" should produce each and every missing part ON THEIR OWN.

534

Do you work for, or are you affiliated with Dr Gho?

[534623]

Only thing is that dr ghos technique improves if he injects progenitor stem cells into the donor and bisected follicles.
His technique will improve if he start injecting DP cultured potent cells into both the bisected FU.
And his technique will improve if he starts bisecting HF in vitro under high magnification.9not blindly in vivo)

Trust me - Dr. Gho doesn't need "advices" from amateurs, who couldn't show themselves neither this nor that.

By the way - from where do you get these so-called "progenitor stem cells" and/or "DP cultured potent cells" for injection into bisected follicles? From the supermarket next to your clinic?

Dr. Gho doesn't need any injections into his PL-FUT (HST) grafts - these grafts proceduce hairs with the same characteristics as in the donor area (where the left behind follicle parts regenerate also) - even without any "progenitor stem cells" and/or "DP cultured potent cells" injections into them. The point is, that the "bisected grafts" should produce each and every missing part ON THEIR OWN.

[Boldy]

Aderans solved this problem didn't they. They can maintain hair inducing ability for as many cycles as they want now right?


Thanks!

Indeed they seem to have made it more efficient.