50 grafts patch test in Vitro Hair Doubling as requested by GC @Dr. Nigam's

[534623]

I agree, IronMan needs to be banned...

He needs more respect from hairloss losers like Ironman

Excuse me, but aren't you the guy "moopookoo" at HairSite...


... who has been one of the first who exposed Dr. Nigam as fraudster?

And are you the same person who now tries to lick this fraudsters ass,
just because you heard so much about his Mother Teresa hair transplant costs for losers who would sell their mother for some hairs?

[didi]

I think that's a good idea - as they did on HS and as I can see the outcome today:

Banning the knowledgeable guys and just leaving all the biggest jerks behind - yup, great idea and works great...

I agree, IronMan needs to be banned ,at least temporary for a month or 2 and then we will see if his behavior improves

in meantime IM can go to HRN site and try to promote HASCI, I wonder how long would he last on HRN


I beleive Dr Nigam is doing his best to help us and is the only Dr who is actually talking and listening to us

He needs more respect from hairloss losers like Ironman
he wouldnt be wasting his time and money if he doesnt beleive it might work

[534623]

Guys what do you say to open a thread where we ask to moderation a ban for Iron Man?

I think that's a good idea - as they did on HS and as I can see the outcome today:

Banning the knowledgeable guys and just leaving all the biggest jerks behind - yup, great idea and works great...

[One]

Guys what do you say to open a thread where we ask to moderation a ban for Iron Man? He's just a troll and he ruin any discussion with the dott.Nigam.

The facts say if Nigam will be a flop or not. It's useless to put too much pressure and do nerd troll.

[534623]

Dear Friends,

As requested by GC and few others at TBT presenting before picture taken today 28th March 2013, for 50 graft patch test for in Vitro donor doubling on this MPB case.

Excuse me, are you able to explain IN DETAIL what, exactly, are you going to do at all in this case?

1) How do you intend to extract the grafts in the donor area?
1a) With a rambo knife?
1b) With a cavitation laser machine?
1c) With a X-ray apparatus
1d) With a conventional "punch" - and if "yes" - which size?

2) In which way do you intend to "split" in vitro "the thing" you extracted from the patients' donor area?

3) How will "the thing" you intend to extract look like at all after extraction?

4) What exactly (4a) and in which way (4b) do you intend to implant into the patients' recipient area?

5) Are you able, for example, ...

http://www.fileden.com/files/2012/3/15/3278666/Upper-Strip-Area-Day-3.jpg

... to take such a photo from the patients' donor area so that viewers are also able to see what's going on BEYOND the tattooed area?

[drnigams]

50 grafts patch test in Vitro Hair Doubling as requested by GC @Dr. Nigam's

Dear Friends,

As requested by GC and few others at TBT presenting before picture taken today 28th March 2013, for 50 graft patch test for in Vitro donor doubling on this MPB case. GC has also requested the same from HST and want to compare the two technique regarding the donor and recipient regeneration.

Any other modification required in this case study, feel free to communicate to me.

Hope GC will do the independent documentation and digital follow up of donor and recipient growth.

Below are the before pictures for tomorrows 50 grafts patch test including one short video. 6 tattoos have been made on the recipient and 6 tattoos have been made on the donor shaved scalp.

As requested by GC and others we will take out mostly triplets and double grafts.

Tomorrow i.e., 29th March 2013, we will post the Day 0 pictures.































For large images follow the below URL :-

http://www.drnigams.net/images/rtn/large/01.jpg

http://www.drnigams.net/images/rtn/large/02.jpg

http://www.drnigams.net/images/rtn/large/03.jpg

http://www.drnigams.net/images/rtn/large/04.jpg

http://www.drnigams.net/images/rtn/large/05.jpg

http://www.drnigams.net/images/rtn/large/06.jpg

http://www.drnigams.net/images/rtn/large/07.jpg

http://www.drnigams.net/images/rtn/large/08.jpg

http://www.drnigams.net/images/rtn/large/09.jpg

http://www.drnigams.net/images/rtn/large/10.jpg

http://www.drnigams.net/images/rtn/large/11.jpg

http://www.drnigams.net/images/rtn/large/12.jpg

http://www.drnigams.net/images/rtn/large/13.jpg

http://www.drnigams.net/images/rtn/large/14.jpg

http://www.drnigams.net/images/rtn/large/15.jpg

Dear Friends,

As requested by GC and few others at TBT presenting before picture taken today 28th March 2013, for 50 graft patch test for in Vitro donor doubling on this MPB case. GC has also requested the same from HST and want to compare the two technique regarding the donor and recipient regeneration.

Any other modification required in this case study, feel free to communicate to me.

Hope GC will do the independent documentation and digital follow up of donor and recipient growth.

Below are the before pictures for tomorrows 50 grafts patch test including one short video. 6 tattoos have been made on the recipient and 6 tattoos have been made on the donor shaved scalp.

As requested by GC and others we will take out mostly triplets and double grafts.

Tomorrow i.e., 29th March 2013, we will post the Day 0 pictures.


