NeedHairASAP

[gc83uk]

If your donor is limited and you have unlimited funds then Dr Gho is a no-brainer for most people I would think!

Imagine, after having a few thousand grafts with Dr Gho, if they say we can't increase your density any higher than what we have already done 50 per sq cm. But worry not because your donor is just as it was pretty much before you started with the Gho procedures. Therefore there is no reason why you couldn't continue your treatment with another Dr who is skilled at creating amazing hairlines or higher densities than 50 per sq cm.

I think everyone has different needs.

[534623]

Come on Ironman, lets be honest here. You have spent a lot of time bashing hair transplant doctors or whoever you could in order to make your point and to try to elevate Gho.

Come on Delphi,
could you please post links to at least some tiny pieces of this time I spent with "bashing hair transplant doctors"? Shouldn't be that difficult for you. I mean, if someone spends "a lot of time" with bashing someone - there must be a plenty of sources ...

Otherwise, users and I consider your claim just as another useless claim - at least, not honest.

Furthermore, do you consider this request also as "uncivilized"?

[aim4hair]

One aspect that I think deserves more credit from Gho's HST, and I think a repair patient like yourself should appreciate this, is the option to buzz down/shave your head. This is an option that is eliminated if you ever get a FUT or most FUE procedures. Most repair patients understand how valuable this is, although it's something a lot of inexperienced hair transplant patients neglect, because most assume their result will be great and remain great down the line. From all the cases we've seen documented online, it seems clear that the HST procedure is the least invasive and with practically no visible scarring.

I second that.. I had my first HST almost 2 months ago and while it's too early to tell about the final result, i shave to the bone now just like i used to do pre op with no signs of HT at all, so at least with HST if things go bad you dont get a permenant damage like most of other traditional HT methods where you lose the option of shaving... This is a very viable option for those young ppl with advanced cases or ppl who are not on meds.

[hairysituation]

I second that.. I had my first HST almost 2 months ago and while it's too early to tell about the final result, i shave to the bone now just like i used to do pre op with no signs of HT at all, so at least with HST if things go bad you dont get a permenant damage like most of other traditional HT methods where you lose the option of shaving... This is a very viable option for those young ppl with advanced cases or ppl who are not on meds.

Can you promise to post the final result, even if you are unsatisfied with the outcome? I can imagine it`s hard to do it, but it would really helps other consumers, and you will at least not have bad scarring.

Good luck to you!

[aim4hair]

Can you promise to post the final result, even if you are unsatisfied with the outcome? I can imagine it`s hard to do it, but it would really helps other consumers, and you will at least not have bad scarring.

Good luck to you!

Man why do you think i would hide it if im unsatisfied with the final result ?
My experience is really great so far from the ease of surgery, amazing recovery time and lack of scaring or any evidence of an HT in both the recipient and donor area...
But rest assure that if the final result is not satisfactory, i'll be saying it out loud to everybody, i say it like it is, after all it's my head and i won't be advertising something i paid for and turned out to be a disappointment ...

[hairysituation]

Man why do you think i would hide it if im unsatisfied with the final result ?
My experience is really great so far from the ease of surgery, amazing recovery time and lack of scaring or any evidence of an HT in both the recipient and donor area...
But rest assure that if the final result is not satisfactory, i'll be saying it out loud to everybody, i say it like it is, after all it's my head and i won't be advertising something i paid for and turned out to be a disappointment ...

Good to know, man! Well, the potential dissapoitment is very related to your expactations. What kind of results do you expect?
I`m glad that you had a satisfactory experience so far!

[aim4hair]

After the transplanted hair started to grow and scabs fall (9 days post op) and before the transplanted hair started to fall (not all of them fell btw but most) i was really satisfied with the look (specially the hairline they gave me), so if all the hair grow back again i will be satisfied, and actually i was told that when the hair grow again it will be thicker and stronger which will give me even a better result than the one right post HT.
BTW, i always have my hair buzzed (wesley sneijder style) and that's why lack of scarring was one of the most important factors for me...
It's a waiting game for me now, but to be honest, it puts me on ease knowing that if things go wrong (god forbid) i won't be a prisoner of scars and i can just shave it off with a clipper as i have been doing for the last few years.

