Replicel
Collapse
X
-
I don't know why people expected to see much regrowth at 6 months. All treatments at the moment usually don't show any cosmetic difference at 6 months (fin, minox etc) so why would people assume replicel would have a cosmetic difference at 6 months. -
Well said JPM, some folk want a pic of an afro created from a small dose of Replicel, on a Norwood 5 before they truly believe the science.Leave a comment:
-
I think what people need to remember is that growing hair takes a long time. in the second picture there seems to be an increase in thin hairs, which will thicken (hopefully) over time. if you think when a baby is born, they have really thin wispy hair and this soon thickens in 18 - 24 months....we just have to be patient.
I think a lot of people are comparing to Histogen which showed a cosmetic difference in only 3 months. This is a totally different approach than histogen, and we just have to have patience.Leave a comment:
-
I think if that person's hair grew out you would hardly even notice that section was balding.
That said, it's definitely the same area and there is definitely a substantial increase in vellus hairs. All depends on whether those hairs become terminal.
But if their best result is growing small amounts of hair on an already basically full-coverage scalp, they have problems. If those new hairs don't become terminal at 12 months, they have real problems.Leave a comment:
-
Those results are pathetic.
I don't know if I should laugh or cry when looking at them.Leave a comment:
-
this might also help you identify new hairs, but, there doesn't seem to be many. this could be a big deal if the hairs started to get bigger, but they dont seem like much currently... and should be thicker by now I would think.
can someone lay the negative of the second photo on top of the first photo and match the tattoos?Leave a comment:
-
Balls. That's disappointing. Oh well. Anyone find the Aderans video where Dr. Washenik shows one of their before and afters? Might make a nice comparison.Leave a comment:
-
One picture has one tattoo the other has two tatttoos. are you saying that they put a second tattoo on his head? And there is a terminal hair growing out of one tattoo.Leave a comment:
-
I guess it is the same picture now that I look at itLeave a comment:
-
two diff patients?
They look different but not in a good way.
The tattoos look different. And in one picture there is a terminal hair growing out of one tattoo and not the other picture. the new hairs are velus or small and thin so it can't be a new hair.Leave a comment:
-
It doesn't even look like the same area of hair.. does anybody have the ability to lay the pictures over each other with a photo program? make sure you match the right tattoosLeave a comment:
-
I see alot more new thin hairs...does that mean eventually those hairs will get thick and strong?Leave a comment:
-
I wonder if 15% would look more significant on entire treated head of let's say a NW3 with a full head shot picture.Leave a comment:
-
thats not just you....
so.... they only seem to report hair densities in this.... no total hair count increases
maybe people should check out my betamethasone veratal or cobetal portionate threads..... or some gho threads.... because this is well.... underwhelming by a very very very long shotLeave a comment:
-
Leave a comment: