Replicel

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 2020
    replied
    Originally posted by Maradona
    I don't know what's happened to 2020. He's gone all crazy recently.
    He used to bring up very good info on mechanisms of baldness and whatnot. Now he's just downtalking histogen.
    not crazy. just the more I research, the more disappointed I become in those future treatments...

    Originally posted by Maradona
    HSC it's better than we all thought to be. The question is if it'll work on everyone !
    if it works the way I described in previous posts then no. Bald spots will fail to respond to "growth factors" just like they fail to respond to your body's own growth factors due to upregulated COX-2 enzyme.

    Is it a coincidence that strong anti-inflammatories, botox, and thymosin grow hair like crazy?

    Leave a comment:


  • UK_
    replied
    Do you think Spencer could ask one of the researchers from one of the major companies their opinion on combining solutions from different companies in a separate clinical trial?

    Lets say Histogen combine solutions with Replicel and conduct a phase I trial in say 20 patients?... the research for both solutions is there, we have mountains of it from over 30 years.

    Would this be possible? I know they are competitors but perhaps merging they could actually come up with a treatment better than every other company in trials today, it would also work wonders for them financially.

    Leave a comment:


  • UK_
    replied
    Talking about Histogen... when is Spencer going to have another interview with Gail? It's been over 2 years...

    Leave a comment:


  • UK_
    replied
    2020 if baldness is your main concern with becoming a steroid pumped superman then surely you should be on other forums that are all awaiting cures for the dozen other side effects associated with steroid use, namely liver tumours and heart attacks.

    Leave a comment:


  • Maradona
    replied
    Originally posted by yeahyeahyeah
    I think 2020 shouldnt get HSC when it comes out.
    I don't know what's happened to 2020. He's gone all crazy recently.
    He used to bring up very good info on mechanisms of baldness and whatnot. Now he's just downtalking histogen.

    HSC it's better than we all thought to be. The question is if it'll work on everyone !

    Leave a comment:


  • yeahyeahyeah
    replied
    Originally posted by bananana
    Cmon guys, stop with speculations, you actually know NOTHING whats going on at their labs or what the results will be.

    This is just hearsay talk. Lets wait for the official results/interview.
    I think 2020 shouldnt get HSC when it comes out.

    Leave a comment:


  • bananana
    replied
    Cmon guys, stop with speculations, you actually know NOTHING whats going on at their labs or what the results will be.

    This is just hearsay talk. Lets wait for the official results/interview.

    Leave a comment:


  • gmonasco
    replied
    Originally posted by 2020
    not really I'm just saying if Histogen is going for a COSMETIC procedure rather than something MEDICAL(from the regenerative category) then they're wasting time because first, they don't have to go through FDA for that
    The criteria used for determining what constitutes a drug (from the standpoint of the FDA) has nothing to do with whether the effects are permanent. That isn't the factor that distinguishes drugs from cosmetics.

    Leave a comment:


  • 2020
    replied
    Originally posted by Maradona
    you gone crazy.
    not really I'm just saying if Histogen is going for a COSMETIC procedure rather than something MEDICAL(from the regenerative category) then they're wasting time because first, they don't have to go through FDA for that and second, we already have a bunch of peptides that regrow hair.

    I hope I'm wrong and I hope that Histogen is much better than I imagine it to be

    Leave a comment:


  • Maradona
    replied
    Originally posted by 2020
    not my point. If it's true that HSC results are temporary and they're not actually reversing MPB then they're wasting time and money. Temporary COSMETIC improvements don't need to go through those FDA phases I don't know why they're doing that then.
    You want temporary hair? There you go:


    Hello -- Have any of you used peps and experienced hair growth where before you were thinning/receding? Any experiences using PAL-GHK? or are there any other peptides shown to increase hair growth? Thank you for your feedback.


    why wait for Histogen then?
    you gone crazy.

    Leave a comment:


  • yeahyeahyeah
    replied
    Originally posted by 2020
    you people still don't get it.... eventually you will be a NW6 right? The rest of the hair will start thinning too right? How are you planning to keep up with the CYCLING? not talking about density, I'm talking about CYCLING.

    If you want some temporary hair there already are compounds that can regrow you that and that's my point - why do all this research if this is just another "boost" and not an actual reversal of a condition? Why go through all those clinical phases? I understand why Replicel and Aderans have to go but in the case of Histogen I don't. They're either wasting time or hiding something from us
    Why dont you let them get on with it, rather then speculate.

    Leave a comment:


  • 2020
    replied
    Originally posted by Maradona
    we all get it, 2020. I'll take 2 years too. We are not gonna live forever you know? Hopefully I can use histogen until my mid 30s then **** it, razor time !!!!!!!!
    not my point. If it's true that HSC results are temporary and they're not actually reversing MPB then they're wasting time and money. Temporary COSMETIC improvements don't need to go through those FDA phases I don't know why they're doing that then.
    You want temporary hair? There you go:


    Hello -- Have any of you used peps and experienced hair growth where before you were thinning/receding? Any experiences using PAL-GHK? or are there any other peptides shown to increase hair growth? Thank you for your feedback.


    why wait for Histogen then?

    Leave a comment:


  • Maradona
    replied
    Originally posted by 2020
    you people still don't get it.... eventually you will be a NW6 right? The rest of the hair will start thinning too right? How are you planning to keep up with the CYCLING? not talking about density, I'm talking about CYCLING.

    If you want some temporary hair there already are compounds that can regrow you that and that's my point - why do all this research if this is just another "boost" and not an actual reversal of a condition? Why go through all those clinical phases? I understand why Replicel and Aderans have to go but in the case of Histogen I don't. They're either wasting time or hiding something from us
    we all get it, 2020. I'll take 2 years too. We are not gonna live forever you know? Hopefully I can use histogen until my mid 30s then **** it, razor time !!!!!!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • 2020
    replied
    Originally posted by neversaynever
    Ill take two years of hair, please!
    you people still don't get it.... eventually you will be a NW6 right? The rest of the hair will start thinning too right? How are you planning to keep up with the CYCLING? not talking about density, I'm talking about CYCLING.

    If you want some temporary hair there already are compounds that can regrow you that and that's my point - why do all this research if this is just another "boost" and not an actual reversal of a condition? Why go through all those clinical phases? I understand why Replicel and Aderans have to go but in the case of Histogen I don't. They're either wasting time or hiding something from us

    Leave a comment:


  • neversaynever
    replied
    Im excited about HSC. But I must say, the results theyve made public so far are still very vague. Not that its important what we think, given their priority right now is investment.

    Not long before we know more.

    Leave a comment:

Working...