not crazy. just the more I research, the more disappointed I become in those future treatments...
if it works the way I described in previous posts then no. Bald spots will fail to respond to "growth factors" just like they fail to respond to your body's own growth factors due to upregulated COX-2 enzyme.
Is it a coincidence that strong anti-inflammatories, botox, and thymosin grow hair like crazy?
Replicel
Collapse
X
-
Do you think Spencer could ask one of the researchers from one of the major companies their opinion on combining solutions from different companies in a separate clinical trial?
Lets say Histogen combine solutions with Replicel and conduct a phase I trial in say 20 patients?... the research for both solutions is there, we have mountains of it from over 30 years.
Would this be possible? I know they are competitors but perhaps merging they could actually come up with a treatment better than every other company in trials today, it would also work wonders for them financially.Leave a comment:
-
Talking about Histogen... when is Spencer going to have another interview with Gail? It's been over 2 years...
Leave a comment:
-
2020 if baldness is your main concern with becoming a steroid pumped superman then surely you should be on other forums that are all awaiting cures for the dozen other side effects associated with steroid use, namely liver tumours and heart attacks.Leave a comment:
-
I don't know what's happened to 2020. He's gone all crazy recently.
He used to bring up very good info on mechanisms of baldness and whatnot. Now he's just downtalking histogen.
HSC it's better than we all thought to be. The question is if it'll work on everyone !Leave a comment:
-
-
Cmon guys, stop with speculations, you actually know NOTHING whats going on at their labs or what the results will be.
This is just hearsay talk. Lets wait for the official results/interview.Leave a comment:
-
The criteria used for determining what constitutes a drug (from the standpoint of the FDA) has nothing to do with whether the effects are permanent. That isn't the factor that distinguishes drugs from cosmetics.Leave a comment:
-
not really I'm just saying if Histogen is going for a COSMETIC procedure rather than something MEDICAL(from the regenerative category) then they're wasting time because first, they don't have to go through FDA for that and second, we already have a bunch of peptides that regrow hair.
I hope I'm wrong and I hope that Histogen is much better than I imagine it to be
Leave a comment:
-
you gone crazy.not my point. If it's true that HSC results are temporary and they're not actually reversing MPB then they're wasting time and money. Temporary COSMETIC improvements don't need to go through those FDA phases I don't know why they're doing that then.
You want temporary hair? There you go:
Hello -- Have any of you used peps and experienced hair growth where before you were thinning/receding? Any experiences using PAL-GHK? or are there any other peptides shown to increase hair growth? Thank you for your feedback.
why wait for Histogen then?Leave a comment:
-
Why dont you let them get on with it, rather then speculate.you people still don't get it.... eventually you will be a NW6 right? The rest of the hair will start thinning too right? How are you planning to keep up with the CYCLING? not talking about density, I'm talking about CYCLING.
If you want some temporary hair there already are compounds that can regrow you that and that's my point - why do all this research if this is just another "boost" and not an actual reversal of a condition? Why go through all those clinical phases? I understand why Replicel and Aderans have to go but in the case of Histogen I don't. They're either wasting time or hiding something from usLeave a comment:
-
not my point. If it's true that HSC results are temporary and they're not actually reversing MPB then they're wasting time and money. Temporary COSMETIC improvements don't need to go through those FDA phases I don't know why they're doing that then.
You want temporary hair? There you go:
Hello -- Have any of you used peps and experienced hair growth where before you were thinning/receding? Any experiences using PAL-GHK? or are there any other peptides shown to increase hair growth? Thank you for your feedback.
why wait for Histogen then?Leave a comment:
-
we all get it, 2020. I'll take 2 years too. We are not gonna live forever you know? Hopefully I can use histogen until my mid 30s then **** it, razor time !!!!!!!!you people still don't get it.... eventually you will be a NW6 right? The rest of the hair will start thinning too right? How are you planning to keep up with the CYCLING? not talking about density, I'm talking about CYCLING.
If you want some temporary hair there already are compounds that can regrow you that and that's my point - why do all this research if this is just another "boost" and not an actual reversal of a condition? Why go through all those clinical phases? I understand why Replicel and Aderans have to go but in the case of Histogen I don't. They're either wasting time or hiding something from usLeave a comment:
-
you people still don't get it.... eventually you will be a NW6 right? The rest of the hair will start thinning too right? How are you planning to keep up with the CYCLING? not talking about density, I'm talking about CYCLING.
If you want some temporary hair there already are compounds that can regrow you that and that's my point - why do all this research if this is just another "boost" and not an actual reversal of a condition? Why go through all those clinical phases? I understand why Replicel and Aderans have to go but in the case of Histogen I don't. They're either wasting time or hiding something from usLeave a comment:
-
Im excited about HSC. But I must say, the results theyve made public so far are still very vague. Not that its important what we think, given their priority right now is investment.
Not long before we know more.Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: