I said that it wouldn't answer all questions but it would give us some level of proof. If we see no visible scarring, 80+% donor regeneration, 90+% recipient yield, and the transplanted hair appears to be of the same quality as the existing hair, after a year or so, then that's enough proof for me personally that his procedure works and is above and beyond all other procedures offered today. No other procedure even claims to be scarless or offer any donor regeneration, so that by itself is enormous.
Of course, there are other remaining questions that you alluded to, but for now I'll take a study like the one I mentioned. I would love to see an extremely detailed look at HST, but I would hope the same for standard hair transplants, since many questions remain about that as well. Also, nobody claims there is an unlimited donor supply, just 80+% donor regeneration.
Of course, there are other remaining questions that you alluded to, but for now I'll take a study like the one I mentioned. I would love to see an extremely detailed look at HST, but I would hope the same for standard hair transplants, since many questions remain about that as well. Also, nobody claims there is an unlimited donor supply, just 80+% donor regeneration.
Comment