-
-
Watch the video again, inform yourself about how Replicels technology works in detail and stop spreading this "Replicel failed" nonsense. Otherwise you belong to hairsite, not here.
I can see that there's a lot, you understand in a wrong way. I've explained it a 100 times here and I'm not going to explain it again.
Replicel did not fail. Far from it.
If you really expected something like 50% regrwoth, you are literally insane.Comment
-
@krewel http://www.wtnh.com/dpp/news/health/...e#.UGge2a7lawS
They say it's years away, but Replicel are already heading into phase 2.Comment
-
No, what was confirmed was a that a SINGLE TREATMENT could beat both the efficacy AND SAFETY of Finasteride and Minoxidil combined after only 6 months.
THAT'S WHAT WAS CONFIRMED.
Your comments are stupid and damaging, until you can open a lab and create a treatment that beats in efficacy and safety both the two mainstream treatments for hair loss that have been around for over 20 years, please STFU.Comment
-
in this case ...
...you should invest all your money. good luck.Comment
-
Which is great.
The video shows, that Replicel is going the right way. The stem cells that female Yale scientist is pointing at on her screen are dermal sheath cup cells, the ones that Replicels guys are using.
They did not find out something new. But thanks to their technology, they actually show, that Dr.Hoffmanns research results about dermal sheath cup cells are true.
Edit: But also Aderans. Both concepts are actually very similar to each other.Comment
-
But Aderans in 2002 is a world apart from Replicel in 2012. Back then people got excited about growing hairs on a mouse. Now we are safely growing hair on human scalp. That is a monumental leap that not everyone seems to appreciate....taking results on a rodent species and replicating them on ourselves.
Even if Replicel never gets to market, we have learned from its research and other companies can apply this knowledge. This goes for all research on "next gen" treatments.
I'm excited about these cellular procedures. Right now the only cosmetically viable ways to fight MPB are 1. get on hormone therapy early (fin or dut), or 2. get hair transplants from one of a hand full of quality clinics in the world (and we all know the limitations of that). I think treating this condition at the cell level is the next step.
I would love for some super effective PGD2 inhibitor lotion to come out in the next couple years, but I am not holding my breath.Comment
-
If they could actually immunize hair follicles to DHT than I would call that a big damn success. However they are definetly in silent mode now. They got burned by the hype they generated before phase I 6 months results and not being able to produce satisfactory results.Comment
-
Yes this was the original research that showed it can be done.
Comment
-
Silent mode? Didnt they just release a presentation about phase II a few weeks ago? What should they do? Bullhorn Wall Street about their next phase?
Jesus Christ - what is it with people and attacking Replicel? I'd love to see the look on all your faces if they turned around and said "right, screw it, go find your own cure".Comment
-
as well as promote cancers!Comment
-
What the heck are you talking about?
I said : "The stem cells that female Yale scientist is pointing at on her screen are dermal sheath cup cells"
You say not at all? Are you blind or something? From now on, I'm just ignoring you. 10 years.. 10 years is nothing in terms of science.
Their reaction would probably be something like: "I knew it, scammers." Thinking, you can solve this kind of a problem from one day to another, is just childish.Comment
-
Replicel is dead end, enough said.Comment
Tweet
Comment