CB-03-01 - new antiandrogenic

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • jjo
    replied
    Originally posted by lilpauly
    Hi man it was in the Cosmo presrntaion
    do you know more about it than most people?

    Leave a comment:


  • lilpauly
    replied
    Originally posted by jjo
    how do you know?
    Hi man it was in the Cosmo presrntaion

    Leave a comment:


  • jjo
    replied
    Originally posted by lilpauly
    They actually trying a gel formula right now in trials

    how do you know?

    Leave a comment:


  • lilpauly
    replied
    Originally posted by breakbot
    Nobody knows if they found for the alopecia version the right vehicle although they are working on a lotion by cosmo's presentation.
    Iontophoresis was used in European trials.
    It is very difficult to achieve the iontophoresis results anyway, but this doesn't mean they will have no success.
    Sorry for my English.
    They actually trying a gel formula right now in trials

    Leave a comment:


  • burtandernie
    replied
    I know a long time is the right answer, but what year does the timeline predict this is going to come out?

    Leave a comment:


  • breakbot
    replied
    Originally posted by maomao
    I've been reading the presentations on this - and one question.

    Have they even used a chemical vehicle for the alopecia treatment? I only see mention of the iontophoresis.

    If not - does this mean they are also still trying to work one out? (Or did I miss something somewhere?)
    Nobody knows if they found for the alopecia version the right vehicle although they are working on a lotion by cosmo's presentation.
    Iontophoresis was used in European trials.
    It is very difficult to achieve the iontophoresis results anyway, but this doesn't mean they will have no success.
    Sorry for my English.

    Leave a comment:


  • maomao
    replied
    I've been reading the presentations on this - and one question.

    Have they even used a chemical vehicle for the alopecia treatment? I only see mention of the iontophoresis.

    If not - does this mean they are also still trying to work one out? (Or did I miss something somewhere?)

    Leave a comment:


  • jason1001
    replied
    The problem is what if it doesn't come out in 4 years or by the time it does you've lost all your hair.

    Leave a comment:


  • Potm22
    replied
    Originally posted by burtandernie
    How many human studies were done with RU? I find it hard to believe they tested RU in humans and then after seeing how well it worked they decided there was not enough money so they shelved it or couldnt find a partner for it.
    I just dont think it works, it has sides, its too large a molecule, it doesnt penetrate well enough or one of a hundred other technical reasons it doesnt work. So then every guy on here sees what he wants as he uses it along with other treatments and we never know whether it really works or not. Its a big crap shoot and its silly. I guess if your desperate though its worth a shot. Hopefully it has no sides.
    Judging by experiences from ppl who already tried it, severe sides seem really rare. And yes there might be a slight chance there are "hidden" longterm sides. But still, if theres a product that gives me a 1% chance of stopping my hairloss, i will alwaaaaays give it a try, even if it would cost me 1000$ per g or whatever. Guess ppl just got different views on that kind of stuff, which is perfectly fine.

    Leave a comment:


  • hellouser
    replied
    Originally posted by burtandernie
    How many human studies were done with RU? I find it hard to believe they tested RU in humans and then after seeing how well it worked they decided there was not enough money so they shelved it or couldnt find a partner for it.
    I just dont think it works, it has sides, its too large a molecule, it doesnt penetrate well enough or one of a hundred other technical reasons it doesnt work. So then every guy on here sees what he wants as he uses it along with other treatments and we never know whether it really works or not. Its a big crap shoot and its silly. I guess if your desperate though its worth a shot. Hopefully it has no sides.
    The same should be asked about NEOSH and Aderans.

    Leave a comment:


  • burtandernie
    replied
    How many human studies were done with RU? I find it hard to believe they tested RU in humans and then after seeing how well it worked they decided there was not enough money so they shelved it or couldnt find a partner for it.
    I just dont think it works, it has sides, its too large a molecule, it doesnt penetrate well enough or one of a hundred other technical reasons it doesnt work. So then every guy on here sees what he wants as he uses it along with other treatments and we never know whether it really works or not. Its a big crap shoot and its silly. I guess if your desperate though its worth a shot. Hopefully it has no sides.

    Leave a comment:


  • Potm22
    replied
    Would love to give CB a try after i used RU for at least a few months.
    Is there a "common" statement yet on what ppl that used it already BELIEVE to be the best vehicle? So that i know what i should use.

    Also does anyone know a decent blog or sth of someone reporting his CB results and maybe giving some advice that helps noobs like me getting started? for ru the Hellouserthread(god bless him) was obv a lifesaver, was hoping that there is sth similar for CB around? havent found anything while googling

    Leave a comment:


  • cichlidfort
    replied
    Originally posted by jason1001
    Is Ru out now?
    I never see much people posting about it.
    ...because you're not looking.

    Leave a comment:


  • jason1001
    replied
    Is Ru out now?
    I never see much people posting about it.

    Leave a comment:


  • Auld Reekie
    replied
    Originally posted by cichlidfort
    For a lot of us, it's terrible news. But in the general big picture of balding, it's awesome. In 3-4 years we'll have something that will knock hairloss in the teeth. In theory, CB is a 1000 times better than fin because of the no sides and efficacy of it.
    Is it 1000 times better than RU? I thought RU was a side-free (or at least vastly reduced sides) topical alternative to finasteride. Isn't it?

    Leave a comment:

Working...