Histogen at the ISHRS conference

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • FearTheLoss
    replied
    Originally posted by garethbale
    Propecia is only good for the crown. My hair loss is on the temples and hair line, where propecia is useless.
    That isn't true at all!

    I haven't been on a hair loss forum for ages. I started to loss my hair around 19 but didn't notice that I was losing my hair until I was 20 years old. I did something about it when I turn 21 when it got really bad. I started to take propecia and got really good results. Then I started to added nizoral 1% and then 2% for a few


    Discover Propecia (Finasteride) for hair loss treatment, expertly reviewed by Dr. Robert M. Bernstein. Learn about its benefits, usage, and effectiveness today!

    Leave a comment:


  • yeahyeahyeah
    replied
    Originally posted by garethbale
    I have been trying to hold on to my hair line but it is receding a bit. That's why I am considering going to Gho for a hairline transplant.

    BUT, I would not dense pack it, as:

    a. we don't know if/when Aderans (or Histogen or Replicel) will be available

    b. how well these treatments will work if they do come out

    I am hoping new treatments will be available in a few years but I still think its too risky to expect them to come and 'save us', hence why I wouldn't dense pack my hair line

    Got a pic of your hairline?

    Leave a comment:


  • garethbale
    replied
    Originally posted by yeahyeahyeah
    Well you can then use Aderans in conjunction with a HT.

    Just dense pack your hairline without ever worrying about further thinning.

    I don't see what the problem is here guys.

    I have been trying to hold on to my hair line but it is receding a bit. That's why I am considering going to Gho for a hairline transplant.

    BUT, I would not dense pack it, as:

    a. we don't know if/when Aderans (or Histogen or Replicel) will be available

    b. how well these treatments will work if they do come out

    I am hoping new treatments will be available in a few years but I still think its too risky to expect them to come and 'save us', hence why I wouldn't dense pack my hair line

    Leave a comment:


  • yeahyeahyeah
    replied
    Originally posted by garethbale
    Propecia is only good for the crown. My hair loss is on the temples and hair line, where propecia is useless.
    Well you can then use Aderans in conjunction with a HT.

    Just dense pack your hairline without ever worrying about further thinning.

    I don't see what the problem is here guys.

    Leave a comment:


  • garethbale
    replied
    Originally posted by FearTheLoss
    a lot of people would be hella happy with a propecia affect without sides!
    Propecia is only good for the crown. My hair loss is on the temples and hair line, where propecia is useless.

    Leave a comment:


  • FearTheLoss
    replied
    a lot of people would be hella happy with a propecia affect without sides!

    Leave a comment:


  • yeahyeahyeah
    replied
    Originally posted by UK Boy
    Yeah they're heading into phase III but if you listen to what Doctor Washnik says about the treatment at the 2012 MESA meeting it just doesn't sound like that great a treatment at all. If the cost was low enough and they didn't have to take a slice of scalp to do it then I'd still go for it. If it proves to make hairs immune to DHT I'd also do it. But at the mo all he says is that 40% of the 60% that it works for get Propecia equivalent regrowth of miniturized follicles. Just listen to the MESA video, Ironman's right about that, people aren't bothering but the info's all there.
    Yeah propecia style regrowth without the sides

    Leave a comment:


  • UK Boy
    replied
    Originally posted by FearTheLoss
    Why did you lose hope in Aderans? they are heading to phase III!!!
    Yeah they're heading into phase III but if you listen to what Doctor Washnik says about the treatment at the 2012 MESA meeting it just doesn't sound like that great a treatment at all. If the cost was low enough and they didn't have to take a slice of scalp to do it then I'd still go for it. If it proves to make hairs immune to DHT I'd also do it. But at the mo all he says is that 40% of the 60% that it works for get Propecia equivalent regrowth of miniturized follicles. Just listen to the MESA video, Ironman's right about that, people aren't bothering but the info's all there.

    Leave a comment:


  • UK Boy
    replied
    Originally posted by FearTheLoss
    Why did you lose hope in Aderans? they are heading to phase III!!!
    Yeah they're heading into phase III but if you listen to what Doctor Washnik says about the treatment at the 2012 MESA meeting it just doesn't sound like that great a treatment at all. If the cost was low enough and they didn't have to take a slice of scalp to do it then I'd still go for it. If it proves to make hairs immune to DHT I'd also do it. But at the mo all he says is that 40% of the 60% that it works for get Propecia equivalent regrowth of miniturized follicles. Just listen to the MESA video, Ironman's right about that, people aren't bothering but the info's all there.

    Leave a comment:


  • FearTheLoss
    replied
    Originally posted by UK Boy
    I just really hope that Histogen have resolved the issues with their photos when they present their next results. I'm dreading that they're going to just release the same standard of photos and that all the doubters will continue to pick fault in them. I wish people hadn't scared doctor Ziering off this forum cos then we could ask him about things like "why does Ironmans count show the same numbers of hairs in each picture etc." I've already lost tonnes of hope in Aderans, I don't wanna do the same with Histogen cos I've always preferred them. The thing is that the photos are proving to be a real issue in the everyone says they're snake oil type photos which doesn't back up the statistical info. I'm just feeling really feed up of all this let downs.


    Why did you lose hope in Aderans? they are heading to phase III!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • rdawg
    replied
    haha I really wish we could get an insider or just not be left in the dark so much with these products.

    don't get me wrong I know it's a process, but it's like we get big news, then we don't hear from the companies for 5-6 months!

    Leave a comment:


  • UK Boy
    replied
    Histogen photos

    I just really hope that Histogen have resolved the issues with their photos when they present their next results. I'm dreading that they're going to just release the same standard of photos and that all the doubters will continue to pick fault in them. I wish people hadn't scared doctor Ziering off this forum cos then we could ask him about things like "why does Ironmans count show the same numbers of hairs in each picture etc." I've already lost tonnes of hope in Aderans, I don't wanna do the same with Histogen cos I've always preferred them. The thing is that the photos are proving to be a real issue in the everyone says they're snake oil type photos which doesn't back up the statistical info. I'm just feeling really feed up of all this let downs.

    Leave a comment:


  • 534623
    replied
    Originally posted by Breaking Bald

    I'm done feeding the troll
    hmmm, I have no problems with feeding suckers.

    Leave a comment:


  • Breaking Bald
    replied
    Originally posted by 534623
    hmmm, to the best of my knowledge (oh, and my knowledge is really plentiful), those, who try to analyze others in such a way as you do, oh well, you can add for them a lot more things to their 'analysis' about others.
    haha ok...well I think I'm done arguing with you for now, try to find someone else. I'm done feeding the troll, find another feeder. Man, it's like nursing a little baby.

    Leave a comment:


  • 534623
    replied
    Originally posted by Breaking Bald

    A sad lonely, cynical man in his mid 40's arguing with people half of his age on the internet all day and all night. I feel pretty sorry for you to be honest. Do you have trouble with real life social interactions? Do you have obsessive characteristics? Odd behavioral patterns? Do you lack empathy? Avoid eye contact with face to face interactions?
    hmmm, to the best of my knowledge (oh, and my knowledge is really plentiful), those, who try to analyze others in such a way as you do, oh well, you can add for them a lot more things to their 'analysis' about others.

    Leave a comment:

Working...