Replicel

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • neversaynever
    replied
    Originally posted by JDW
    Also, Based on the primary results replicel at the minimum, even with no regrowth, should stop future loss and prevent progression of MPB...this to me is a success
    This is my thoughts on replicel. I think they have more of a chance of immunizing than growing thousands of new follicles.

    Really think they are missing the key. So many have tried injecting cells now, and have failed, or at best have inconsistent results. Im sure replicel are working hard on trying to find out how many injected cells are being recruited etc etc.

    Fingers crossed they'll have good news at the end of the year.

    Fingers crossed histogen has amazing results end of the year.

    Leave a comment:


  • 25 going on 65
    replied
    Originally posted by JDW
    Also, Based on the primary results replicel at the minimum, even with no regrowth, should stop future loss and prevent progression of MPB...this to me is a success
    If this proves correct it would be a monumental accomplishment even with 0% regrowth.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sogeking
    replied
    Originally posted by JDW
    Also, Based on the primary results replicel at the minimum, even with no regrowth, should stop future loss and prevent progression of MPB...this to me is a success
    If it is proven than yes. So far it is just speculation.

    Leave a comment:


  • JDW
    replied
    Also, Based on the primary results replicel at the minimum, even with no regrowth, should stop future loss and prevent progression of MPB...this to me is a success

    Leave a comment:


  • Tracy C
    replied
    Originally posted by bananana
    Any news? Whats the next milestone?
    It is much too soon for any new news. We need to wait for the 12 month mark on those phase I/IIa subjects - and the six month mark for the phase IIb subjects.



    Originally posted by bananana
    Or all eyes are on histogen now?
    I still find this mind set to be very odd. I just don't see the point in rooting for one company or the other - or bashing on one company to favor another. The more companies working on this problem the better. I don't care who wins. As long as somebody wins, we all win.

    Leave a comment:


  • bananana
    replied
    thanks UK,
    i'm just speaking as a plain layman.

    Just wanted to "bump" the thread, see maybe someone got news or sth..

    Leave a comment:


  • UK_
    replied
    Originally posted by NotBelievingIt
    The stock price of a baby bio-tech with no product is practically meaningless.
    I was about to post the exact same comment about an hour ago but I just couldnt be bothered lol.

    What matters is:

    "Do the researchers have enough funds for Phase 2?" - YES

    "Do the researchers feel a phase 1 result warrants a phase 2?" - YES

    But obviously the "Replicel-bashing forum crew" are experts on this subject, just like how Histogen bashers on Hairsite were experts about "wnt ligands not being able to grow new hair follicles".

    Leave a comment:


  • NotBelievingIt
    replied
    Originally posted by bananana
    Well, you may be right, but I'm wondering whats replicels next move?
    Their stock is way below 1$ now, they'll have to provide some good results in the coming months. Or else..
    The stock price of a baby bio-tech with no product is practically meaningless.

    Leave a comment:


  • bananana
    replied
    Originally posted by Kiwi
    What do you mean "now"?

    The only eyes on Replicel were those that belonged to TBT newbies that were too excited (blinded by the medusa aka replicel marketing team) to listen to the older members telling them to relax...
    Well, you may be right, but I'm wondering whats replicels next move?
    Their stock is way below 1$ now, they'll have to provide some good results in the coming months. Or else..

    Leave a comment:


  • Kiwi
    replied
    Originally posted by bananana
    The topic is a bit dead, I see.

    Any news? Whats the next milestone?
    Or all eyes are on histogen now?
    What do you mean "now"?

    The only eyes on Replicel were those that belonged to TBT newbies that were too excited (blinded by the medusa aka replicel marketing team) to listen to the older members telling them to relax...

    Leave a comment:


  • bananana
    replied
    The topic is a bit dead, I see.

    Any news? Whats the next milestone?
    Or all eyes are on histogen now?

    Leave a comment:


  • Maradona
    replied
    Originally posted by TrueGround
    Maradona,

    I know you want these treatments to work, and I honestly respect your opinions when you use your head before posting them. The thing that really pisses me off most is when you and others state negative comments so matter-of-factually. I know you are basing your opinion of Replicel on past HM techniques, but this is NOT a past HM technique. Its a CURRENT (technically future) and DIFFERENT approach.

    Just quit saying things like "this won't work" or "this company is a total bust" - or whatever it is you're saying along those lines, like you can predict the f*cking future! Not trying to bash on you here, but you know by now that these comments piss people off and I'm beginning to think you do it for attention.

    You could be right and you could be dead wrong about what this treatment will offer in its maturity. Fact is, NOBODY knows for sure yet! DAMNIT!!!!

    Yeah of course we exaggerate sometimes. This is a balding forum bro, we are all like that, at least most of us.

    I'm just not holding my breath over it. I am a nobody so you might as well ignore my opinion, no sarcasm intended.

    Who knows? It might bring something good at the end.

    Leave a comment:


  • TrueGround
    replied
    Maradona,

    I know you want these treatments to work, and I honestly respect your opinions when you use your head before posting them. The thing that really pisses me off most is when you and others state negative comments so matter-of-factually. I know you are basing your opinion of Replicel on past HM techniques, but this is NOT a past HM technique. Its a CURRENT (technically future) and DIFFERENT approach.

    Just quit saying things like "this won't work" or "this company is a total bust" - or whatever it is you're saying along those lines, like you can predict the f*cking future! Not trying to bash on you here, but you know by now that these comments piss people off and I'm beginning to think you do it for attention.

    You could be right and you could be dead wrong about what this treatment will offer in its maturity. Fact is, NOBODY knows for sure yet! DAMNIT!!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • Maradona
    replied
    Originally posted by NotDyingBald
    Thanks Kiwi, for supporting what i´ve said.
    Bro I am just basing my facts on past HM techniques.

    Replicel is using a different cell, it may all well shit on any other past HM technique that involved replicating cells.

    At this point we know it's results are no different than past HM techniques.

    But good shit could happen down the road, bro.

    Leave a comment:


  • NotDyingBald
    replied
    Originally posted by NotDyingBald
    So some of this forum users should start using it giving their opinions and contributions based on evidence and studys made by people who has the credits for it. Everyone has the right to their opinion for sure, but not based on anything.
    Originally posted by Kiwi
    Replicel should not have created all the hype they did. It was cruel - and now they suck.
    Thanks Kiwi, for supporting what i´ve said.

    Leave a comment:

Working...