piloxll:new israeli method combines wounding+ zi/cu ions to destroy dht in the scalp

[Parsia]

You seem to be both delusional and have extreme shite reading comprehension skills.

I never had emotional attachment to dermarolling. To put salt on your wound, I've been dermarolling since August with marginal or no results at all so far. If you saw any of my replies recently over at ***, you would have noticed that I was OPEN to criticisms of dermarolling if only to iron out all the details and/or improve or prove efficacy. So there goes your ridiculous argument.... right out the window.

In regards to you AGAIN feeding people bullshit about me lying about the Russian site, lol.. my god, you clearly are a child. I never lied about anything because I havent looked at the russian site... I've dismissed it as irrelevant and have never made comments nor have any to make now other than what my previous statement that its separate from PiloxII (this is whats been said in the private forums). You're coming after me when I'm merely repeating what others have said as if my word is scripture.

Just out of curiousity... what is your IQ level?

I have really read many posts of hellouser and I think its so unfair that you think he has emotional feeling for dermarolling ! He started to talk in a thread about is derma really useful or not? I have never seen his effort to make a prove about it . its not good to judge without having enough information , I also think he and me tries to be positive about something which can help, I can also understand you wanna get the result with finding
the clues. He and another person mentioned which photos could not be a photoshop ( and both work in this area for 10 years) , So if we can confirm the photo's are real it can make us to think about the scam issue twice !

[JJJJrS]

The Russian site and PiloxII are separate entities AFAIK.

Not quite. That Yoram guy seems to be the main person associated with both. Perhaps the "product" is not the same but the person is.

And the most important part:

The connections are important to uncover if Pilox is a scam or not. The russian site also has amazing pictures, what do you think about them then? A guy in the private forum chat found they seem to be taken in the same place the hairdresser pics were taken

This is a very important point. It's well known that the Russian site is a scam.

Put two and two together, and it should raise red flags for anyone who actually has hopes about this.

[Sogeking]

My perspective: when it goes out and if it goes out, I will know if it works or not. If it doesn't work they will obviously not get a cent from me. So I won't lose anything.
To all of those who would have given some money or hope into this and would turn out to be fake, I would offer my thanks and sympathies.

[hellouser]

I dont know why you enter in discussions with bigentries hellouser, you just want something that works for your hair like everyone else on here, so stop debating, thats a no way!!

So people in the private forum are directly chatting with yoram or the two forum members into trials?
SO why dont you translate to this forum the info that they are giving there?
I cant explain myself why im seeing that is a ****ing SCAM cause my english is quite bad. Again like Nigams, some people like to play with our dreams

I don't want to be meddling with info from the private forums being posted here as I've noticed a LOT of people have been banned here for less than that. I'd rather not risk it.

[cotto]

I dont know why you enter in discussions with bigentries hellouser, you just want something that works for your hair like everyone else on here, so stop debating, thats a no way!!

So people in the private forum are directly chatting with yoram or the two forum members into trials?
SO why dont you translate to this forum the info that they are giving there?
I cant explain myself why im seeing that is a ****ing SCAM cause my english is quite bad. Again like Nigams, some people like to play with our dreams

[Thinning87]

Wow people get a life. Spend less time on this forum

[deuce]

Weren't a couple of guys in trials on the forum? I think we can just shut up until we hear from them. We need to just chill.

[hellouser]

Lol, strawman

OK, you've never seen the site, even when you replied about it in December at ***, but you are not lying. You just decided to dismiss it, on what grounds?

Have you seen the pics in the russian site? have you read the chat in the private forum where the pics were discussed?
Talk about selective reading

It's impossible to reason with you, it's easy to see you already decided Pilox is legit and you'll defend it until the hype starts to fade like you are doing with the dermarolling.

IQ under 90? Probably.

I dismissed the Russian site because:

1) I dont care for things outside of PiloxII and am going by what others have said that the two being unrelated.

2) I'm not sure if I saw the right site, but remember seeing something that looked like was designed in the 90s and spent less than 15 seconds on it.

3) I do remember seeing a site with mangled characters and dismissed that early too.

I DONT remember if it was the site everyone is talking about.

Now, this will probably be too difficult for you to understand (like most things) but I have a life outside of the forums, for example, a full time job, freelance work and sometimes a social life... so take this into consideration: There's too much information on all topics in regards to hair loss news, treatments, experimentals, future advancements, etc. There's only SO MUCH I can take in and only so much I can remember. You wanna pin me for something? You can find me guilty on that. So YES, I do have selective reading. However, this is clearly a case of the pot calling the kettle back...

Remember this gem of yours?

I'm going to assume you're NOT trolling with these questions, so I'll give you a serious answer (the questions are pretty laughable for people in my industry and actually borderline insult). But I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume your ignorance on the matter (no offense).

At my current job I am more or less the digital product manager. I fill a lot of roles for my position, anything from front end/back end development in HTML, CSS, Javascript, to video producting, editing in After Effects, studio photography, print materials, as well as design and illustration across the entire Adobe Creative Suite. I've got about 14 years under my belt, 3 years of college for design and my last three years in highschool focusing lots on fine art, media arts and communications technology, winning a number of awards in young talent competitions across, going as far being top 10 in my province. It's taken an incredible number of projects to get to where I am, and yes, a lot of it has included professional photography along with colour correction and photo editing both with Lightroom and Photoshop. I've posted a number of times on proper photography here in the forums, both in terms of subject lighting and camera settings. These things WILL affect how a photograph can be manipulated, there are a number of variables and its typically whats in focus and how much of an area you have to play with. Images with a strong bokeh (google the term) with a quick focus fall off will limit what you can do. But this is just ONE variable. Again, 10+ years in the industry, I can tell. I edit photographs all the time; colour corrections, cropping, removing blemishes, removing text, etc. I enjoy my field... a lot. I love everything that has to do with digital media, this is as much of a hobby as it is a job for me.

