Let's compare Gaz donor pre-op 2012 and post-op 2013, no?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • gc83uk
    replied
    Originally posted by Arashi
    Ok, so that would be about 10x6 = 60 cm2. Then it would all make sense and the area wasn't 100 cm2, but about 60 cm2.
    lol I bet my life it's not 6cm vertical. You wanna bet? I'll say 10cm and you say 6cm.

    10K on it, yeah, closest wins?

    Leave a comment:


  • Arashi
    replied
    Originally posted by gc83uk
    Photo 1 is from left side, look at my finger, it says 5cm, this is where the bald spot started from originally. Photo1

    Photo 2 is band in the middle I suppose Photo2

    Photo 3 is the final pic and I reckon it stops on around 15.5cm
    Photo3
    Ok, so that would be about 10x6 = 60 cm2. Then it would all make sense and the area wasn't 100 cm2, but about 60 cm2.

    Leave a comment:


  • gc83uk
    replied
    Originally posted by Arashi
    LOL. Something is wrong here. How the hell do you place 3 above here: http://postimg.org/image/t4dl4tcep/d0d2d0a6/ ?
    Yes something is wrong, but I'm trying my best to prove otherwise. At least take a look at the horizontal pics first. Maybe we can look at the vertical bit next. But tell me how wide you think the bald spot is going across first with all the photos I've just done for you.

    Leave a comment:


  • gc83uk
    replied
    Photo 1 is from left side, look at my finger, it says 5cm, this is where the bald spot started from originally. Photo1

    Photo 2 is band in the middle I suppose Photo2

    Photo 3 is the final pic and I reckon it stops on around 15.5cm
    Photo3

    Leave a comment:


  • 534623
    replied
    Originally posted by gc83uk
    Your mrs should simply hold the measuring tape on your head while you try to make the photos. How about that?

    Leave a comment:


  • didi
    replied
    36cm2? 4500 grafts crammed into 36cm2...125 grafts/cm2....cant be


    Gcs bald area is about 90cm2 +- 10%

    Leave a comment:


  • Arashi
    replied
    Originally posted by gc83uk
    That photo with 6 photos vertical, what are you trying to say here? I suppose you could add another 3 above that and you'll reach the edge of my bald spot, right? Maybe 4 actually cos the bald spot goes off the screen there I think. What am I missing?
    LOL. Something is wrong here. How the hell do you place 3 above here: http://postimg.org/image/t4dl4tcep/d0d2d0a6/ ?

    Leave a comment:


  • gc83uk
    replied
    Originally posted by Arashi
    But if that's really a square cm (and I trust you), then ... how do you explain this: http://postimg.org/image/4mn9yz8jh/

    I only have 2 conclusions:

    1) You have a very small head
    2) The bold area was closer to 40 cm2 than 100 cm2. Otherwise I can't explain this: http://postimg.org/image/4mn9yz8jh/
    That photo with 6 photos vertical, what are you trying to say here? I suppose you could add another 3 above that and you'll reach the edge of my bald spot, right? Maybe 4 actually cos the bald spot goes off the screen there I think. What am I missing?

    Leave a comment:


  • Arashi
    replied
    Originally posted by gc83uk
    Boom in your face https://www.dropbox.com/sc/7qbpccqmoy0irbp/1I3RgYiG7U

    Joking of course.

    Here is another:


    These photos are crap sorry, when my camera gets below 15% the flash won't work, I can charge it if you need clearer photos but I think should suffice, plus you should just believe me.

    I honestly don't need to make anything up.

    My head is on the smaller side I suppose, but nothing like a tennis ball, that made me laugh out loud.
    Ok, you have a small head. And I believe you. But then, how the hell can that bald area be 100 cm2 !?!? It then seems closer to 36 cm2. http://postimg.org/image/4mn9yz8jh/

    Leave a comment:


  • gc83uk
    replied
    Originally posted by Arashi
    Hehe, that can't be it either. Look at the picture I posted of the 10 cm on my head. I'm a big guy, Gaz's head is most certainly smaller than mine, so then the first picture including those 10 boxes I drew was right in the first place.

    I just don't see how we're wrong here, Gaz. That paper you've cut must be about 1.5x1.5 cm = 2.25 cm2.

    Boom in your face https://www.dropbox.com/sc/7qbpccqmoy0irbp/1I3RgYiG7U

    Joking of course.

    Here is another:


    These photos are crap sorry, when my camera gets below 15% the flash won't work, I can charge it if you need clearer photos but I think should suffice, plus you should just believe me.

    I honestly don't need to make anything up.

    My head is on the smaller side I suppose, but nothing like a tennis ball, that made me laugh out loud.

    Leave a comment:


  • Arashi
    replied
    Originally posted by gc83uk
    Haha ok lads, I'll photograph the piece of paper first right? I'm baffled by you two at the moment. Then I'll try and get the mrs to help me take a shot with tape measure above head right?

    You've both gone wrong somewhere, trust me.
    But if that's really a square cm (and I trust you), then ... how do you explain this: http://postimg.org/image/4mn9yz8jh/

    I only have 2 conclusions:

    1) You have a very small head
    2) The bold area was closer to 40 cm2 than 100 cm2. Otherwise I can't explain this: http://postimg.org/image/4mn9yz8jh/

    Leave a comment:


  • Arashi
    replied
    Originally posted by didi
    You must have small head GC
    Hehe, that can't be it either. Look at the picture I posted of the 10 cm on my head. I'm a big guy, Gaz's head is most certainly smaller than mine, so then the first picture including those 10 boxes I drew was right in the first place.

    I just don't see how we're wrong here, Gaz. That paper you've cut must be about 1.5x1.5 cm = 2.25 cm2.

    Leave a comment:


  • Arashi
    replied
    Originally posted by gc83uk
    Haha ok lads, I'll photograph the piece of paper first right? I'm baffled by you two at the moment. Then I'll try and get the mrs to help me take a shot with tape measure above head right?

    You've both gone wrong somewhere, trust me.
    Maybe. But I just don't see how ? Those 6 copies of your area I placed on top of each other covers about the diagonal of the area, right? Then how the hell are we supposed to get to 100 cm ? It would be closer to 36 cm2.

    Leave a comment:


  • didi
    replied
    You must have small head GC

    Leave a comment:


  • gc83uk
    replied
    Originally posted by Arashi
    Great minds think alike Didi, lol Gaz that can't possibly be a square cm. Not even close. Must be about 2.5 cm2.
    Haha ok lads, I'll photograph the piece of paper first right? I'm baffled by you two at the moment. Then I'll try and get the mrs to help me take a shot with tape measure above head right?

    You've both gone wrong somewhere, trust me.

    Leave a comment:

Working...