Is HASCI for real?

[damielmillo]

Hey NeedHairASAP, donīt be bored with some users...if they donīt want to beleive is their problem...
We know and see that Gho is legit and we will have the procedure in 2012 so, be quiet...i think that we are winning more than some users that only want to have negative reviews...
I have date for May 2012...i hope they can extract more than 1700 grafts...
what do you think?

[NeedHairASAP]

I am seeing some fine hairs - which might get stronger - and from your pictures on hairsite, I am seeing FUEs taken from an extremely dense donor area in the first place.

therefore what? you see a dense donor area, therefore.......? therefore we should ignore the other photos of scars with hair growing out of them?



what is wrong with you people?

whats more plausible?:

Gho is splitting follicular units with 99% precision

or

Gho is leaving enough tissue behind to regenerate hairs





I've read Gho's explanation of the procedure and it sounds more plausible (and much easier to perform) than it would be to split Follicular Units with 99% precision



first it was, "there is no regrowth"

then we saw regrowth and it was, "he's just splitting hairs"

then, "what about recipient growth?"

then we saw that and now its, "we don't have enough evidence"

something tells me it may take awhile for this to get mainstream recognition...





Gho's procedure is scientifically plausible and works off the same science as all your beloved "cell technology" pixar-movie-making companies.... and on top of that he has a peer reviewed paper, recipient results posted on his site, and we have GC proving both donor regrowth (of some kind) and recipient regrowth (to some extent), yet....... Follica's pixar cartoon movies are more evidence than Gho has...

[NeedHairASAP]

So when are you getting it done bro?

is that really your only response you have, bro?

I guess I won that argument?

and to answer you're lame response in question form-- I have a consultation booked this June, bitch





I guess CVbazer is trying to make this argument:

"some people who think Gho's procedure works dont have money or time to get the procedure immediately, therefore the procedure doesn't work"

nice argument CV












@GC - dont even bother bickering with these people GC. Just keep posting photos. For every 1 loser who doesn't appreciate it, there are 12 that do.

[gc83uk]

I am seeing some fine hairs - which might get stronger - and from your pictures on hairsite, I am seeing FUEs taken from an extremely dense donor area in the first place.

It will be hard to establish whether the hairs have regenerated in the donor area, because there are no close ups.

Also, we can't really see how the fine 0.6mm holes are - or how they compare to 1mm holes for instance. It looks good, but so do good 1mm FUE sites.

To me, it looks like another carefully selected Gho patient, with no conclusive pictures.

Whether you are in on it or not is beside the point. The pictures can not prove donor regeneration.

I hope it works out for you.

Anyone else going to Gho - PLEASE INSIST ON BETTER PHOTOS.

So did you miss this close up picture http://www.fileden.com/files/2011/9/...onor%20010.jpg

What do you mean by insisting on better photos? Gho didn't take them. I've taken all of my own photos.

[CVAZBAR]

a. is Dean Saunders a "carefully selected gho patient"? the guys nw7

b. We have close ups of GCs head. In them we see hairs sprouting from red holes.... GC is a third party and his outcome matches the peer-reviewed outcomes Gho had.. both Gho's paper and GC's forum pictures (albeit each of differing quality) both show that hairs are sprouting from red holes... So to say we can't see something that is probably regeneration is rediculous

So when are you getting it done bro?

[NeedHairASAP]

I am seeing some fine hairs - which might get stronger - and from your pictures on hairsite, I am seeing FUEs taken from an extremely dense donor area in the first place.

It will be hard to establish whether the hairs have regenerated in the donor area, because there are no close ups.

Also, we can't really see how the fine 0.6mm holes are - or how they compare to 1mm holes for instance. It looks good, but so do good 1mm FUE sites.

To me, it looks like another carefully selected Gho patient, with no conclusive pictures.

Whether you are in on it or not is beside the point. The pictures can not prove donor regeneration.

I hope it works out for you.

Anyone else going to Gho - PLEASE INSIST ON BETTER PHOTOS.

a. is Dean Saunders a "carefully selected gho patient"? the guys nw7

b. We have close ups of GCs head. In them we see hairs sprouting from red holes.... GC is a third party and his outcome matches the peer-reviewed outcomes Gho had.. both Gho's paper and GC's forum pictures (albeit each of differing quality) both show that hairs are sprouting from red holes... So to say we can't see something that is probably regeneration is rediculous

[maxhair]

Yes its the circled area.

Good luck mate, you won't regret it.

I am seeing some fine hairs - which might get stronger - and from your pictures on hairsite, I am seeing FUEs taken from an extremely dense donor area in the first place.

It will be hard to establish whether the hairs have regenerated in the donor area, because there are no close ups.

Also, we can't really see how the fine 0.6mm holes are - or how they compare to 1mm holes for instance. It looks good, but so do good 1mm FUE sites.

To me, it looks like another carefully selected Gho patient, with no conclusive pictures.

Whether you are in on it or not is beside the point. The pictures can not prove donor regeneration.

I hope it works out for you.

Anyone else going to Gho - PLEASE INSIST ON BETTER PHOTOS.

[gc83uk]

Yes its the circled area.

Good luck mate, you won't regret it.

[jeffro5422]

Please don't hesitate to post as much as you want man. You seem to be the only Gho patient that visits these forums and is willing to document the process. Thank you for taking the time to do so.

Am I safe in assuming the circled area in the photo below is all transplanted hair?




And it was Marleen that I was speaking with over email. I thought that the language barrier might have been why she misinterpreted what I had said. I think I'm going to go ahead and book a procedure with Gho since the wait time is so long.

[gc83uk]

I don't want to get carried away with updates and bore you all, but this is the week 15 photo. I prob won't update for another 4 weeks or so after this one.

week 15 pic

[gc83uk]

maxhair, I wasn't a member on this site before I had the procedure, but I posted them at hairsite. I also posted this link on the previous page when Jeffro asked. I'm pretty sure its all there.

[maxhair]

Dawkins, yeah I do wish I'd had more, but I think it was wise to try a small number to start with.

I'm contemplating getting the maximum amount done on the next procedure.

And yes it was a type of alopecia, which ended up with me scratching my own hair out as a young child, the scalp was red and scaly and each flake of skin that fell had x many hairs attached, that lasted for a couple of years unfortunately.

Anyway thanks for all the encouraging comments needhairasap, dawkins, damiel and jeffro.

I've found your photo at week 5 and one at week 14, but what about one before the procedure?

[Reece]

Not gonna lie Dawkins, every once in a while you contribute with some useful info as you seem to be the sme on Gho but, your hypocritical attacks are getting a bit old. Do not knock an educated consumer for wanting a little more assurance when making a permanent and expensive descion when you yourself come up with a reason to wait that anyone should just as easily criticize.

This should not be a competition of he said she said and then throw it in their face when their wrong. If anything you are dissuading people from taking the plunge by questioning their descion making and research. I suggest a more cooperative and objective approach would be much more productive.

BTW, why wouldn't u wait until q1 2012 to see some data for the cell methods?

[The Alchemist]

Why can't you save money in between each session, instead of waiting to save until you have enough for multiple sessions? You still have to wait almost a year in between?

Because he's FOS.

[CVAZBAR]

Oh god do i have to repeat myself AGAIN why not?

DO i really have to?

No this time i wont do it, its ridicolous

Why can't you save money in between each session, instead of waiting to save until you have enough for multiple sessions? You still have to wait almost a year in between?