So, questioning my expertise with Photoshop after investing so much time in my field and helping people here with photography is a slap to the face

So you are basically a webdesigner, you sounded like a professional photographer by the way you talk about manipulation. Try harder next time

I made it perfectly clear to you that I work in digital media as well as print and you came to the conclusion that I'm a web developer?

Selective reading my ass....

[bigentries]

You seem to be both delusional and have extreme shite reading comprehension skills.

I never had emotional attachment to dermarolling. To put salt on your wound, I've been dermarolling since August with marginal or no results at all so far. If you saw any of my replies recently over at ***, you would have noticed that I was OPEN to criticisms of dermarolling if only to iron out all the details and/or improve or prove efficacy. So there goes your ridiculous argument.... right out the window.

In regards to you AGAIN feeding people bullshit about me lying about the Russian site, lol.. my god, you clearly are a child. I never lied about anything because I havent looked at the russian site... I've dismissed it as irrelevant and have never made comments nor have any to make now other than what my previous statement that its separate from PiloxII (this is whats been said in the private forums). You're coming after me when I'm merely repeating what others have said as if my word is scripture.

Just out of curiousity... what is your IQ level?

Lol, strawman

OK, you've never seen the site, even when you replied about it in December at ***, but you are not lying. You just decided to dismiss it, on what grounds?

Have you seen the pics in the russian site? have you read the chat in the private forum where the pics were discussed?
Talk about selective reading

It's impossible to reason with you, it's easy to see you already decided Pilox is legit and you'll defend it until the hype starts to fade like you are doing with the dermarolling.

[hellouser]

That's why I think you have developed an emotional attachment as you did with the dermarolling, why wouldn't you worry about the connections then?
You also lied about not knowing about the russian site, why did you do it?

The connections are important to uncover if Pilox is a scam or not. The russian site also has amazing pictures, what do you think about them then? A guy in the private forum chat found they seem to be taken in the same place the hairdresser pics were taken

You seem to be both delusional and have extreme shite reading comprehension skills.

I never had emotional attachment to dermarolling. To put salt on your wound, I've been dermarolling since August with marginal or no results at all so far. If you saw any of my replies recently over at ***, you would have noticed that I was OPEN to criticisms of dermarolling if only to iron out all the details and/or improve or prove efficacy. So there goes your ridiculous argument.... right out the window.

In regards to you AGAIN feeding people bullshit about me lying about the Russian site, lol.. my god, you clearly are a child. I never lied about anything because I havent looked at the russian site... I've dismissed it as irrelevant and have never made comments nor have any to make now other than what my previous statement that its separate from PiloxII (this is whats been said in the private forums). You're coming after me when I'm merely repeating what others have said as if my word is scripture.

Just out of curiousity... what is your IQ level?

[bigentries]

AGAIN: quit speaking on my behalf.

I'm not worried. Why the hell would I be? Do I have anything to gain or lose? I don't care about any of the connections. I'm *only* interested in the efficacy of PiloxII. I haven't even taken part much in the discussions about it. My only praise for it is in regards to the stellar photography shown in the before/after pictures.

That's why I think you have developed an emotional attachment as you did with the dermarolling, why wouldn't you worry about the connections then?
You also lied about not knowing about the russian site, why did you do it?

The connections are important to uncover if Pilox is a scam or not. The russian site also has amazing pictures, what do you think about them then? A guy in the private forum chat found they seem to be taken in the same place the hairdresser pics were taken

[greatjob!]

Well, you claimed you had never seen the russian thing before, even when you replied about it in *** in December, and now you are too worried about people talking about it.

If you don't have problem with skepticism, just let it flow

Be careful bro he'll put you on his ignore list....Lol

[hellouser]

Well, you claimed you had never seen the russian thing before, even when you replied about it in *** in December, and now you are too worried about people talking about it.

If you don't have problem with skepticism, just let it flow

AGAIN: quit speaking on my behalf.

I'm not worried. Why the hell would I be? Do I have anything to gain or lose? I don't care about any of the connections. I'm *only* interested in the efficacy of PiloxII. I haven't even taken part much in the discussions about it. My only praise for it is in regards to the stellar photography shown in the before/after pictures.

[bigentries]

Jesus christ dude, this is like the 4th time I'm going to tell you... get this through your thick skull:

I HAVE NO EMOTIONAL ATTACHMENT TO PILOXII.

I've been keeping my eye on it, yes. So have you. Does that mean you're emotionally attached to it as well?

My god.

Well, you claimed you had never seen the russian thing before, even when you replied about it in *** in December, and now you are too worried about people talking about it.

If you don't have problem with skepticism, just let it flow

[hellouser]

No one is saying they are the same thing hellouser

However, there is a connection, and what Yoram was describing in the private forum sounds very similar to the Russian treatment

If you don't have any trouble with the connection, fine. But a lot of us are worried that a guy that is promoting snake oil is also claiming to have a legit treatment

You really need to detach emotionally from Piloxx, it is obvious you don't like any skepticism from things you decided are truth, remember the dermarolling and semen debacle.

Jesus christ dude, this is like the 4th time I'm going to tell you... get this through your thick skull:

I HAVE NO EMOTIONAL ATTACHMENT TO PILOXII.

I've been keeping my eye on it, yes. So have you. Does that mean you're emotionally attached to it as well?

Hop off my nuts already, you're constantly speaking on my behalf. WHY?