Replicel

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Kiwi
    Senior Member
    • Mar 2011
    • 1087

    Originally posted by UK_
    Women will be oppressed no matter what - take away the whole FEM-DOM consumption machine and you're oppressing women, introduce it and you're objectifying them (another form of oppression) - feminism is the disease here - no matter what steps you take, feminism will never have its thirst sated, only until it gains what it initially set out to do - which is to eliminate all forms of mammalian prevalence on this planet shall it be contented with its sadistic, manipulative, racist, radical & selfish actions.

    The greatest website ever:

    http://www.manwomanmyth.com/
    LOL - thats the funniest thing I've read all day... okay here's a good joke for you.

    Woman constantly carry on about how they can fake an orgasm for the sake of the relationship, but we all know that the real heroes are us men that can fake a relationship for the sake on an orgasm.

    Tracey - Please don't hate me!!!!

    Comment

    • The Alchemist
      Senior Member
      • Mar 2011
      • 261

      Originally posted by Knockin on NW4
      Replicel is doing a presentation and update September 11th at 2:25 PM ET in the Starlight South suite at the Waldorf Astoria hotel in New York. We actually get a webcast this time.


      http://www.replicel.com/replicel-to-...nt-conference/

      Listened to the presentation, nothing new there. Maybe a few details about their dosing protocol for phase II. However, what i found disappointing was that they don't intend to update with the 12 month results from phase I. I could've swore they had an interval timepoint of 6 and 12 months...but i guess not. We won't hear anything about that study until the 24 month timepoint.

      Comment

      • Kiwi
        Senior Member
        • Mar 2011
        • 1087

        Originally posted by The Alchemist
        Listened to the presentation, nothing new there. Maybe a few details about their dosing protocol for phase II. However, what i found disappointing was that they don't intend to update with the 12 month results from phase I. I could've swore they had an interval timepoint of 6 and 12 months...but i guess not. We won't hear anything about that study until the 24 month timepoint.
        Seriously... did somebody think that there would be something new?

        Comment

        • The Alchemist
          Senior Member
          • Mar 2011
          • 261

          Originally posted by Kiwi
          Seriously... did somebody think that there would be something new?
          Yeah, there was something new...we won't hear squat about phase 1 from them until the 24 month time point.

          Comment

          • rdawg
            Senior Member
            • Jun 2012
            • 996

            Originally posted by The Alchemist
            Yeah, there was something new...we won't hear squat about phase 1 from them until the 24 month time point.
            all that tells me is the results they wanted have not happened and are back at the drawing board.

            Replicel still has promise to it, it's just a bit behind at this point and who knows when they'll get the right formula.

            Comment

            • bananana
              Inactive
              • Feb 2012
              • 524

              How come they didnt even recognize histogen as a competitor?
              Only aderans...

              Comment

              • Kiwi
                Senior Member
                • Mar 2011
                • 1087

                Originally posted by bananana
                How come they didnt even recognize histogen as a competitor?
                Only aderans...
                It does not matter why. And unless you're a mind reader with god like omnipresence we'll never know.

                Personally I could not careless.

                Comment

                • bananana
                  Inactive
                  • Feb 2012
                  • 524

                  Originally posted by Kiwi
                  It does not matter why. And unless you're a mind reader with god like omnipresence we'll never know.

                  Personally I could not careless.
                  Agreed with you. I was just curious... Well, we'll have to wait at least a year to see some new results. The thing I'm most "worried" about is they already injected millions of cells and good poor results (lets be honest - if they have some new great results - we would have known by now), now they'll be lowering the dose and hoping for better ones. Hm...

                  Comment

                  • UK_
                    Senior Member
                    • Feb 2011
                    • 2691

                    Originally posted by bananana
                    Agreed with you. I was just curious... Well, we'll have to wait at least a year to see some new results. The thing I'm most "worried" about is they already injected millions of cells and good poor results (lets be honest - if they have some new great results - we would have known by now), now they'll be lowering the dose and hoping for better ones. Hm...
                    Ive been thinking about this for a while too - why would a lesser dose result in greater efficacy? Well I realised that with cell therapy that is actually often the case! There is often a 'dose range' that the researchers have discovered was successful in animal models prior - a dose range that was more effective than significantly higher doses.

                    Now the very fact that Replicel increased their dose significantly helped their cause more than anything, because they proved safety, which dramatically reduces the time of clinical trials.

                    I dont think efficacy can be found through injecting huge amounts of cells, I believe smaller doses say 3 - 4 times a year will give you the results of 60 - 70% regrowth.

                    Comment

                    • bananana
                      Inactive
                      • Feb 2012
                      • 524

                      Originally posted by UK_
                      Ive been thinking about this for a while too - why would a lesser dose result in greater efficacy? Well I realised that with cell therapy that is actually often the case! There is often a 'dose range' that the researchers have discovered was successful in animal models prior - a dose range that was more effective than significantly higher doses.

                      Now the very fact that Replicel increased their dose significantly helped their cause more than anything, because they proved safety, which dramatically reduces the time of clinical trials.

                      I dont think efficacy can be found through injecting huge amounts of cells, I believe smaller doses say 3 - 4 times a year will give you the results of 60 - 70% regrowth.
                      Interesting view. I sure hope you're right about the regrowth with smaller amount of cells. It does sound kind of logical.

                      Comment

                      • dex89
                        Senior Member
                        • Jul 2012
                        • 808

                        so how does this work? is this some kind of a hair transplant, oral pill, cream?

                        Comment

                        • tonypizza
                          Member
                          • Jul 2011
                          • 47

                          Originally posted by dex89
                          so how does this work? is this some kind of a hair transplant, oral pill, cream?
                          It works by removing enough dollars from your wallet that you are convinced of a 13% increase in vellus hairs when in front of a mirror.

                          Kind of like Propecia

                          Comment

                          • dex89
                            Senior Member
                            • Jul 2012
                            • 808

                            Originally posted by tonypizza
                            It works by removing enough dollars from your wallet that you are convinced of a 13% increase in vellus hairs when in front of a mirror.

                            Kind of like Propecia
                            SPLENDID!

                            10char

                            Comment

                            • Kirby_
                              Senior Member
                              • Jan 2012
                              • 439

                              It's funny because it's true.

                              Comment

                              • krewel
                                Senior Member
                                • Aug 2011
                                • 187



                                Here a little video about Yales hair research. They actually confirm Dr.Hoffmanns / Replicels thesis about dermal sheeth cup cells..

                                Comment

                                Working...