I feel like the average poster on here is <20 years old and hasn't yet learned how to think or write. How do you 100% know anything about this? This 2014 dude is killing me, please stop posting. All you do is speak from your hopes and use faulty logic. Just because a drug can theoretically do something doesn't mean it will. Ramatroban and cetrizine and OC are all compounds that are incredibly similar to Setipriprant, and none of them have been miraculous for balding. They have all had side effects, some quite serious. I was only trying to raise these issues before people go and get HTs hoping that this is the cure. We have no idea if this will come to fruition or whether it will work. A good example is Actelion's trials for the sea drug on allergies. They were convinced that it would work on allergies for 3 trials before they abandoned it. You don't know jack shit. I was pointing out that antihistamines can have really shitty side effects, that being drowsy all day or having a headache all day is not fun, and that I'd love for someone with an IQ higher than a rodent please ask a researcher or go to the clinic in san diego and ask about these things. It's not that complicated. And whoever was talking about the placebo effect, yes of course it can play a part, but they use placebos in trials! The side effect profile, which included headaches and drowsiness was incredible much higher than that for the placebo group, and is consistent with what people experience of well known antihistamines. Ask any dermatologist why people don't love to take zyrtec for years on end. It makes you tired and useless, and if you take it long enough, your body freaks out. I believe, from past trials, and from similarities in action, that this has the potential to do the same. Again, I believe it should be looked into before people start putting all their hopes on this being a more realistic drug to take than propecia.
Secondly, where did they say that they would be using a novel delivery technique? I cnt find that anywhere, and in their shareholders presentation they clearly say it will be an oral drug.
Kythera Acquires Rights to PGD2 Blocking Setipriprant for New Hair Loss Treatment
Collapse
X
-
Oh, I see what you're saying. Yes, I agree with you. It would be quite the conflict of interest for Cotsarelis to go into business with another company going after MPB. I imagine Puretech ventures would have quite a bit to say about that. Unless of course, they're involved.Leave a comment:
-
-
Who cares dude... you're about to get what looks to be a solid treatment against hair loss. If they keep moaning, it's not going to take away the hair you get backPeople have been hurling insults at me. I've tried to answer questions and express my excitement through facts, and nothing more. I have read everything that has to do with everything about PGD2 and its relation to hair loss. I think most people are uninformed and don't want to accept any of what I'm saying because 1. they're used to bad news. 2. They want to read a fancy news piece, then they'll accept it.
I'm trying to educate people on why this is the most promising treatment to come, but they want to ask uninformed questions, and not read up on the material themselves. I'm trying to spread positivity, and I'm being told that I don't know how to use logic, or that my reading comprehension is on a high school level.
Leave a comment:
-
People have been hurling insults at me. I've tried to answer questions and express my excitement through facts, and nothing more. I have read everything that has to do with everything about PGD2 and its relation to hair loss. I think most people are uninformed and don't want to accept any of what I'm saying because 1. they're used to bad news. 2. They want to read a fancy news piece, then they'll accept it.Propecia affects your DHT levels. PGD2 inhibition would be an entirely different case.
You are rather narrow-minded at times, 2014. All he has done is ask some viable questions about the drug. You don't need to be so utterly defensive about it. If you'd have continued reading his post rather than bolding the aforementioned sentences and reacting defensively towards them you'd have realized that he is as excited and hopeful for this treatment as you.
Try and be more courteous to others. Being bald may be bad, but being rude is simply awful.
I'm trying to educate people on why this is the most promising treatment to come, but they want to ask uninformed questions, and not read up on the material themselves. I'm trying to spread positivity, and I'm being told that I don't know how to use logic, or that my reading comprehension is on a high school level.Leave a comment:
-
What I want to know is how does any of this square with Costarelis's bizarre comments to Desmond at last year's hair loss conference in South Korea. From what I recall, Costarelis was aloof and seemed reluctant to engage or answer any questions, but at the same time was not above pleading for money.Leave a comment:
-
Propecia affects your DHT levels. PGD2 inhibition would be an entirely different case.
You are rather narrow-minded at times, 2014. All he has done is ask some viable questions about the drug. You don't need to be so utterly defensive about it. If you'd have continued reading his post rather than bolding the aforementioned sentences and reacting defensively towards them you'd have realized that he is as excited and hopeful for this treatment as you.
Try and be more courteous to others. Being bald may be bad, but being rude is simply awful.Leave a comment:
-
If this truly ends up being an oral drug (if it ever even comes out), i sure as **** wont be taking it as i've learned my lesson from Propecia.Leave a comment:
-
-
Let me rephrase that sentence so it makes more sense. Maybe if your reading comprehension was beyond a high school level, you could communicate more effectively.Seriously? DMSO doesn't doesn't deliver the drug to the scalp? And yes, ramatroban and setipiprant are both PGD2 inhibitors. Do you not know the meaning of the word similar?
Maybe if you had a reading comprehension beyond a high school level you could actually understand what people are saying.
Ugh, you ugly little internet troll.Leave a comment:
-
-
Seriously? DMSO doesn't doesn't deliver the drug to the scalp? And yes, ramatroban and setipiprant are both PGD2 inhibitors. Do you not know the meaning of the word similar?Ok, you don't understand the difference between rubbing a drug on your head by itself and what rogaine does. Rogaine has a vehicle to deliver the drug to the scalp.
Plus you said people have tried similar treatments to setipiprant with little success, and then you mentioned ramatroban as one of those drugs. Learn how to write and use logic, please.
Maybe if you had a reading comprehension beyond a high school level you could actually understand what people are saying.
I don't even know why you're arguing with me. Clearly I believe in this avenue of treatment as well, or I wouldn't be experimenting with it myself.Leave a comment:
-
I have read the studies. A topical treatment isn't "novel". Minoxidil is topical.No, I do know. A "novel delivery approach" could easily be a topical treatment that Cotsarelis mentioned year after year in his interviews about PGD2. The wounding protocol is distinctly used to create new hairs, not keep or strengthen the ones you already have. Please go read the studies.
Furthermore, you can find Cotsarelis's presentation at the World Congress for Hair research on Follica's website. That entire talk is about PGD2. He even explicitly mentions that a PGD2 antagonist type drug could be therapeutically beneficial. At the time he gave the presentation and Follica added it to their website, he was already under contract with Kythera. So, I'm not saying that it's the case for sure, but, there is ample reason to speculate that this very well could end up being used in conjunction with wounding.Leave a comment:
-
Yeah, I don't get where people are claiming this is going to be an oral treatment.
There's big chances the "novel delivery" has something to do with wounding, Cotsareli's has been obsessed with wounding for over a decade.
Probably why Follica seems to be reacting so well to the newsLeave a comment:
Leave a comment: