Aderans

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Thinning87
    Senior Member
    • Dec 2012
    • 839

    It took them years to do phase 2, how do you know they will be done with phase 3 so quickly?

    Comment

    • yeahyeahyeah
      Senior Member
      • Nov 2011
      • 1776

      Originally posted by Thinning87
      It took them years to do phase 2, how do you know they will be done with phase 3 so quickly?
      You best bet is histogen.

      Comment

      • 534623
        Senior Member
        • Oct 2011
        • 1854

        Originally posted by Thinning87
        It took them years to do phase 2, how do you know they will be done with phase 3 so quickly?
        The pic I posted, is based on Dr. Washenik's original timeline pic he presented in June 2010 in Tokyo - I have just prolonged accordingly his timeline pic.

        Anyway, in Washenik's timeline pic, he calculated for every phase 2 and phase 3 trail (see the BLACK arrows Washenik made in the pic!) around 15-18 month.

        here is Washenik's original timeline pic:



        He is actually very similar to Nigam:
        Washenik changes every 2 years his protocol, Nigam every 2 days.

        Comment

        • StinkySmurf
          Senior Member
          • Dec 2012
          • 124

          Originally posted by Desmond84
          Unlike with drugs or HT, where you increase risk the "more" of the procedure you use, with Aderans procedure you do not increase risk on successive treatments. And each time, you have the same odds of growing hair. With the same odds each time and zero increased risk, results should be compoundable.

          I'm not sure about this theory... Only time will tell. But that's what I'm relying on now for Aderans. I think I'm right on this. But if this theory doesn't pan out, Aderans may become yet another colossal failure[/I]"
          Desmond, you've mentioned several times you think cultured DP cells don't increase or decrease in number so doesn't there have to be some type of upper limit on the number of cells you can have placed in your scalp like this and if we're worried about a remote chance of skin cancer does this increase it or is the cancer risk really unrelated to the dosage?

          Comment

          • Desmond84
            Senior Member
            • Oct 2012
            • 987

            Originally posted by StinkySmurf
            Desmond, you've mentioned several times you think cultured DP cells don't increase or decrease in number so doesn't there have to be some type of upper limit on the number of cells you can have placed in your scalp like this and if we're worried about a remote chance of skin cancer does this increase it or is the cancer risk really unrelated to the dosage?
            That's a really good question and unfortunately only can be answered by the Aderans team. Their preclinical studies showed that extra DP cells do find their way into the hair follicle and aggregate with the original DP cells. So although there might be an upper limit, if the hair follicle has shrunk then more DP cells may be able to bind!

            With regards to cancer, that's something they've been monitoring for FDA approval since day 1. I am also a bit worried about that but can't really comment until I read their clinical data.

            In theory though, it should be OK. I mean even though we don't have anybody offering DP transplantation at this point, we know of many hospitals using stem cell transplantations and that has proven safe with no risk of cancer!

            Comment

            • StinkySmurf
              Senior Member
              • Dec 2012
              • 124

              Originally posted by Desmond84
              That's a really good question and unfortunately only can be answered by the Aderans team. Their preclinical studies showed that extra DP cells do find their way into the hair follicle and aggregate with the original DP cells. So although there might be an upper limit, if the hair follicle has shrunk then more DP cells may be able to bind!
              Haha! yes, I guess I wonder more about the cells that didn't bind to a follicle. Where do they end up and is that bad if you get too many floating around with nothing to do?

              Hey I sent an email to your hotmail

              Comment

              • Desmond84
                Senior Member
                • Oct 2012
                • 987

                I wouldn't worry too much about the ones that didn't make it!

                Your body has immune cells that Police the intracellular environment. These include T cells, B cells, Macrophages, etc...

                If they detect a cell that shouldn't be there, they either engulf it and cause phagocytosis (implode) or rupture the cell and cause apoptosis (explode).

                Btw I just replied to ur email

                Comment

                • neversaynever
                  Senior Member
                  • Dec 2011
                  • 640

                  "The cells of the DP are not only essential for hair follicle development and function, but are also a reservoir of cells with the potential to differentiate into a range of cell types that are of potential therapeutic importance"



                  Maybe those cells unused by the follicles are destroyed by the immune system, but I guess theres a chance that they become different cell types.

                  Comment

                  • 534623
                    Senior Member
                    • Oct 2011
                    • 1854

                    Originally posted by Desmond84
                    Here's a little summary

                    DHT is by far the main culprit, hence why Finasteride is so powerful at halting hairloss. Now:

                    1) To date, we have only found Androgen receptors on the dermal papillae & sebaceous glands of hair follicles.
                    • DP cells are the most important contributor to follicle growth and cycling.
                    • Sebaceous glands don't serve any roles in terms of growth, they are more of a supportive structure.

                    Hence, the reason why Aderans decided to use DP cells! Here's the link:



                    YOUR LINK DOESN'T WORK!

                    2) Here's the most AMAZING finding: back in late 90's it was found that "Dermal papillae extracted from occipital scalp hair follicles (donor area) lack Androgen receptors!

                    Here's the link:



                    That's why I think at least in theory, DHT-resistance may be possible!

                    In another word, after DP transplantation, you will have TWO types of DP cells present in the root of the hair follicle (this is known as a "chimeric" follicle btw):

                    1) Original DP cells that are sensitive to DHT --> these are shrinking and refuse to provide the growth factors and signals necessary to promote hair growth.

                    2) Transplanted DP cells that lack Androgen receptors --> these cells would aggregate to form fully functional DP which support a healthy hair growth cycle!

                    Here's a little excerpt from one of the publications I found:

                    "The treatment area would be miniaturized follicles that are cosmetically insignificant, and the strategy would be to rejuvenate miniaturized follicles by the insertion of hair-inductive DP cells. Because the cellular target in androgenetic alopecia is the dermal papilla, providing the follicle with new, androgen-insensitive DP cells might reactivate the follicle to form a normal (terminal) hair. "




                    Furthermore:

                    "Dermal Papillae cells remain the same throughout your whole life. They don't die or replicate." They simply move up and down the hair follicle during Anagen & Catagen Phase."
                    Thanks, Desmond - I didn't see your answer.

                    Anyway, the 1st posted link doesn't work - so I can't see who are the scientists who talk so much BS. The thingy with the sebaceous glands is correct. The "Tokyo-guys" confirmed this recently too.

                    Comment

                    • yeahyeahyeah
                      Senior Member
                      • Nov 2011
                      • 1776

                      Originally posted by 534623
                      The pic I posted, is based on Dr. Washenik's original timeline pic he presented in June 2010 in Tokyo - I have just prolonged accordingly his timeline pic.

                      Anyway, in Washenik's timeline pic, he calculated for every phase 2 and phase 3 trail (see the BLACK arrows Washenik made in the pic!) around 15-18 month.

                      here is Washenik's original timeline pic:



                      He is actually very similar to Nigam:
                      Washenik changes every 2 years his protocol, Nigam every 2 days.
                      Who made the black arrow, you or him?

                      I am confused.

                      Comment

                      • 534623
                        Senior Member
                        • Oct 2011
                        • 1854

                        Originally posted by yeahyeahyeah
                        Who made the black arrow, you or him?

                        I am confused.
                        Spencer Kobren made the original black arrows in the original timeline pic - as explained in my previous post.

                        Comment

                        • Desmond84
                          Senior Member
                          • Oct 2012
                          • 987

                          Guys if Aderans can halt hair loss with a single treatment we are in a much better place than today!

                          Keep checking this thread for new info! Don't give up my brothers and sisters!

                          We are most probably really close

                          Comment

                          • 534623
                            Senior Member
                            • Oct 2011
                            • 1854

                            Originally posted by Desmond84
                            Guys if Aderans can halt hair loss with a single treatment we are in a much better place than today!

                            Keep checking this thread for new info!
                            You’re a little bit overoptimistic.




                            In this presentation (June 2010), Dr. Washenik is talking about “Ji Gami CN” – the final product.
                            CN is THE product, which works best of all (9 all in all) the other protocols (N, C, etc). In his old timeline table (2010), Dr. WASHENIK (not me or someone else, of course!) calculated the duration for every phase 2 or phase 3 trail with around 15-18 month – again, according to Washenik’s BLACK ARROWS in his old timeline table.

                            But the phase 2 clinical trail for Ji Gami CN …



                            ... started, in fact, in June, 2012 - and NOT in spring, 2011 (according to Washenik’s old timeline) – right?

                            According to this …


                            … THIS would be, in fact (best-case-scenario), the new timeline table.

                            And there is a question:
                            How long does it take 1) to get around 1000 trail subjects or so (?) for phase 3 trails – including 2) collecting and evaluating of all the outcome-data after around 18 month or so? And finally 3) how long does it take to get FDA approval thereafter?

                            And there is still THE big problem concerning "effectiveness" …



                            If the ARI guys are still using the existing hair follicle structure, and that’s what they say, the mentioned “leakage-problem” in AGA affected skin is definitely NOT solved with this kind of approach.
                            Attached Files

                            Comment

                            • Desmond84
                              Senior Member
                              • Oct 2012
                              • 987

                              Originally posted by 534623
                              You’re a little bit overoptimistic.




                              In this presentation (June 2010), Dr. Washenik is talking about “Ji Gami CN” – the final product.
                              CN is THE product, which works best of all (9 all in all) the other protocols (N, C, etc). In his old timeline table (2010), Dr. WASHENIK (not me or someone else, of course!) calculated the duration for every phase 2 or phase 3 trail with around 15-18 month – again, according to Washenik’s BLACK ARROWS in his old timeline table.

                              But the phase 2 clinical trail for Ji Gami CN …



                              ... started, in fact, in June, 2012 - and NOT in spring, 2011 (according to Washenik’s old timeline) – right?

                              According to this …


                              … THIS would be, in fact (best-case-scenario), the new timeline table.

                              And there is a question:
                              How long does it take 1) to get around 1000 trail subjects or so (?) for phase 3 trails – including 2) collecting and evaluating of all the outcome-data after around 18 month or so? And finally 3) how long does it take to get FDA approval thereafter?

                              And there is still THE big problem concerning "effectiveness" …



                              If the ARI guys are still using the existing hair follicle structure, and that’s what they say, the mentioned “leakage-problem” in AGA affected skin is definitely NOT solved with this kind of approach.
                              Dude I had exactly the same thoughts on the release date! Late 2015 sounds reasonable and realistic!

                              With regards to efficacy, they showed that with a single therapy session they achieved what Propecia could do in 60% of patients! Now I might be optimistic but that's one hell of an achievement!

                              Don't forget that histogen is also on the horizon and will boost the regrowth numbers even further!

                              Sorry about the post b4. I just saw that thread about IARHS conference and was raging when I saw the 8-10 years thing!

                              To a HAIRY FUTURE

                              Comment

                              • Desmond84
                                Senior Member
                                • Oct 2012
                                • 987

                                If the leakage thing is true we probably wouldn't be getting results close to Propecia (15-20% regrowth + maintenance).

                                P.S. That study is in 2003 way before Aderans got to tweak their formula!

                                Comment

                                Working...