Aderans

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • yeahyeahyeah
    Senior Member
    • Nov 2011
    • 1776

    Originally posted by UK_
    Look how long phase 2 has taken lol - you people really think they'll be done & dusted with phase 3 after 1 year? hahahaha that 2014 timeline is rubbish.
    phase 2 look long cos of the direction of the hair causing problems.

    After phase 2, they wouldn't need to tweek it, rather test it on a larger amount of people. So, in theory, it should be quicker.

    Comment

    • Alf
      Member
      • Jul 2012
      • 91

      Originally posted by UK_
      Look how long phase 2 has taken lol - you people really think they'll be done & dusted with phase 3 after 1 year? hahahaha that 2014 timeline is rubbish.

      I'm sceptic about 2014 too, but if they can start phase 3 imediate after the original phase 2 has finished then we're back in business. Of course thats a big if and who knows what kind of results the are able to get.

      But to another point, anyone knows what you get for participating in phase 3, would they give you as much aderans you need to get the job done or do you just get a couple of square inches? I guess they have to give someone the full job, but all of them? Then they can count me in! Have to move to USA, but I'm going aborad to study anyway so why not america.

      Comment

      • Follicle Death Row
        Senior Member
        • May 2011
        • 1058

        If we knew 2016 was 100% for definite would we all be happy? I certainly would.

        Comment

        • UK_
          Senior Member
          • Feb 2011
          • 2691

          Originally posted by yeahyeahyeah
          phase 2 look long cos of the direction of the hair causing problems.

          After phase 2, they wouldn't need to tweek it, rather test it on a larger amount of people. So, in theory, it should be quicker.
          Hmm - good point, I guess also they'll have actually chosen the most powerful protocol and only be testing the best one instead of spending years testing several protocols (I bet this is what ate up most of the time during Phase II).

          Comment

          • UK_
            Senior Member
            • Feb 2011
            • 2691

            Originally posted by Follicle Death Row
            If we knew 2016 was 100% for definite would we all be happy? I certainly would.
            Ive been waiting since the 80's so erm lol yeah I'd be happy.

            Comment

            • yeahyeahyeah
              Senior Member
              • Nov 2011
              • 1776

              Originally posted by UK_
              Ive been waiting since the 80's so erm lol yeah I'd be happy.
              Science was too primative in the 80s-90s

              Comment

              • UK_
                Senior Member
                • Feb 2011
                • 2691

                Yep sure was, I remember Minoxidil was just like the way RU is today lol you could only get it in powder/pill form and then have to crush them to apply it topically - and we were waiting for finasteride to be released lol.

                Comment

                • yeahyeahyeah
                  Senior Member
                  • Nov 2011
                  • 1776

                  Originally posted by UK_
                  Yep sure was, I remember Minoxidil was just like the way RU is today lol you could only get it in powder/pill form and then have to crush them to apply it topically - and we were waiting for finasteride to be released lol.
                  Thats why all the pessimists are stupid for saying new treatments wont come out, we are at that stage right now.

                  Regenerative medicine is the future.

                  Comment

                  • Alf
                    Member
                    • Jul 2012
                    • 91

                    Originally posted by UK_
                    Ive been waiting since the 80's so erm lol yeah I'd be happy.
                    But are you still wanting the cure for the same reasons? Dont want to be impolite, but being bald in your 50/60s(2016) isn't that bad? getting the hair back is maybe more to look younger?

                    Again don't want to be implite, but I'm 24 and was hoping that after I hit 30 I wouldn't care about my hair loss.

                    Comment

                    • UK_
                      Senior Member
                      • Feb 2011
                      • 2691

                      Originally posted by Alf
                      But are you still wanting the cure for the same reasons? Dont want to be impolite, but being bald in your 50/60s(2016) isn't that bad? getting the hair back is maybe more to look younger?

                      Again don't want to be implite, but I'm 24 and was hoping that after I hit 30 I wouldn't care about my hair loss.
                      lol you will always care about your hair loss. I used to tell myself at 23 once I got married had children and grew older I wouldnt care... well... lol I was wrong.

                      Comment

                      • Alf
                        Member
                        • Jul 2012
                        • 91

                        Originally posted by UK_
                        lol you will always care about your hair loss. I used to tell myself at 23 once I got married had children and grew older I wouldnt care... well... lol I was wrong.
                        Fu*k! But atleast my little brother will be bald then too I'm not kidding if he does not start balding soon i'm not sure what to do.

                        Comment

                        • briandesigns
                          Junior Member
                          • Jul 2012
                          • 15

                          lol, wishing for loved ones to go bald is not a good thing

                          Comment

                          • UK_
                            Senior Member
                            • Feb 2011
                            • 2691

                            How old is Dr Cots? Because according to this journalist he's spent several decades working on a cure for hair loss, was he studying hair loss in the womb?

                            Comment

                            • UK_
                              Senior Member
                              • Feb 2011
                              • 2691

                              Originally posted by Alf
                              Fu*k! But atleast my little brother will be bald then too I'm not kidding if he does not start balding soon i'm not sure what to do.
                              Look on the bright side, atleast you're not stuck in 1989 waiting for Propecia to be released lol.

                              Comment

                              • Kiwi
                                Senior Member
                                • Mar 2011
                                • 1087

                                Originally posted by UK_
                                Look on the bright side, atleast you're not stuck in 1989 waiting for Propecia to be released lol.
                                I can't even fathom this.

                                But after getting a failed HT (there are not 3000+ hairs in my f___ng head and ACELL don't do shit) I feel like I'm in the same boat as you even though I'm 34.

                                If HTs were not around and if there wasnt crap hype I wouldnt have flown to Carolina to get a HT, and I would have simply shaved my head. Now I feel like a damn fool.

                                Aderans can't come quickly enough!!!

                                Comment

                                Working...