Links for the pictures

http://www.drnigams.net/images/rtn/01.jpg

http://www.drnigams.net/images/rtn/02.jpg

http://www.drnigams.net/images/rtn/03.jpg

http://www.drnigams.net/images/rtn/04.jpg

http://www.drnigams.net/images/rtn/05.jpg

http://www.drnigams.net/images/rtn/06.jpg

http://www.drnigams.net/images/rtn/07.jpg

http://www.drnigams.net/images/rtn/08.jpg

http://www.drnigams.net/images/rtn/09.jpg

http://www.drnigams.net/images/rtn/10.jpg

http://www.drnigams.net/images/rtn/11.jpg

http://www.drnigams.net/images/rtn/12.jpg

http://www.drnigams.net/images/rtn/13.jpg

http://www.drnigams.net/images/rtn/14.jpg

http://www.drnigams.net/images/rtn/15.jpg

Video link

http://youtu.be/78QDCNGQ2lc

[Jasari]

Why a doctor actually communicating on an online community frustrates people has me confused. It should give us much better idea of the capabilities of HM & Donor Doubling regardless of whether the treatment is successful (unlikely) or not.

I don't think any rational balding person has a vested interest in who 'wins' the race to cure or significantly improve MPB - People just want it fixed (Whether that comes from Histogen, Gho or Batman - Who cares); and doctors being more available and transparent online only serves to help.

[534623]

I have a much better question for you:

Can your superb “shutter speeds, iso, aperture, depth of field or even *proper controlled off camera flash lighting*” knowledge help me and tell me …

Day 3 *FULL SIZE*

http://www.fileden.com/files/2012/3/15/3278666/Upper-Strip-Area-Day-3.jpg

Day 7 *FULL SIZE*

http://www.fileden.com/files/2012/3/15/3278666/Upper-Strip-Area-Day-7.jpg

… the percentage of donor regeneration in my HST treated occiput area?

No? Yes?
Can you see any hairs regrowing at all with such photos?
Or is it rather true...

http://www.baldtruthtalk.com/showthread.php?t=11858

... what individuals like "Dr" Nigam fraudulently claims?

[534623]

You know nothing of shutter speeds, iso, aperture, depth of field or even *proper controlled off camera flash lighting*

Take a seat ironman, for all your criticisms of everyone about basically everything, this is one area where I know for sure you know jack sh*t.

pfffffffft...should I?
Sorry, but did I mention anywhere that I'm an expert concerning "shutter speeds, iso, aperture, depth of field or even *proper controlled off camera flash lighting"??

What an idiot ...

What helps knowledge about "shutter speeds, iso, aperture, depth of field or even *proper controlled off camera flash lighting" when neither patients nor doctors are able to show us (but what I DID!) WHAT WE WANT TO SEE ??

Excuse me, but can you idiot explain me in detail, how your superb knowledge about "shutter speeds, iso, aperture, depth of field or even *proper controlled off camera flash lighting" can help me to see what I want to see in the end?
Thanks in advance.

[hellouser]

You're still a total amateur when it comes to photography and have zero knowledge about the technical side about photography. You just proved my point in that response too, you didn't mention anything relevant and only boasted about how you documented 'amazing' pictures. So what, because you have an amazing opinion of some pictures makes you an expert photographer? You know nothing of shutter speeds, iso, aperture, depth of field or even *proper controlled off camera flash lighting*

Take a seat ironman, for all your criticisms of everyone about basically everything, this is one area where I know for sure you know jack sh*t.

[534623]

I know youre a total noob when it comes to photography, so this is an area where you should keep quiet.

Excuse me, but are you the one,
who is able to make such photos with cheap digital cameras…

http://www.fileden.com/files/2012/3/15/3278666/Right-Ear-View-Day-3.jpg

… or even such a series of real close-up photos…

http://www.baldtruthtalk.com/showpost.php?p=96832&postcount=16

… or is it me?

And are you the one,
who documented the world’s 1st day-by-day donor hair regeneration process at all …



… or is it me?

Nobody, I mean really NOBODY on this planet has ever such photos and documentations concerning hair follicle regeneration! NOBODY!

So I think you or one of the other completely useless jerks in thread are definitely NOT the one who can tell ME, what are good or bad photos(-documentations) or who should rather be the one who should keep quiet.

AND, in addition, most guys, who have always been interested in such procedures – without me, they would still know A SHIT about anything at all! – just to let you psychiatric idiots know….

[25 going on 65]

How come 534623 is allowed to troll on this site continuously? Does this site have no moderator?

I have wondered this for awhile.

[The Alchemist]

How come 534623 is allowed to troll on this site continuously? Does this site have no moderator?

Just ignore him; he's nothing more than background noise.

Nice work Dr. Nigram, this is a good start and more than we've seen from any Dr. to date. Hopefully the follow up photos will be as thorough and of as high a quality as the initial set. Good luck!

[HARIRI]

Great pictures Dr. Nigam, we appreciate your patience and efforts in meeting the demands of the forum members. Looking forward to your results.

[JJJJrS]

Yeah, you're right - they look like $1000 super-duper high quality photos ...

The pictures are excellent.

For example, with this picture, if you click and zoom-in, you can count all the hairs very easily and see exactly how many hairs are in each unit.