7th World Congress for Hair Research (2013)

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • stayhopeful
    replied
    Originally posted by jman91
    spencers tone in the show yesterday says it all, there most likely won't be anything too exiting being revealed in the 2013 Edinburgh conference
    What did he say??

    Leave a comment:


  • jman91
    replied
    spencers tone in the show yesterday says it all, there most likely won't be anything too exiting being revealed in the 2013 Edinburgh conference

    Leave a comment:


  • hellouser
    replied
    I got a better idea; start a campaign on the boycott of Finasteride. Merck is heavily responsible for the lack of treatments, for 20 years men have used this piece of shit drug without pushing for a PROPER solution.

    Leave a comment:


  • Desmond84
    replied
    Hey guys,

    Sorry for confusing everyone and getting everyone down but what I was saying was Dr Jahoda started working on DP cells back in 1980's. The study I posted is what they did in 2013 NOT 30 years ago! It's state of the art technology! It wasa published only a few weeks ago and he's presenting it for the first time at the Hair Research Congress!

    P.S. If Aderans is smart, they might ask him to join their team and do a quick Phase 2 trial with this technique to see what are the outcomes! If so, 2016 release would still be a possibility!

    Leave a comment:


  • StayThick
    replied
    On the money as usual Hellouser. Agree 100% with your comments.

    Leave a comment:


  • hellouser
    replied
    Originally posted by DepressedByHairLoss
    Believe me dude, this sh*t pisses me off more than anything. There are so many aspects of the hair loss industry that I really just cannot stand. Like why all of these scientists test on mice until the cows come home yet never do anything to regrow hair on humans. Or why all of the hair transplant doctors perform only hair transplants (and make ridiculous amounts of money) and don't do a damn thing to innovate and create better options. Or why a form of hair cloning has already been achieved yet no one acknowledges it or does anything to try to duplicate her procedure and results. Check out this article: http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?p...d=a6OdEa5VFNV8.

    Personally, I have no choice other than to be optimistic about new treatments like Histogen, Aderans, or Replicel because I just don't even want to fathom liviing the rest of my life with hair loss. And hell, I'd even bet that there are other treatments that could really help to regrow hair (an I mean simple autologous treatments) yet they are not being explored because people are making too much money off of today's current limited treatments.
    That article you posted was 4 years ago. FOUR. Another disappointment. I think society gets too much of a kick out of balding men to let them even the playing field. And thats still nothing compared to the infinite stream of money the scumbags behind merck and other cosmetics shills are sucking out of every desperate man.

    We should try to take advantage of something like http://www.medstartr.com/

    30 fvcking years without a legit treatment. What a god damn failure society is, and more so for continually mocking bald men. I can't believe we spend an overwhelming amount of money on taxes for military, funding assholes to become hired assassins and blow the fvck out of little brown kids in nations we dont belong in, but when it comes to HEALTH.... the only advancemenets we've made are fvcking PILLS that only KEEP us sick.

    Disgusting.

    Leave a comment:


  • DepressedByHairLoss
    replied
    Originally posted by hellouser
    But thats just letting everything slide, I mean, today we learn we've had the ability to work on a legitimate cure THIRTY YEARS AGO? And we're STILL being stringed along?

    We've got every reason to be negative about it. Thirty years? That is disgusting.

    However, rather than complain, I'd force the powers that be to release a treatment that a) works b) doesnt cause your dick to go permanently limp

    Thirty years??? Seriously, to brush it off and continue to go on with future developments with a smile is pretty fvcking naive.
    Believe me dude, this sh*t pisses me off more than anything. There are so many aspects of the hair loss industry that I really just cannot stand. Like why all of these scientists test on mice until the cows come home yet never do anything to regrow hair on humans. Or why all of the hair transplant doctors perform only hair transplants (and make ridiculous amounts of money) and don't do a damn thing to innovate and create better options. Or why a form of hair cloning has already been achieved yet no one acknowledges it or does anything to try to duplicate her procedure and results. Check out this article: http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?p...d=a6OdEa5VFNV8.

    Personally, I have no choice other than to be optimistic about new treatments like Histogen, Aderans, or Replicel because I just don't even want to fathom liviing the rest of my life with hair loss. And hell, I'd even bet that there are other treatments that could really help to regrow hair (an I mean simple autologous treatments) yet they are not being explored because people are making too much money off of today's current limited treatments.

    Leave a comment:


  • szn
    replied
    if nothing has been presented yet and we do not technically know anything, then why is everyone getting bent out of shape? There is still a possibility of good news..

    Leave a comment:


  • hellouser
    replied
    Originally posted by Conpecia
    how bad is your hairloss man? age? seems like you are the most affected by baldness out of all of us.
    I'm about an NW3. But thats not important, as my aggressive attitude towards a legitimate solution benefits everyone from NW1-NW7, im not just looking out for myself.

    Leave a comment:


  • Conpecia
    replied
    Originally posted by hellouser
    Someone at Edinburgh needs to seriously address this issue, stand up and ask:

    'What good are all these findings if NONE of you have made any of this as a viable treatment for the past 30 years?'
    how bad is your hairloss man? age? seems like you are the most affected by baldness out of all of us.

    Leave a comment:


  • hellouser
    replied
    Originally posted by Thinning87
    ok we all agree but relax dude - let's see what will be said in Edinburgh
    Someone at Edinburgh needs to seriously address this issue, stand up and ask:

    'What good are all these findings if NONE of you have made any of this as a viable treatment for the past 30 years?'

    Leave a comment:


  • Conpecia
    replied
    Originally posted by szn
    so maybe i have not been paying attention, but what is going on? will something not be available in 2015?
    most likely not I'm afraid, not from one of these companies. but let's just wait a couple weeks and we'll know a lot more. no sense in speculating at this point. just don't get your hopes up if you're like me and bad news deflates you.

    Leave a comment:


  • PatientlyWaiting
    replied
    Originally posted by szn
    so maybe i have not been paying attention, but what is going on? will something not be available in 2015?
    Nope.

    But good news, something to be optimistic about, we will all be sexy 40 year old's with NW0 hairlines. All the ladies will be flocking over us. Some of us could even get together and make a oldman-boy band. We could make this work guys, 2025, we'll be set.

    Leave a comment:


  • Thinning87
    replied
    Originally posted by hellouser
    But thats just letting everything slide, I mean, today we learn we've had the ability to work on a legitimate cure THIRTY YEARS AGO? And we're STILL being stringed along?

    We've got every reason to be negative about it. Thirty years? That is disgusting.

    However, rather than complain, I'd force the powers that be to release a treatment that a) works b) doesnt cause your dick to go permanently limp

    Thirty years??? Seriously, to brush it off and continue to go on with future developments with a smile is pretty fvcking naive.
    ok we all agree but relax dude - let's see what will be said in Edinburgh

    Leave a comment:


  • hellouser
    replied
    Originally posted by DepressedByHairLoss
    I know, you're totally right. No wonder Spencer says to take what people say on these forums with a grain of salt, because of all the extreme negativity that goes on here.
    But thats just letting everything slide, I mean, today we learn we've had the ability to work on a legitimate cure THIRTY YEARS AGO? And we're STILL being stringed along?

    We've got every reason to be negative about it. Thirty years? That is disgusting.

    However, rather than complain, I'd force the powers that be to release a treatment that a) works b) doesnt cause your dick to go permanently limp

    Thirty years??? Seriously, to brush it off and continue to go on with future developments with a smile is pretty fvcking naive.

    Leave a comment:

Working...