Something new?

[bananana]

I really don't know what to make of it.
As everyone would agree - common sense tells us this is highly unlikely to be true.

But then again, there is always hope. Regarding to these photos, first ones are clearly taken with a flash, second ones aren't (flash ALWAYS makes things look worse hair-wise). He also colored his hair in the tone of skin, that helps with concealment, but still - this man has obvious hair growth but I'm far from convinced. He hasn't done HT as far as I see.
It's bit far fetched but the "blonde" photos might be 10 years old, and the "black" photos new.

Tracy - all the tricks aside - this man visibly has MORE hair, you can't fake those crown hair with light, color etc... Only with photoshop.

Until we actually TALK to someone who has done it and has tons of photos and can speak to us freely - I'm skeptical.

[Tracy C]

Follicle Nutrient Deficiency Syndrome?

Seriously?

Just to make a point. With my hair in the state it is currently in, I can make my hair look like both the before and after photos of both those women in the "before and after" photo banner (Gina Galvis and Maria Miranda). They just change the style of their hair and use photo flash trickery.

[gmonasco]

Here's more on Ian (Park, presumably):

https://www.thedailybell.com/3528/Ron-Holland-Youd-Have-To-Be-Crazy-To-Start-a-Global-Business-in-the-USA-As-a-Public-Company

[bananana]

Those are pretty generic names, and those people will be extremely hard to find (if they exist )

I googled Ian Park - there are probably few thousands of them.

[elvispresley]

20 years guys.. of development.. So they've been around since 1992.. and 6 years of "successful" field trials.. So they alleging first that their trials were successful and second that they started trials in 2006..

How is it possible that no one has heard of them or their science, progress and potential SUCCESSFUL TRIAL???

When something is too good to be true it usually is..

I can't access the before and afters but maybe in 2006 growing a few sparse follicles on the head was considered successful..

It will be hard to convince me that this isn't something that is (1) Bullshit (2) If legit, effective.

it sounds BShit , BUT! until we contact the persons who did the treatment this cannot be sure 100% , so the ONLY useful thing to do is to contact them, ask info to them, and pictures with them

[TheDude]

20 years guys.. of development.. So they've been around since 1992.. and 6 years of "successful" field trials.. So they alleging first that their trials were successful and second that they started trials in 2006..

How is it possible that no one has heard of them or their science, progress and potential SUCCESSFUL TRIAL???

When something is too good to be true it usually is..

I can't access the before and afters but maybe in 2006 growing a few sparse follicles on the head was considered successful..

It will be hard to convince me that this isn't something that is (1) Bullshit (2) If legit, effective.

[elvispresley]

What we really should do is contact these people personally.

Ian Park
Gina Galvis
John Candil
Maria Miranda

They've all had this treatment done on them, they've all seen "results". If we could somehow get in contacts with the patients themselves, we might be able to get some information out of them regarding the validity of treatments this company is offering.

absolutely quote!

is the only thing to do contact them ,talk with them , ask question to them , and make REAL PICTURES with them, after that we will have tha answers... if someone is from CANADA , let us know , will be wonderfull.

[Kirby_]

The before/after pictures looked crap, to be honest. Barely looked like the same heads! I've seen far better before and after snaps on hairloss forums. You'd assume that a suposedly scientific-based new treatment would have much more convincing photos, backed up by microscopy.

[clandestine]

What we really should do is contact these people personally.

Ian Park
Gina Galvis
John Candil
Maria Miranda

They've all had this treatment done on them, they've all seen "results". If we could somehow get in contacts with the patients themselves, we might be able to get some information out of them regarding the validity of treatments this company is offering.

[25 going on 65]

Any new super treatment or cure won't be "stealth" at all, because whoever sells it will be able to make millions if not billions.

I tried to look at the before/after pictures but the page seems to be down. Oh well.

[Kirby_]

Much as I want there to be a 'stealth' cure/super-treatment already in existence... This looks amazingly fake. None more fake.

[2020]

their website does look nice and probably expensive and apparently they also have an office in downtown Toronto so this is probably a legit company... not sure about the product, we'll have to wait

[Kirby_]

My snake-oil detection gland is tingling...

[Hair Bear]

Honestly I wasn't impressed with the before and afters, if you look at the images of where each client is predominantly balding you may notice as I have a slight variation in hair colour which resembles the use of a hair concealer product such as toppik.

anyone else's thoughts on this?

[clandestine]

Truth, truth.