So how close are we to a new 'cure'

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • BaldAndHairy
    replied
    Originally posted by hellouser
    Nothing. Some asshat by the name of Cotsarelis throughout his typical bullsh*t response of 'within 2 years' as if it were an attempt to bring more media attention to himself.

    Liars, the whole f*cking lot of them.
    That's pretty sad. Dr. Cotsarelis is a widely published medical scientist. People don't go into it for fame or money. And he's working for you.

    Like, imagine a kid with cancer saying "f!@# my doctors, they can't help me out anymore. God damn them"

    Grow up.

    Leave a comment:


  • Tomb10
    replied
    when you've got dupa..
    will a new possible cure than also work for these hairloss sufferers..?

    Leave a comment:


  • Javert
    replied
    ^ This.

    Leave a comment:


  • sausage
    replied
    If anyone finds a cure I'd happily be your personal slave for a year.

    Leave a comment:


  • greatjob!
    replied
    Originally posted by VictimOfDHT
    Can you say SHEEPLE, sheeple?
    Well I guess if following science, evidence, and concrete facts makes me a sheep, then Baaaaa Baaaaa!

    Leave a comment:


  • VictimOfDHT
    replied
    Originally posted by greatjob!
    You obviously have not a clue in hell about the difference between climate and weather. Ignorance like yours is the reason the energy industry has been able to create false doubt on climate science.

    Can you say SHEEPLE, sheeple?

    Leave a comment:


  • hiilikeyourbeard
    replied
    Originally posted by Thinning87
    I agree - let's stick to the original topic, shall we?
    better commercial treatment, maybe 5 years

    Leave a comment:


  • Thinning87
    replied
    Originally posted by greatjob!
    You obviously have not a clue in hell about the difference between climate and weather. Ignorance like yours is the reason the energy industry has been able to create false doubt on climate science.
    I agree - let's stick to the original topic, shall we?

    Leave a comment:


  • TheSwingingGate
    replied
    I would like to add, as someone who has returned to the academic world, it can be a bubble. Des, your professor might not think MPB is a big deal - but sometimes profs live in a "la-la" land anyway!

    Leave a comment:


  • greatjob!
    replied
    Originally posted by UK_
    The best scam has to be "climate change".

    I dont know about you, but the climate has always been changing, it was raining and windy yesterday, it's sunny and mild today. I dont believe it, I never will, it's all garbage and bullshit.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C7SwA1ENqxI
    You obviously have not a clue in hell about the difference between climate and weather. Ignorance like yours is the reason the energy industry has been able to create false doubt on climate science.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pentarou
    replied
    Originally posted by Desmond84
    I think we should all be advocates for change BOTH in the hair loss industry and in the academic arena!
    100% agreement.

    Des, I know what you mean about the frustration of hearing your professor say that baldness is inevitable and unfightable - that's unfortunately just the social norm of 'acceptance', in other words, defeatism. And it's not even based completely in reality, as people who have successfully used the Big 3 and/or Dut can verify, AGA hair loss is certainly treatable, if only to some degree. It wasn't always treatable of course, just as diabetes or asthma or cancer weren't treatable 200 years ago, but advances in medical treatments happened. Maybe AGA won't be cured in our lifetimes, but there's certainly the chance of new treatments making this disease far more fightable, and thus our lives far more tolerable and enjoyable.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pentarou
    replied
    ^ now that's anti-intellectualism.

    Leave a comment:


  • UK_
    replied
    Originally posted by walrus
    Just a theory like gravity and evolution, right?
    Yes, along with Christianity, Judaism, Hinduism... Santa Claus & the tooth fairy

    The difference is the degree of probability in something being correct vs something being incorrect, climate change is common sense, in the 80's there were reports of 'global cooling', the past 3 winters in Britain have been the longest in the past 30 years, last year winter stretched from mid-September to early March.

    I can't see any 'climate change' or global warming, also, there were foundations back in the 60's that stated they would invent a 'common threat' to unite the people of earth (nation states), they actually stated that issues surrounding the environment and climate would "fit the bill".

    You're being conned.

    Leave a comment:


  • walrus
    replied
    Originally posted by UK_
    ^^^^Oh you can bet your ass it's a theory and nothing more. Lol thank you for agreeing with me.

    Have a nice day.

    And even if somehow you did harbour every drop of scientific wisdom known to man about how the climate works, you probably wouldnt even come close to understanding a percentile of how the earths climate really works. You're just human, having access to google scholar and first world education doesnt make you God.
    Just a theory like gravity and evolution, right?

    Leave a comment:


  • UK_
    replied
    ^^^^Oh you can bet your ass it's a theory and nothing more. Lol thank you for agreeing with me.

    Have a nice day.

    And even if somehow you did harbour every drop of scientific wisdom known to man about how the climate works, you probably wouldnt even come close to understanding a percentile of how the earths climate really works. You're just human, having access to google scholar and first world education doesnt make you God.

    Leave a comment:

Working...