Let's compare Gaz donor pre-op 2012 and post-op 2013, no?

[Arashi]

Im not saying gz is lying but it doesn't add up.

If that's 1cm then bald area isn't more than 60cm2..MAX.


GC

Can you use this pic http://s23.postimg.org/x1dvxsiyj/recipient2.jpg and draw that exact same square, giant 1cm of yrs

Agreed, it doesn't add up at all. There's no way you can come to 100 cm2 like this: http://postimg.org/image/othp2tzi7/5cbc21c8/

Anyway I've wasted most of my saturday here already, going to enjoy the last part of it Will be back for more discussion later of course

[gc83uk]

Im not saying gz is lying but it doesn't add up.

If that's 1cm then bald area isn't more than 60cm2..MAX.


GC

Can you use this pic http://s23.postimg.org/x1dvxsiyj/recipient2.jpg and draw that exact same square, giant 1cm of yrs

I'm on my phone mate, it might have to be tomorrow now. I might grab mates computer when I get round lol, gimme time.

[gc83uk]

https://www.dropbox.com/s/c3bqa7cow5...for%20didi.jpg


don't think this is 1cm2. Its too big, you saying 100 of these squares is you bald area. if that's 1cm2 then you bald area isn't more than 40cm2...

Yes I'm saying I think I can fit at least 90 of these in my bald area and my MPB window peak area so to speak. Probably more.

I have already proven that the square is 1cm2, Arashi has obviously seen the photo and agrees.

[didi]

Im not saying gz is lying but it doesn't add up.

If that's 1cm then bald area isn't more than 60cm2..MAX.


GC

Can you use this pic http://s23.postimg.org/x1dvxsiyj/recipient2.jpg and draw that exact same square, giant 1cm of yrs

[Arashi]

https://www.dropbox.com/s/c3bqa7cow5...for%20didi.jpg


don't think this is 1cm2. Its too big, you saying 100 of these squares is you bald area. if that's 1cm2 then you bald area isn't more than 40cm2...

I do believe that's 1 cm2. I don't think Gaz is lying, he's not a diehard Gho fanboy who would do that (you know who I mean, lol). But I do think he overestimates the size of the whole area. It's the only explanation for the size of that square in relation to the size of his scalp. Either that square isn't a cm2 (and I believe it is), or the area is just nowhere near 100 cm.

[didi]

https://www.dropbox.com/s/c3bqa7cow50f94m/zoomed%20out%20for%20didi.jpg

don't think this is 1cm2. Its too big, you saying 100 of these squares is you bald area. if that's 1cm2 then you bald area isn't more than 40cm2...

[Arashi]

And the 1cm2 square which I photographed counts for nothing?

Not sure what you mean here gaz ? You mean the difference in density ? It looks like there actually is. The area you counted is much denser it seems.

[gc83uk]

Well, after all we know now, I think we could add about 3-4 more in that line. So in other words, yes, the squares should be around 1 cm2 each.

And the 1cm2 square which I photographed counts for nothing?

[Arashi]

http://s23.postimg.org/x1dvxsiyj/recipient2.jpg


If its 11 cm wide then these squares have to be even smaller but I think they are correct and they only have 15 grafts or so

Well, after all we know now, I think we could add about 3-4 more in that line. So in other words, yes, the squares should be around 1 cm2 each.

[gc83uk]

http://s23.postimg.org/x1dvxsiyj/recipient2.jpg


If its 11 cm wide then these squares have to be even smaller but I think they are correct and they only have 15 grafts or so

Again, why did I count 50 grafts then? lol

And didi that photo you just posted isn't the same width as the tape measure photo, its a joke, it's nowhere near lol. Misses shit loads of new grafts to the left and right.

[didi]

http://s23.postimg.org/x1dvxsiyj/recipient2.jpg

If its 11 cm wide then these squares have to be even smaller but I think they are correct and they only have 15 grafts or so

[gc83uk]

Haha. You're no retard Gaz. But I really just don't see the numbers add up. I don't see how that area could be even close to 100 cm2. I'm not sure how you got to that number, you said it was the size of your hairpiece, but how did they even measure that and didn't it overlap with existing hair ?

OK the former bald area was measured by me at 85cm2 by cutting out card and overlapping the bald area about 2 years ago. I obviously disected the card and worked out the area in multiple pieces. Take my word for this 85cm2 for now at the very least, you owe me that after all this time pal. I will prove it to you with photos, but I'm going out tonight for a huge piss up

As for the extra 15cm, what do you suspect the MPB area is beyond that former slick area? I was guessing 15cm2 but I actually haven't taken the time to actually check this as yet.

[Arashi]

I don't know why you won't believe me, do you think I'm a retard?

Haha. You're no retard Gaz. But I really just don't see the numbers add up. I don't see how that area could be even close to 100 cm2. I'm not sure how you got to that number, you said it was the size of your hairpiece, but how did they even measure that and didn't it overlap with existing hair ?

[gc83uk]

Even if it's slightly longer, that area is nowhere near square. So still, how could it possibly be 100 cm 2?

I don't know why you won't believe me, do you think I'm a retard?

[Arashi]

Why do you keep saying this, why not just wait for the next picture lol, you have simply ignored that I have said it can be 12cm in parts. Maybe even 14cm if I wanted to exaggerate the most swevere point to point.

It's a bare minimum of 85cm2. Take this as fact, no need to guesstimate.

Even if it's slightly longer, that area is nowhere near square. So still, how could it possibly be 100 cm 2?