Dr Nigam agrees to doubling slick NW6/NW7

[mnhair]

apparently Nigams technique cant be done in Europe or USA due to the FDA

Spencer and Mwamba said the exact opposite.

[FearTheLoss]

apparently Nigams technique cant be done in Europe or USA due to the FDA

Stop spreading false rumors, that isn't true at all.

DONOR DOUBLING can be done anywhere.

[crafter]

apparently Nigams technique cant be done in Europe or USA due to the FDA

[hiilikeyourbeard]

I understand bro. anyone else see where he said that cases donor is better than before? how is that even possible!!?

[hellouser]

...those pictures were fine, jesus christ. you'll be able to tell even with a terrible camera if these cases are working. can't fake slick bald nw7 to nw1 even with an old track phone camera. i get that you guys want good documentation as we all do but holy crap those pictures aren't even bad.

Lets not take any chances.

[hiilikeyourbeard]

...those pictures were fine, jesus christ. you'll be able to tell even with a terrible camera if these cases are working. can't fake slick bald nw7 to nw1 even with an old track phone camera. i get that you guys want good documentation as we all do but holy crap those pictures aren't even bad.

[hellouser]

specs are soo overrated

its about person taking photos and what he wants us to see or not see, Gc was able to do it with cheap digi cam, bet you can take amazing photos with your smarphone, right? canon 1000d is more than enough to take excellent photos.


anyway,any news on Thane, is he takin up an offer?

The post I made contains more settings in the camera than the specs of the camera. In fact, I didnt mention which camera should be used but only the lens as its specific to our intent (one that can focus CLOSE to the scalp). Settings the camera uses are universal. If GK achieved proper photographs, its possible the camera's settings we're similar to the list I made.

EDIT TO PHOTOGRAPHY GUIDELINE!!!!!:
God damn it, I wish I was able to edit posts! I made a small mistake in my post. Initially I thought a general lens like a 24-105mm F/4L would do fine, but I thought more about the minimum focus distance and suggested the 28mm and 60mm lenses. Both of those are prime lenses, so my suggestion of 35-70mm is redundant, therefor the focal length should be 28mm or 60mm!

[didi]

specs are soo overrated

its about person taking photos and what he wants us to see or not see, Gc was able to do it with cheap digi cam, bet you can take amazing photos with your smarphone, right? canon 1000d is more than enough to take excellent photos.


anyway,any news on Thane, is he takin up an offer?

[idontwant2bebalding]

That actually would be a great idea. IAHRS members should follow guidelines like those to keep their membership.

Someone should forward these specs to Dr. Mwamba as I'm sure he will be required to provide photos of the same level of accuracy.

[Arashi]

Love it, these specs. should be a requirement of ALL IAHRS members. No pictures should be accepted on this forum unless they meet these specs.

That actually would be a great idea. IAHRS members should follow guidelines like those to keep their membership.

[drnigams]

Hellouser,

I will pass on these details to the photographer,thanks for ur inputs.

In the mean time,there is an potential exciting news for you all..

But, i did not want to say it myself..
you should ask TOM and dr mwamba...

dr mwamba took pics of TOM and did hair count of the donor...

This is what tom told me on skype..(i would like to confirmation of the same from dr mwamba)

0 white dots, near complete donor regen..
from where follicles were taken(that's what tom said,i am yet to see the pics)..
tom said donor looks same as in before pics.
tom;s donor around his scar was shaved again ..by dr mwamba..
and hair count was done with before and after pics..

which showed complete donor regen..
(again that's what tom said..i am yet to see the pics..).

the pics are with dr mwamba...

he is in china for a stemcell conference..would be back in 2 days...

Ask them to provide you with photos and their independent assessment.

Couldnt agree more.

[idontwant2bebalding]

Here's what you should do:

Find a professional PRODUCT photographer, someone who takes photos of food, shoes, clothes, etc. These guys will know best how to set up, light and capture inanimate objects with DETAIL. We're not looking for 'the big picture' with some kind setting/background, we just need one object completely in focus as large as possible.

