50 grafts patch test in Vitro Hair Doubling as requested by GC @Dr. Nigam's

[Arashi]

arashi you are pain in the ass.

Now then tell me Didi, why don't YOU go RIGHT NOW and get your procedure done ? Really, tell me ! If this is all the 'proof' YOU need, then what are you waiting for ?

[didi]

arashi
you are pain in the ass.

dr nigam is doing the best he can with patients he got..

ok you can send him 5 independent/uncorrupted people from holland and he will do test for free...
in meantime sit back and enjoy

[Arashi]

jjjr,
I have posted daily video's with news paper

I only watched your first video and saw you didn't comb the area below the extraction site. But even if you did: if you took 15 grafts divided all over the donor area and put a little of that pimple-hiding make-up over the extraction sites, then there's no way it would show visible on your video. Resolution is way too low and you're not close enough with the camera.

Fact is, you need an independent patient for us to believe you.

[drnigams]

jjjr,
I have posted daily video's with news paper showing the date ,showing clear scalp all over with comb over.
How can you get 50 plus follicles(donor plus recipient) from 15 grafts with 23 follicles in all.Even transection can't give that.Plus clear video daily showing no other mark on any part of scalp with clear combing over video to see through every part of scalp.
If stemcells,dp cells can't even do this than why are all of us including aderans,tsuji,gerd ,jahoda talikg about regenerative potential of stemcells and dp cells and why do regen companies make growth factors for,if they can't regenerate...
But for our dear friend arashi, there is lot more to come including documented work on forum members,
Dear arashi one member just now enrolled for the procedure from my favorite country netherland..may be he can satisfy you...

I understand that and I never said this was proof that his procedure works. They could be transections for all we know. This is why I asked drnigams to continue to provide us donor and recipient photos.

But the quality of the documentation from Nigam has improved dramatically and he's very open to suggestions online. I'm always skeptical of course. I was very dismissive earlier but I'm willing to give him the benefit of doubt for now and we'll see what he can show us.

[Arashi]

Again Dr Nigams, I want to make it clear that I'm not here to bash you. I can easily forgive the things that happened in the past with the photoshopping and for all I know, what you said might be true (that you didn't know anything about it, although I must say I DO find it a bit hard to believe, but ok).

I'm just saying we need SOLID proof in order to take your technique seriously.

[drnigams]

It was on a lighter note arashi as was your skepticism...

[Arashi]

I understand that and I never said this was proof that his procedure works. They could be transections for all we know. This is why I asked drnigams to continue to provide us donor and recipient photos.

But the quality of the documentation from Nigam has improved dramatically and he's very open to suggestions online. I'm always skeptical of course. I was very dismissive earlier but I'm willing to give him the benefit of doubt for now and we'll see what he can show us.

Agreed, his photo's surely improve. Now if he can provide us photo's of independent patients, THEN it will start to get interesting.

[JJJJrS]

Come on JJJJrS, I had expected a bit more skepticism from your part. Surely the photo's show us growth but for all we know, Nigams didn't even touch the grafts at all.

I understand that and I never said this was proof that his procedure works. They could be transections for all we know. This is why I asked drnigams to continue to provide us donor and recipient photos.

But the quality of the documentation from Nigam has improved dramatically and he's very open to suggestions online. I'm always skeptical of course. I was very dismissive earlier but I'm willing to give him the benefit of doubt for now and we'll see what he can show us.

[Arashi]

"Just take a look at gc83uk's recipient. Sure we don't know an exact number but here's a hell of a lot new hair there, can't deny that"

its a very weak argument,we need to count it, I requested pictures but everyone seems to be happy ignoring it...most important part.
we analized dono area 169 times by now but i was the only one to go for recipient and I found hair per grafts to be 1.35 way bellow advertised 2.5!!......now it would be good to know how many hairs grow in hst1 and 2.

gc83uk, can you supply Didi with photo's of your recipient ? If he wants to count them, that should be interesting.

[Arashi]

That's a good one arashi...but than where did the follicles come from at the recipient which is near slick bald,with daily videos with news paper with date showing clear scalp.

You only did 15 grafts, it's VERY easy to hide 15 extraction points, divided all over the donor, under all that hair.

A new disease has to be listed with World health organisation called
' Arashi's hair regrowth phobia '

I must say you behave very weirdly for someone we're supposed to trust.

[didi]

"Just take a look at gc83uk's recipient. Sure we don't know an exact number but here's a hell of a lot new hair there, can't deny that"

its a very weak argument,we need to count it, I requested pictures but everyone seems to be happy ignoring it...most important part.
we analized dono area 169 times by now but i was the only one to go for recipient and I found hair per grafts to be 1.35 way bellow advertised 2.5!!......now it would be good to know how many hairs grow in hst1 and 2.

[drnigams]

That's a good one arashi...but than where did the follicles come from at the recipient which is near slick bald,with daily videos with news paper with date showing clear scalp.
By the way have you not noticed we took in total 23 follicles(8 singles,6 doubles and 1 triplet) from the donor and bisected into two.
So we should have not more than that in total at donor and recipient combine as per your day dreaming skepticism .
But sadly for you, we already got 30 plus follicles in donor itself and count how many at recipient tomorrow.
As per you the independent member colleague showed 8 out 9 grafts regenerating as doubles , verified by all, should also be viewed as suspicion.
A new disease has to be listed with World health organisation called
' Arashi's hair regrowth phobia '

[Arashi]

arashi

you really think dr nigam is just bored rich man who wanna waste his time and money

Like explained, if you can trick 125 people to come your clinic, you've made a million USD, enough by Indian standards to retire. After all the photoshopping and lies I'm just extremely skeptical, I think any rational person should be just that.

when you analized GCs donor you were jumping in the air when you saw hair growing from extraction sites...whn dr nigam produces the same you seem unmoved.

Yep. And if doctor Nigams had performed his procedure on an independent patien, like gc83uk, I'd be 'jumping in the air' as well if he'd show those results. Instead, he performed it on a staff member which gave him tons of possibilities to cheat.

do we see hair growing from sites? yes.it means donor is regenerating.HST recipient was never tested and you endorsed it, just like IM

Just take a look at gc83uk's recipient. Sure we don't know an exact number but here's a hell of a lot new hair there, can't deny that.

[didi]

arashi

you really think dr nigam is just bored rich man who wanna waste his time and money


when you analized GCs donor you were jumping in the air when you saw hair growing from extraction sites...whn dr nigam produces the same you seem unmoved.
do we see hair growing from sites? yes.it means donor is regenerating.HST recipient was never tested and you endorsed it, just like IM

[Arashi]

These are some interesting photos drnigams. It definitely seems that the hairs are regenerating from the extractions.

Please continue to update us with your results, particularly in the the recipient area.

Come on JJJJrS, I had expected a bit more skepticism from your part. Surely the photo's show us growth but for all we know, Nigams didn't even touch the grafts at all.