[gutted]

for those on the gho procedure - msm and vitc may help with donor regeneration. there was a user who wanted to know what this was in a previous thread, i think it was the user neversaynever.

it also helps with old/new donor scars, they soften out over time.

[534623]

If your donor is limited and you have unlimited funds then Dr Gho is a no-brainer for most people I would think!

I have something more interesting for you …


In fact, I’m talking about THIS –documented- photo (day 2 after having your 2nd HST procedure),
and THIS –undocumented- photo (photo1, day 12 after having your 1st HST procedure),
which I have just digged out again.

Anyway, is there someone who is able to document gc’s original photo of his 1st HST procedure?

This means 1)
to find the EXACT same observation area as in the photo on the left (2nd procedure),
as well as 2)
encircling of all 53 already documented/observed extraction sites/follicular units?

In fact, normally EVERYONE who has installed any picture processing program (photoshop etc) on his computer is able to do this.

Anyway, show me YOUR results – and maybe I will show you guys my result … but I would rather prefer to see YOUR work. With the small pics above, I think I could already give you at least “a hint” where you should find the (already documented) observation area in the other/old photo (1st HST). At least, it shows the area where I "assume" the observation area.

So, what’s the intention in general? What exactly are we trying to find out?
Are we able to find out something really interesting?

[gc83uk]

Iron man, if anyone can do this it would be you, I don't have the patience.

I think you'd have a tough job anyway because the clarity of the earlier image isn't as clear as the later images. I would be interested to see if you could do it though.

By the way, I read on a Swedish forum that a patient was in Maastrict for a consultation recently and after speaking to Gho at length, he was then chatting with some of the other hasci staff/technicians.... The techs were showing the prospective patient an email from a 'happy customer' (this was me) and they were showing the patient the documented thread which you made at hairsite showing the regrowth.

So it seems the Hasci staff are using those photos with the green and blue circles! You can read all that on a forum here http://www.lookgood.se/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=43318


Also take a look at http://www.recuperarelpelo.es/foro/v...ic.php?t=42654
You reckon that is Spanishdude?

[Delphi]

I'm not comfortable with Gho's staff showing a prospective patient a thread from a hair loss forum in an attempt to sell the procedure. In fact , I find this highly unprofessional which puts to question why they wouldn't have better documentation of the success of their procedure than Ironman's illustrations on a patent's set of photos. There something not quit right about this.

It's one thing to point to praise on the internet, but quit another to use these pictures as evidence that the procedure is effective. I'm glad that poster on the other site brought this up.

[534623]

It's one thing to point to praise on the internet, but quit another to use these pictures as evidence that the procedure is effective. I'm glad that poster on the other site brought this up.

Are you able to prove (link to this post) your claims?
I doubt that - because so far you couldn't prove ZILCH ZERO NADA (not even a mouse fart) of all your claims within this thread.

[gc83uk]

I'm not comfortable with Gho's staff showing a prospective patient a thread from a hair loss forum in an attempt to sell the procedure. In fact , I find this highly unprofessional which puts to question why they wouldn't have better documentation of the success of their procedure than Ironman's illustrations on a patent's set of photos. There something not quit right about this.

It's one thing to point to praise on the internet, but quit another to use these pictures as evidence that the procedure is effective. I'm glad that poster on the other site brought this up.

There is absolutely nothing wrong with showing prospective customers a testimonial, which is pretty much what it was. I should know as I wrote the email a few weeks back advising them to take a look at the photos.

[534623]

There is absolutely nothing wrong with showing prospective customers a testimonial ...

Correct...

[Delphi]

There is absolutely nothing wrong with showing prospective customers a testimonial, which is pretty much what it was. I should know as I wrote the email a few weeks back advising them to take a look at the photos.

I agree with you. There is absolutely nothing wrong with you providing your testimonial for prospective patients. That's not my concern. I don't want to have an argument, I just stated my opinion concerning Ironman's photographic "proof" being used to sell procedures.