The photographer should ideally provide photos at:

400 ISO or lower
35-70mm Focal Length
1/100 second or faster shutter speed
f/11-f/16 aperture
Shoot at the nearest distance possible
Suggested Lens:
Canon EF 28mm f/2.8 IS
Canon EF-S 60mm f/2,8 USM Macro
Camera Body: any dSLR at 12mp or higher
Lighting: using umbrellas or softboxes (diffused light MUST be used)

The lenses I've suggested are mostly for the reason of their minimum focusing distance, which is 23cm for the 28mm and 20cm for the 60mm Macro lens. The macro lens would be great for very very close shots of the hair follicle up close, similar to the photo of the ant I showed earlier.

Give THIS list to the photographer and you shouldn't have problems.

Love it, these specs. should be a requirement of ALL IAHRS members. No pictures should be accepted on this forum unless they meet these specs.

[Arashi]

Here's what you should do:

Find a professional PRODUCT photographer, someone who takes photos of food, shoes, clothes, etc. These guys will know best how to set up, light and capture inanimate objects with DETAIL. We're not looking for 'the big picture' with some kind setting/background, we just need one object completely in focus as large as possible.

The photographer should ideally provide photos at:

400 ISO or lower
35-70mm Focal Length
1/100 second or faster shutter speed
f/11-f/16 aperture
Shoot at the nearest distance possible
Suggested Lens:
Canon EF 28mm f/2.8 IS
Canon EF-S 60mm f/2,8 USM Macro
Camera Body: any dSLR at 12mp or higher
Lighting: using umbrellas or softboxes (diffused light MUST be used)

The lenses I've suggested are mostly for the reason of their minimum focusing distance, which is 23cm for the 28mm and 20cm for the 60mm Macro lens. The macro lens would be great for very very close shots of the hair follicle up close, similar to the photo of the ant I showed earlier.

Couldnt agree more.

[hellouser]

Arashi,hellouser,greatjob,one...

I will try,not to disappoint you all with photographs...
will call professional photographer for the cases to be documented .

This sunday i am calling the patient mr joshi..and his pics will be taken by professional photographer.

But before i post them..i want to first mail it to arashi...
if he is fine with it..i will post on the forum..if not..we will try and take the pics again...
I have taken a printout of hellouser guide..and will hand that over to the photographer.

Here's what you should do:

Find a professional PRODUCT photographer, someone who takes photos of food, shoes, clothes, etc. These guys will know best how to set up, light and capture inanimate objects with DETAIL. We're not looking for 'the big picture' with some kind setting/background, we just need one object completely in focus as large as possible.

The photographer should ideally provide photos at:

400 ISO or lower
35-70mm Focal Length (or 28mm and 60mm according to lens suggested below)
1/100 second or faster shutter speed
f/11-f/16 aperture
Shoot at the nearest distance possible
Suggested Lens:
Canon EF 28mm f/2.8 IS
Canon EF-S 60mm f/2,8 USM Macro
Camera Body: any dSLR at 12mp or higher
Lighting: using umbrellas or softboxes (diffused light MUST be used)

The lenses I've suggested are mostly for the reason of their minimum focusing distance, which is 23cm for the 28mm and 20cm for the 60mm Macro lens. The macro lens would be great for very very close shots of the hair follicle up close, similar to the photo of the ant I showed earlier.

Give THIS list to the photographer and you shouldn't have problems.

[idontwant2bebalding]

You see, that is what these forums are for.

We asked for better test subjects and Dr. Nigam has obliged. We asked for the Holy Grail of proof by converting a NW7 to a NW 2 and Dr. Nigam is obliging. We asked for better photos and have a professional do it and Dr. Nigam is obliging. We asked for and explained the angles of the photos, the lighting of the photos, the setting on the camera itself and Dr. Nigam is obliging. He is willing to get preapproval of those subjects and photos before posting them.

I'm not making any assumptions, but we also asked for a way to get a full head of hair again!