Replicel

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • jpm
    replied
    I don't know why people expected to see much regrowth at 6 months. All treatments at the moment usually don't show any cosmetic difference at 6 months (fin, minox etc) so why would people assume replicel would have a cosmetic difference at 6 months.

    Leave a comment:


  • 67mph
    replied
    Well said JPM, some folk want a pic of an afro created from a small dose of Replicel, on a Norwood 5 before they truly believe the science.

    Leave a comment:


  • jpm
    replied
    I think what people need to remember is that growing hair takes a long time. in the second picture there seems to be an increase in thin hairs, which will thicken (hopefully) over time. if you think when a baby is born, they have really thin wispy hair and this soon thickens in 18 - 24 months....we just have to be patient.

    I think a lot of people are comparing to Histogen which showed a cosmetic difference in only 3 months. This is a totally different approach than histogen, and we just have to have patience.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pate
    replied
    I think if that person's hair grew out you would hardly even notice that section was balding.

    That said, it's definitely the same area and there is definitely a substantial increase in vellus hairs. All depends on whether those hairs become terminal.

    But if their best result is growing small amounts of hair on an already basically full-coverage scalp, they have problems. If those new hairs don't become terminal at 12 months, they have real problems.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mojo Risin
    replied
    Those results are pathetic.
    I don't know if I should laugh or cry when looking at them.

    Leave a comment:


  • NeedHairASAP
    replied
    Originally posted by Horseshoe
    One picture has one tattoo the other has two tatttoos. are you saying that they put a second tattoo on his head? And there is a terminal hair growing out of one tattoo.
    no, the photo says they added another tattoo further into the trial. I'm saying the tattoo with a hair coming out of it is the second tattoo added later. if you identify the first tattoo in this way, then you can look and notice that the positioning of hairs around this first tattoo are the same in both pictures. I'm just saying that its definitely a picture of the same person.

    this might also help you identify new hairs, but, there doesn't seem to be many. this could be a big deal if the hairs started to get bigger, but they dont seem like much currently... and should be thicker by now I would think.





    can someone lay the negative of the second photo on top of the first photo and match the tattoos?

    Leave a comment:


  • Follicle Death Row
    replied
    Balls. That's disappointing. Oh well. Anyone find the Aderans video where Dr. Washenik shows one of their before and afters? Might make a nice comparison.

    Leave a comment:


  • Horseshoe
    replied
    Originally posted by NeedHairASAP
    thats the new tattoo that has the hair "growing" out of it


    I guess it is the same picture now that I look at it
    One picture has one tattoo the other has two tatttoos. are you saying that they put a second tattoo on his head? And there is a terminal hair growing out of one tattoo.

    Leave a comment:


  • NeedHairASAP
    replied
    Originally posted by Horseshoe
    They look different but not in a good way.
    The tattoos look different. And in one picture there is a terminal hair growing out of one tattoo and not the other picture. the new hairs are velus or small and thin so it can't be a new hair.
    thats the new tattoo that has the hair "growing" out of it


    I guess it is the same picture now that I look at it

    Leave a comment:


  • Horseshoe
    replied
    two diff patients?

    Originally posted by yeahyeahyeah
    Is it just me or do they look the same?
    They look different but not in a good way.
    The tattoos look different. And in one picture there is a terminal hair growing out of one tattoo and not the other picture. the new hairs are velus or small and thin so it can't be a new hair.

    Leave a comment:


  • NeedHairASAP
    replied
    It doesn't even look like the same area of hair.. does anybody have the ability to lay the pictures over each other with a photo program? make sure you match the right tattoos

    Leave a comment:


  • john2399
    replied
    I see alot more new thin hairs...does that mean eventually those hairs will get thick and strong?

    Leave a comment:


  • ccmethinning
    replied
    I wonder if 15% would look more significant on entire treated head of let's say a NW3 with a full head shot picture.

    Leave a comment:


  • NeedHairASAP
    replied
    Originally posted by yeahyeahyeah
    Is it just me or do they look the same?
    thats not just you....

    so.... they only seem to report hair densities in this.... no total hair count increases



    maybe people should check out my betamethasone veratal or cobetal portionate threads..... or some gho threads.... because this is well.... underwhelming by a very very very long shot

    Leave a comment:


  • yeahyeahyeah
    replied
    Originally posted by 2020


    ^ and that was the best responder
    Is it just me or do they look the same?

    Leave a comment:

Working...