Neversay,Your suggestions,ironman and gc's documentation are good enough to provide you all ,what you are looking for.
QUOTE=neversaynever;96373]Dr nigam, thank you for the effort. I dont mean to be rude but the pho
tos are very poor quality...
I am able to achieve better quality myself at home with a very cheap camera. With a good camera you should be able to achieve far better.
Remember we need clarity for the following reasons:
- So we can see regeneration of 2 and 3 hair follicles
- so we can count hairs easily
- so we can match the hairs from each photo
Remember also that
- patients in photos need to have short hair
- you can take many photos and choose the best match
- you can include tatoo or use a natural birth mark
IF those criterea are not met, the evidence is of no use.
Angles and lighting are important, but not as important as clarity. The lighting just has to be good enough so we can see hairs clearly.
I will be in mumbai in febuary, i really hope we can see better evidence before then.
Thank you again for the efforts.[/QUOTE]
QUOTE=neversaynever;96373]Dr nigam, thank you for the effort. I dont mean to be rude but the pho
tos are very poor quality...
I am able to achieve better quality myself at home with a very cheap camera. With a good camera you should be able to achieve far better.
Remember we need clarity for the following reasons:
- So we can see regeneration of 2 and 3 hair follicles
- so we can count hairs easily
- so we can match the hairs from each photo
Remember also that
- patients in photos need to have short hair
- you can take many photos and choose the best match
- you can include tatoo or use a natural birth mark
IF those criterea are not met, the evidence is of no use.
Angles and lighting are important, but not as important as clarity. The lighting just has to be good enough so we can see hairs clearly.
I will be in mumbai in febuary, i really hope we can see better evidence before then.
Thank you again for the efforts.[/QUOTE]
Comment