Nigams doubling test FAILED + proof.

[hellouser]

I don't see why Dr. Nigams has made it so difficult to be transparent on so many occasions (incredibly many) and has yet to follow ANY of the instructions I've posted in regards to proper photography.

In regards to proving his hair doubling method through documentation there are really only two conclusions to come to:

[Possible defamatory comments removed]

For the benefit of the doubt, and as has been suggestion to him many times before to Dr. Nigam:

provide us with proper documentation that has been suggested by members of the forum; proper photography, transparency and INTEGRITY.

[greatjob!]

In regards to proving his hair doubling method through documentation there are really only two conclusions to come to:

a) He's incompetent (in regards to documentation)
b) He's a fraud

Did you see the photos in the directory Arashi posted? They proved he isn't incompetent taking good photos. So that only leaves....

[hellouser]

Did you see the photos in the directory Arashi posted? They proved he isn't incompetent taking good photos. So that only leaves....

I have them, I downloaded a many of the photographs overnight. I dont think I managed to get them all before the folder was either pulled or renamed. I'll take a closer look at them later on.

[Arashi]

I have them, I downloaded a many of the photographs overnight. I dont think I managed to get them all before the folder was either pulled or renamed. I'll take a closer look at them later on.

Even just only look at the pictures in my previous post. They are of steller quality. It's obvious he is great at shooting good photo's. He just doesn't show them to us.

[534623]

Eh, that's was you, bud.

I would be surprised if you could prove what you claim. By the way:
We already talked about this issue many times years ago at HS

You just looked at all extraction points...

Wow, seems I did a great job - contrary to you.

...saw that in 80% of the extraction points hair grew back and then concluded that regrowth was 80%.

In fact, besides the patient himself (gc83uk), the whole world could observe (and is still able to verify!) 84.9%.

While in fact, after taking into consideration that most of the times these were just failed extractions, and thus no regeneration at all...

Prove?
How do you know that "most of the times" especially all of my 53 observed extraction sites "were just failed extractions"??
Please stop making ridiculous claims without any evidence!

[Arashi]

I would be surprised if you could prove what you claim. By the way:
We already talked about this issue many times years ago at HS


Wow, seems I did a great job - contrary to you.


In fact, besides the patient himself (gc83uk), the whole world could observe (and is still able to verify!) 84.9%.


Prove?
How do you know that "most of the times" especially all of my 53 observed extraction sites "were just failed extractions"??
Please stop making ridiculous claims without any evidence!

Haha you're amazing Ironman. I'm not going to repeat everything again, just re-read my open letter to HASCI and read it until you finally get it.

[534623]

..just re-read my open letter to HASCI

Sorry, but nobody cares about your "open shit" - so why should I?

I mean, since you started your "open letter" thread - seriously, who cares??
Or do you got the feeling that the whole world is interested in your "open letter"?? funny ...

[Arashi]

Sorry, but nobody cares about your "open shit" - so why should I?

I mean, since you started your "open letter" thread - seriously, who cares??
Or do you got the feeling that the whole world is interested in your "open letter"?? funny ...

At least people can now read the truth and draw their own conclusions. But most importantly, I did it for myself, to find out if there was some regeneration going on. Cause I was planning my follow up visit. Now I know that it's all just a bunch of crap, nothing but a marketing gimmick, I can just forget about HASCI, keep that money in my pocket and move on.

[HairBane]

Most childish thread of the year award.

[didi]

5489789,

HST is history. Stick a fork in it, finito.


[Incendiary commentary removed. Please refer to our Forum Posting Rules & Terms of Service]

[Number47]

Great job Arashi exposing Nigam finally we can have some peace with all this BS

[Arashi]

[Incendiary commentary removed. Please refer to our Forum Posting Rules & Terms of Service]

[Arashi]

Great job Arashi exposing Nigam finally we can have some peace with all this BS

Thx bro, appreciated.

[Winston]

Any further violations (incendiary or potentially defamatory commentary, etc.) of our TOS will result in immediate account moderation and/or suspension.

Thank you for your understanding in this matter.

[lilpauly]

here is a copy of Dr. Nigam's official qualification as a licensed medical doctor in India, from the Indian national physicians database:


View IMR Details
Name Nigam Vivek
Father/Husband Name
Date of Birth Year of Info 1998
Registration No. 86928 Date of Reg. 23/06/1998
State Medical Council Maharashtra Medical Council
Qualification MBBS Qualification Year 1983
University Name U.Barkatullah
Permanent Address D-1/38, Vishwabharati Society, Khada, Sardar Vallabh Patel Nagar, Andheri (West), Mumbai - 53.

Furthermore, here is the link to the database page which links the above, showing that Dr. Vivek Nigam is licensed with the State of Maharashtra's Medical Council:

http://mciindia.org/InformationDesk/IndianMedicalRegister.aspx

Here's a link to the university where Dr. Nigam studied:

http://www.bubhopal.nic.in/