Is HASCI for real?

[RichardDawkins]

And it seems that their website is not up to date because i think those grafts are planted very close together and not like hasci always says 20 to 30 Grafts :-)

Its true what they say about Gho, he may be good at HM but his website pretty much sucks

[damielmillo]

Well, there is another guy in haarweb forum who get HST today....we can see the post here and translate...http://www.haarweb.nl/forum/showthre...593#post298593

1403 grafts.... some pictures

really small needle ....we will see the evolution of this guy...

[gc83uk]

That's great. The HSI as far as I know is the same price as HST, I wasn't actually given a choice, I just did as he advised.

You raise a good point about the labour intensity and I think it would be a good question to ask him. Obviously lead with the question is HST more labour intensive than HSI and if he says yes, then ask if there are any discounts for the less labour intensive HSI.

All the best for your consultation

[neversaynever]

@ gc83uk

Finally got a consultation with gho booked in London.

You had the injection method, was wondering if that works out cheaper? Its alot less labour, so really it makes sense if it was cheaper.....

[25 going on 65]

Not enough good visual evidence yet IMO. And the before & after results don't look impressive so far.
If their technique is legitimate then at some point they will be able to show restored NW1-2's with no obvious diffuse thinness, assuming they have someone with the skill to do it.

[RichardDawkins]

I dont WANT WANT WANT to be optimistic, i am optimistic because of the given proof.

Btw where is your proof that Cooley didnt work on you with his approach?

People can tell a lot of things on the internet. So where is your proof

[maxhair]

No Rassman has become very silent on his blog strangely :-)

No more HM attacks, at least not that harsh anymore. I wonder what happened.

He even believes that HM must bring your density back. Yeah yeah right Rassman, was the fire too much to handle, when patients educate surgeons

But yeah maxhair seems to be one of Rassmans last Army guys :-)

I understand why you want to be optimistic about a procedure that might work, as I was before I wasted a load of money with Cooley on "autocloning" - it sucks to be young and bald and not a candidate for a traditional HT - but it sucks even more to be all of those things and down several thousand pounds, dollars or euros.

[RichardDawkins]

No Rassman has become very silent on his blog strangely :-)

No more HM attacks, at least not that harsh anymore. I wonder what happened.

He even believes that HM must bring your density back. Yeah yeah right Rassman, was the fire too much to handle, when patients educate surgeons

But yeah maxhair seems to be one of Rassmans last Army guys :-)

[NeedHairASAP]

did we ever confirm that maxhair is rassman?

[RichardDawkins]

Well for the fact that you dont care about me, you scream a lot :-)

[CVAZBAR]

Yadda Yadda bla bla

I am not 00% sold bla bla. You are not sold because you are just an ignorant person who is ignoring the following things

1) lesser downtime
2) no shotgun scars

Ahh ahhh ahh bla bla i am CVAZBAR and i am not 100% sold..... ell then you are just stupid cause even compared to FUE this HST
is superior in downtime and scarring.

Even if you would not take donor regeneration into counting, HST is superior and you and your dimwits tell me they are not sold.
Guess what buddy, get yourself a nice FUT at Bosley, get a hair tattoo by rassman afterwards and then cry later and search for a cheap surgeon who can do repair work.
Cause you are 100% sold on this

Hahaha I don't take clowns like you serious. You ****ing low life! Everyone knows you talk your shit because you're behind the computer, probably hiding in a ****ing cave. Its easy to point out pussies like you. Cry all you want bitch, I don't give a shit what you think.

You guys want to know how much of a lame Richie Dorkins is?

The clown states that I'm completely ignoring the limited scarring hahaha???? I thought I made it clear that this would be the reason why I would go to Gho ha.

There you have it folks! I present to you, Richard Dawkins!

[RichardDawkins]

Yadda Yadda bla bla

I am not 00% sold bla bla. You are not sold because you are just an ignorant person who is ignoring the following things

1) lesser downtime
2) no shotgun scars

Ahh ahhh ahh bla bla i am CVAZBAR and i am not 100% sold..... ell then you are just stupid cause even compared to FUE this HST is superior in downtime and scarring.

Even if you would not take donor regeneration into counting, HST is superior and you and your dimwits tell me they are not sold.

Guess what buddy, get yourself a nice FUT at Bosley, get a hair tattoo by rassman afterwards and then cry later and search for a cheap surgeon who can do repair work.

Cause you are 100% sold on this

[CVAZBAR]

you should suggest to Gho, in a friendly way, that maybe he can put up more proof? He'll probably respond saying he showed macro photography of regrowth in tattooed areas, but if there is anything he could do, he should do it.


If anybody has any idea of a better way to prove regrowth than is shown in the peer reviewed article, please post your suggestions here..


CV and REESE may want to suggest what would give them more peace of mind than the peer reviewed article allows for-- I mean this politely

Never did I say there was zero evidence. Not sure where you got that from. I just said I was not in 100%. If you've seen all you have to see to get it done, that's great. Ill be excited to follow your progress and maybe I'll get closer to that 100. Like I said, I rather follow you since you are a regular here. I you do go with it, I wish you the best. Maybe I'll be next, I just like to take my time.

[CVAZBAR]

No medication as such, only minox, I haven't really been using it if i'm honest, might remember once a week to spray some on.

Hi neversaynever, I had HSI, which is basically the same as HST except with hsi, the hair is 'injected' into the scalp at the same time as the hole in the scalp is made. I think with hst, the hole is created first and then the hair is inserted later. That's the simplest form of explanation, there is a load more detail at hasci.com

Thanks! Im interested to see your progress without an anti-androgen.

[NeedHairASAP]

http://www.hasci.com/uploads/downloads/dad01225-0ceb-4a30-90c4-771ed900f25aHSI%20-%20Artikel_Gho%20Neumann.pdf

the graph at the top of page 2 shows they pretty much did areas of 150 grafts..with data results.. .. but I guess this is all fabricated?

page 4 shows you an example of the .06 graft compared to a 1.0 graft -- this is practically what you're asking for when you ask for proof he can do a .06 graft.

page 8 has some really good tattood areas that all you guys are asking for (its not a one FU experiment but close)










Does this excerpt sound like a liar wrote it?


"Multiplication of the hairs
If we assume that the number of hairs left behind in the donor area (Table VI, column b) were the visible hairs directly after the extraction (Table II, column d) plus the visible hairs in the unsuitable incomplete follicular unit grafts (Table I, column g), the number of hairs which are multiplied varied between 169 and 271 hairs (mean 212.4 hairs) (Table VI, column f). This means a multiplication rate between 83.2% and 102.1% (mean 93.3%) (Table VI, column g)."


source: page 9, http://www.hasci.com/uploads/downloa...%20Neumann.pdf